Newham probably because of canary wharf? So many people live in Newham who works in CW
Interesting!
Do you have absolute as well as relative values? I imagine the base level in Kensington is not the same as it was it Hackney
So is that those bits of London getting even richer or starting from a lower baseline and catching up?
Interesting. I’d be interested to know the one that’s gone down and the one that’s flat over 25 years
Now do it taking away average costs inflation adjusted too, such as rent
Is this median or average? That might make a big difference.
My complaint with the graph is I’d like any kind of markers on the x-axis, I’m assuming the dip in their middle is the 2008 financial crisis, since it’s an easy one, but would still be nice to have
What is “gross disposable income”? Id have thought it should be either “gross” or “disposable” not sure if im stupid but “gross disposable” seems a contradiction?
8 comments
Newham probably because of canary wharf? So many people live in Newham who works in CW
Interesting!
Do you have absolute as well as relative values? I imagine the base level in Kensington is not the same as it was it Hackney
So is that those bits of London getting even richer or starting from a lower baseline and catching up?
Interesting. I’d be interested to know the one that’s gone down and the one that’s flat over 25 years
Now do it taking away average costs inflation adjusted too, such as rent
Is this median or average? That might make a big difference.
My complaint with the graph is I’d like any kind of markers on the x-axis, I’m assuming the dip in their middle is the 2008 financial crisis, since it’s an easy one, but would still be nice to have
What is “gross disposable income”? Id have thought it should be either “gross” or “disposable” not sure if im stupid but “gross disposable” seems a contradiction?
Comments are closed.