We should do both. There’s a thing called agrivoltaic, where you can farm in fields with solar panels. You can also use those fields to raise sheep or cattle.
It just becomes very challenging within cities prime real estate. Costs and permitting are prohibitive. Maybe if there was some incentives.
Honestly it doesn’t matter what you cover as long as it is a not a frickin’ road or railway.
Why does this keep popping up? Have you seen the state of these parking lots? How would you perform repairs under these? How would you dig up sewer lines under these?
Do both. You can grow barley and other things well under solar panels
I believe it’s a lot more expensive to build these to meet the architectural requirements which become more stringent when humans and cars will be regularly going under the panels. I don’t get why farmers are against making a passive income with their land and it can be put on non-fertile areas of land…
Even in this picture, the panels are much larger and have to be safely/securely held above the cars.
Better to just not have cars. Put the solar panels on buildings and homes, maybe lining rail lines
Vertical solar panels are actually great for fields.
Better to just not have cars. Put the solar panels on buildings and homes, maybe lining rail lines.
11 comments
Why can’t we do both and more?
It really isn’t that much.
We should do both. There’s a thing called agrivoltaic, where you can farm in fields with solar panels. You can also use those fields to raise sheep or cattle.
It just becomes very challenging within cities prime real estate. Costs and permitting are prohibitive. Maybe if there was some incentives.
Honestly it doesn’t matter what you cover as long as it is a not a frickin’ road or railway.
Why does this keep popping up? Have you seen the state of these parking lots? How would you perform repairs under these? How would you dig up sewer lines under these?
Do both. You can grow barley and other things well under solar panels
I believe it’s a lot more expensive to build these to meet the architectural requirements which become more stringent when humans and cars will be regularly going under the panels. I don’t get why farmers are against making a passive income with their land and it can be put on non-fertile areas of land…
Even in this picture, the panels are much larger and have to be safely/securely held above the cars.
Better to just not have cars. Put the solar panels on buildings and homes, maybe lining rail lines
Vertical solar panels are actually great for fields.
Better to just not have cars. Put the solar panels on buildings and homes, maybe lining rail lines.
Comments are closed.