Affordability Crisis: Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” will drive up energy costs by as much as 30% in every single state in America

https://i.redd.it/plgmxshfgu9f1.jpeg

by HVACguy1989

23 comments

  1. Remember when republicans were screaming and crying about inflation and egg prices and how they were the only people who could solve the problem?

  2. Yeah he’s an incompetent imbecile who still has a 1970’s view of the world

  3. Big beautiful will increase costs deficits and only help the rich. Typical GOP. God forbid any rich person wants to pay taxes to a system they used or abused to get rich.

  6. Well as for environmental, this is only one section from the initial reconciliation, look at the repealed, rescinded, and the defunded programs.

    🙁

    [SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS – PDF](https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2025/6/chairman-capito-releases-epw-budget-reconciliation-text)

    – SEC. ll01. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR CLEAN HEAVY-DUTY
    – Section 132 of the Clean Air Act
    – SEC. ll02. REPEAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND.
    – Section 134 of the Clean Air Act
    – SEC. ll03. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR DIESEL EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS.
    – SEC. ll04. REPEAL OF FUNDING TO ADDRESS AIR POLLUTION.
    – SEC. ll05. REPEAL OF FUNDING TO ADDRESS AIR POLLUTION AT SCHOOLS.
    – SEC. ll06. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR THE LOW EMISSIONS ELECTRICITY PROGRAM.
    – Section 135 of the Clean Air Act
    – SEC. ll07. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR SECTION 211(O) OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT.
    – SEC. ll08. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AMERICAN INNOVATION AND MANUFACTURING ACT.
    – SEC. ll09. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY AND PUBLIC INFORMATION
    – SEC. ll10. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR GREENHOUSE GAS CORPORATE REPORTING.
    – SEC. ll11. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION ASSISTANCE.
    – SEC. ll12. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR METHANE EMISSIONS AND WASTE REDUCTION INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS.
    – Subsections ‘a’ section 136 of the Clean Air Act
    * ‘b’ amended by striking ‘‘calendar year 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘calendar year 2034’’.
    – SEC. ll13. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR GREENHOUSE GAS AIR POLLUTION PLANS AND IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS.
    – Section 137 of the Clean Air Act
    – SEC. ll14. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EFFICIENT, ACCURATE, AND TIMELY REVIEWS.
    – SEC. ll15. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR LOW-EMBODIED CARBON LABELING FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS.
    – SEC. ll16. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE JUSTICE BLOCK GRANTS.
    – Section 138 of the Clean Air Act
    – SEC. ll17. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR ESA RECOVERY PLANS.
    – SEC. ll18. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE DATA COLLECTION.
    – SEC. ll19. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS.
    – SEC. ll20. REPEAL OF NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS AND EQUITY GRANT PROGRAM.
    – SEC. ll21. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR FEDERAL BUILDING ASSISTANCE.
    – SEC. ll22. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR LOW-CARBON MATERIALS FOR FEDERAL BUILDINGS.
    – SEC. ll23. REPEAL OF FUNDING FOR GSA EMERGING AND SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES.
    – SEC. ll24. REPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IMPLEMENTATION FUNDS.
    – SEC. ll25. REPEAL OF LOW-CARBON TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS GRANTS.
    – SEC. ll26. JOHN F. KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS.
    – $256,657,000, to remain available until September 30, 2029
    – SEC. ll27. REPEAL OF MULTIPOLLUTANT EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR LIGHT-DUTY AND MEDIUM- DUTY VEHICLES.
    – The final rule of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency entitled ‘‘Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later Light- Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles’’ (89 Fed. Reg. 27842 (April 18, 2024)) __shall have no force or effect__
    – SEC. ll28. PROJECT SPONSOR OPT-IN FEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS. Title I of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4331 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘
    – SEC. 112. PROJECT SPONSOR OPT-IN FEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS
    – ‘a’ PROCESS.
    * ‘1’ PROJECT SPONSOR.—A project sponsor that intends to pay a fee under this section for the preparation, or supervision of the preparation, of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement […]
    – ‘’b’ FEE AMOUNT.—The amount of a fee under this section shall be
    * ‘1’ 125 percent of the anticipated costs to prepare the environmental assessment or environmental impact statement […]
    – ‘c’ __LIMITATION ON JUDICIAL REVIEW__ The following shall not be subject to judicial review:
    * ‘1’ An environmental assessment or environmental impact statement for which a fee is paid under this section, except as provided in section 107(g)(3).
    – ‘2’ A finding of no significant impact or record of decision that is associated with an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement described in paragraph (1).’’

    – Subtitle C—Increase in Debt Limit SEC. 72001. MODIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON THE PUBLIC DEBT. The limitation under section 3101(b) of title 31, 25 United States Code, as most recently increased by section 401(b) of Public Law 118–5 (31 U.S.C. 3101 note), is __increased by $5,000,000,000,000__

  7. I am missing Alaska and Hawaii on this list that is headed “every state”?

  11. What are next weeks winning lottery numbers since OP knows the future. Pure speculation bs

  12. Does the title of this post and the graph shown match?

  13. But but but…eggs! And the woman who “suddenly turned Black” laughs too much… 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

  16. How does it do this is the next logical question. Is it by stopping subsidies? The devil is in the details.

  17. “We had the best economy when I was president, no unemployment and growth like we’ve never seen before. Inflation was so low it was deflation and unicorns were farting rainbows. You’ve never seen rainbows like that”

  19. Yah can wait to make America great again . Me paying all the wonderful billionaires all my extra money so it can trickle back down to me someday! NOT!

  23. I find it interesting that this information is published by the clean energy buyers association.  Would love to see unbiased information and even at that I am skeptical since everyone has skin in the game. 

Comments are closed.