FYI

by Antique_Lighting

20 comments

  4. What does it means. What 57% quality means. Who made this study and how? What is a bathing wather, pools or a tap water? What is 100% quality water?

  5. Cyprus is being unbearable here. Like these parents who cannot shut up about their precocious kid.

  6. I’m living in the south of poland. Every time I visit north I thanks that I live in the south.

  7. I do recall there being public swimming pools test quality that was skewed for some reason against poland due to how it was taken but bathing water makes it sound like what people BATHE in, not the water in swimming pools.

  9. I mean everybody bathes and we are fine, so I guess it’s good enough

  12. Aren’t those the same studies that treated untested water as dirty and becaouse of that polish water were the worst?

  14. this is a really shitty chart imo because 58.1% “bathing quality water” means nothing

    this is the actual data:

    https://preview.redd.it/uz1e1f99kq8f1.png?width=1125&format=png&auto=webp&s=170b19717f4e3bb494d613037070e5aa6efeccf0

    the reason that poland is so low is because a large chunk (20.3%, most out of any country in the list) is unclassified, aka no data

    only 2.6% is poor quality, which is a better figure than france, sweden or the netherlands

    the rest falls into either excellent, which is the 58.1% figure, good, which is 13%, sufficient, which is 6%, or the previously mentioned unclassified, which is 20.3%

    there is something to be said anyway about why we have so much missing data however

  15. I tak dużo przecież bałtyku I większości otwartych kompielisk od ścieku bym nie odróżnił

  18. Stil;l much better than ruzzia, rojska b and, murican plantations of ceos

  20. Jak wyglądałby ranking gdyby nie wliczano Płocka?

Comments are closed.