Wittbold, K. A., Carroll, C., Iansiti, M., Zhang, H. M. & Landman, A. B. How Hospitals Are Using AI to Battle Covid-19 https://hbr.org/2020/04/how-hospitals-are-using-ai-to-battle-covid-19 (2020).
Rodriguez, J. A. & Lyles, C. R. Strengthening digital health equity by balancing techno-optimism and techno-skepticism through implementation science. NPJ Digit. Med. 6, 203 (2023).
Lupton, D. The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-tracking (Polity, 2016).
Liu, L., Stroulia, E., Nikolaidis, I., Miguel-Cruz, A. & Rios, R. A. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 91, 44–59 (2016).
Kristoffersson, A. & Lindén, M. A systematic review on the use of wearable body sensors for health monitoring: a qualitative synthesis. Sensors 20, 1502 (2020).
Gerke, S., Shachar, C., Chai, P. R. & Cohen, I. G. Regulatory, safety, and privacy concerns of home monitoring technologies during COVID-19. Nat. Med. 26, 1176–1182 (2020).
Holender, A., Sutton, S. & De Simoni, A. Opinions on the use of technology to improve tablet taking in >65-year-old patients on cardiovascular medications. J. Int. Med. Res. 46, 2754–2768 (2018).
Kononova, A. et al. The use of wearable activity trackers among older adults: focus group study of tracker perceptions, motivators, and barriers in the maintenance stage of behavior change. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 7, e9832 (2019).
Zhang, Y. et al. What matters the adherence with BP 24-hr self-monitoring wearable device among hypertensive patients? A population-based survey. Transl. Behav. Med. 10, 1053–1063 (2019).
Niess, J. et al. I Don’t Need a Goal? Attitudes and Practices in Fitness Tracking beyond WEIRD User Groups. In Proc. 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction (MobileHCI ‘21) Vol. 15, 1–14 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2021).
Nicolaidou, I., Aristeidis, L. & Lambrinos, L. A gamified app for supporting undergraduate students’ mental health: A feasibility and usability study. Digit. Health 8, 205520762211090 (2022).
Saadi, A. et al. Access to smart devices and utilization of online health resources among older cardiac rehabilitation participants. World J. Cardiol. 12, 203–209 (2020).
Kirchbuchner, F., Grosse-Puppendahl, T., Hastall, M. R., Distler, M. & Kuijper, A. Ambient Intelligence from Senior Citizens’ Perspectives: Understanding Privacy Concerns, Technology Acceptance, and Expectations. In Ambient Intelligence 2015: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (eds De Ruyter, B., Kameas, A., Chatzimisios, P., Mavrommati, I.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26005-1_4 (2015).
Cohen, C., Kampel, T. & Verloo, H. Acceptability of an intelligent wireless sensor system for the rapid detection of health issues: findings among home-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 10, 1687–1695 (2016).
Mishra, R. K. et al. Care4AD: a technology-driven platform for care coordination and management: acceptability study in dementia. Gerontology 69, 227–238 (2023).
Thapa, S., Bello, A., Maurushat, A. & Farid, F. Security risks and user perception towards adopting wearable internet of medical things. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 5519 (2023).
Gehlbach, B. K. et al. Tolerability of a comprehensive cardiorespiratory monitoring protocol in an epilepsy monitoring unit. Epilepsy Behav. 85, 173–176 (2018).
Virbel-Fleischman, C. et al. Body-worn sensors for Parkinson’s disease: a qualitative approach with patients and healthcare professionals. PloS ONE 17, e0265438 (2022).
Randall, N. et al. More than just friends: in-home use and design recommendations for sensing socially assistive robots (SARs) by older adults with depression. Paladyn, J. Behav. Robot. 10, 237–255 (2019).
Steele, R., Lo, A., Secombe, C. & Wong, Y. K. Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78, 788–801 (2009).
Megges, H. et al. User experience and clinical effectiveness with two wearable global positioning system devices in home dementia care. Alzheimer’s. Dement. Transl. Res. Clin. Interv. 4, 636–644 (2018).
Kettlewell, J., Phillips, J., Radford, K. & dasNair, R. Informing evaluation of a smartphone application for people with acquired brain injury: a stakeholder engagement study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 18, 33 (2018).
Cheng, S. M. et al. Use of wireless respiratory rate sensor monitoring during opioid patient-controlled analgesia after gynaecological surgery: a prospective cohort study. Indian J. Anaesth. 65, 146 (2021).
Auður, A. J., Kessler, L. G., Rim, S. Y. & Kim, J. E. What patients and care partners want in a wearable dialysis device: a mixed-methods study. IISE Trans. Healthc. Syst. Eng. 12, 101–110 (2021).
Hollander, J. B., Folta, S. C., Graves, E. M., Allen, J. D. & Situ, M. A fitness app for monitoring walking behavior and perception (Runkeeper): mixed methods pilot study. JMIR Form. Res. 5, e22571 (2021).
van der Weegen, S., Verwey, R., Tange, H., Spreeuwenberg, M. & de Witte, L. Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 17, 311–322 (2014).
Riggare, S., Duncan, T. S., Hvitfeldt, H. & Hägglund, M. You have to know why you’re doing this”: a mixed methods study of the benefits and burdens of self-tracking in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 19, 175 (2019).
Thilo, F. J. S., Hahn, S., Halfens, R. J. G. & Schols, J. M. G. A. Usability of a wearable fall detection prototype from the perspective of older people—a real field testing approach. J. Clin. Nurs. 28, 310–320 (2018).
Malik, M. S., Abideen, Z. U., Akoh, J. A. & Houlberg, K. Exploring views and expectations of clinicians, nurses, and kidney transplant recipients regarding protocol development of a study to investigate feasibility of the implantable doppler probe in kidney transplantation: patient-public involvement consultations. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 1, 307–316 (2023).
Honey, M., Smith, C., Parsons, J., Parsons, M. & Burgess, L. Consumers’ perspectives of wireless cardiac monitoring: Results of a small New Zealand telehealth project. Health Care Inform. Rev. Online 15, 2–7 (2011).
McClincy, M. et al. Perspectives on the gamification of an interactive health technology for postoperative rehabilitation of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: user-centered design approach. JMIR Serious Games. 9, e27195 (2021).
Peeters, M. W. H., Schouten, G. & Wouters, E. J. Wearables for residents of nursing homes with dementia and challenging behaviour: values, attitudes, and needs. Gerontechnology 20, 1–13 (2021).
Nguyen, N. H. et al. A qualitative evaluation of breast cancer survivors’ acceptance of and preferences for consumer wearable technology activity trackers. Support. Care Cancer 25, 3375–3384 (2017).
Hall, A., Boulton, E. & Stanmore, E. Older adults’ perceptions of wearable technology hip protectors: implications for further research and development strategies. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 14, 663–668 (2018).
Kang, H. S., Park, H. R., Kim, C. J. & Singh-Carlson, S. Experiences of using wearable continuous glucose monitors in adults with diabetes: a qualitative descriptive study. Sci. Diab. 48, 362–371 (2022).
Caswell, N. et al. Patient engagement in medical device design: refining the essential attributes of a wearable, pre-void, ultrasound alarm for nocturnal enuresis. Pharm. Med. 34, 39–48 (2020).
Auxier, J. et al. Exploring access as a process of adaptation in a self-monitoring perinatal ehealth system: mixed methods study from a sociomaterial perspective. JMIR Form. Res. 7, e44385 (2023).
Sedgwick, C. E. et al. Patient and clinician experiences and opinions of the use of a novel home use medical device in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease—a qualitative study. J. Foot Ankle Res. 14, 61 (2021).
Schroeder, J. et al. Examining self-tracking by people with migraine. In Proc. 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference Vol. 1, 135–148 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2018).
Noor, N. M., Zolkepli, I. A. & Omar, B. It’s cool to be healthy! The effect of perceived coolness on the adoption of fitness bands and health behaviour. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. 22, 1 (2023).
Jeong, J., Kim, Y. & Roh, T. Do consumers care about aesthetics and compatibility? The intention to use wearable devices in health care. SAGE Open. 11, 215824402110400 (2021).
van Osch, M. et al. User preferences and usability of iVitality: optimizing an innovative online research platform for home-based health monitoring. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 3, 857 (2015).
Keogh, A., Dorn, J. F., Walsh, L., Calvo, F. & Caulfield, B. An observational study comparing the usability and acceptability of wearable sensors in a real-world context of older Irish adults. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 8, e15704 (2020).
Brewer, J. L., Taber-Doughty, T. & Kubik, S. Safety assessment of a home-based telecare system for adults with developmental disabilities in Indiana: a multi-stakeholder perspective. J. Telemed. Telecare. 16, 265–269 (2010).
Kokts-Porietis, R. L. et al. Breast cancer survivors’ perspectives on a home-based physical activity intervention utilizing wearable technology. Support. Care Cancer 27, 2885–2892 (2018).
Marler, J. D. et al. Assessment of a personal interactive carbon monoxide breath sensor in people who smoke cigarettes: single-arm cohort study. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e22811 (2020).
Vergier, J. et al. Evaluation of flash glucose monitoring after long-term use: a pediatric survey. Prim. Care Diab. 13, 63–70 (2019).
Davat, A. & Martin-Juchat, F. Patients’ information needs related to a monitoring implant for heart failure: co-designed study based on affect stories. JMIR Hum. Factors 10, e38096 (2023).
Shin, G., Feng, Y., Jarrahi, M. H. & Gafinowitz, N. Beyond novelty effect: a mixed-methods exploration into the motivation for long-term activity tracker use. JAMIA Open. 2, 62–72 (2018).
Xing, F., Peng, G., Zhang, B., Li, S. & Liang, X. Socio-technical barriers affecting large-scale deployment of AI-enabled wearable medical devices among the ageing population in China. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 166, 120609 (2021).
Bolesnikov, A., Cochrane, K. A. & Girouard, A. Wearable Identities: understanding wearables’ potential for supporting the expression of queer identities. In Proc. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘23) Vol. 393, 1–19 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2023).
Asimakopoulos, S., Asimakopoulos, G. & Spillers, F. Motivation and user engagement in fitness tracking: heuristics for mobile healthcare wearables. Informatics 4, 5 (2017).
Alexander, S. M. et al. A qualitative study of the acceptability of remote electronic bednet use monitoring in Uganda. BMC Public Health 22, 1 (2022).
D’Haeseleer, I., Gerling, K., Schreurs, D., Vanrumste, B. & Abeele, V. V. Ageing is not a disease: pitfalls for the acceptance of self-management health systems supporting healthy ageing. In Proc. 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ‘19) Vol. 19, 286–298 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2019).
Claes, V., Devriendt, E., Tournoy, J. & Milisen, K. Attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards in-home monitoring of the activities of daily living with contactless sensors: an explorative study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 52, 134–148 (2015).
Kamble, A., Desai, S. & Abhang, N. Wearable activity trackers: a structural investigation into acceptance and goal achievements of generation Z. Am. J. Health Educ. 52, 307–320 (2021).
Hirst, J. E. et al. Acceptability and user satisfaction of a smartphone-based, interactive blood glucose management system in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J. Diab. Sci. Technol. 9, 111–115 (2014).
Gambier-Ross, K., McLernon, D. J. & Morgan, H. M. A mixed methods exploratory study of women’s relationships with and uses of fertility tracking apps. Digit. Health 4, 1 (2018).
Argent, R. et al. Wearable sensor-based exercise biofeedback for orthopaedic rehabilitation: a mixed methods user evaluation of a prototype system. Sensors 19, 432 (2019).
Lew, S. Q., Sikka, N., Thompson, C., Cherian, T. & Magnus, M. Adoption of telehealth: remote biometric monitoring among peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States. Perit. Dialysis Int.37, 576–578 (2017).
Carey, N. et al. Co-design and prototype development of the ‘Ayzot App’: a mobile phone based remote monitoring system for palliative care. Palliat. Med. 1, 026921632311624 (2023).
Baik, J. & Jang, E. Where horizontal and vertical surveillances meet: sense-making of US COVID-19 contact-tracing apps during a health crisis. Mob. Media Commun. 10, 468–486 (2022).
Blinka, M. D. et al. Developing a sensor-based mobile application for in-home frailty assessment: a qualitative study. Innov. Aging 3, 831–832 (2019).
Wrede, C., Braakman-Jansen, A. & van Gemert-Pijnen, L. Requirements for unobtrusive monitoring to support home-based dementia care: qualitative study among formal and informal caregivers. JMIR Aging 4, e26875 (2021).
Klinker, K., Wiesche, M. & Helmut, K. Smart glasses in health care: a patient trust perspective. In Proc. Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2020.435 (2020).
Simblett, S. K. et al. Engaging across dimensions of diversity: a cross-national perspective on mHealth tools for managing relapsing remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 32, 123–132 (2019).
de Angel, V., Lewis, S., White, K. M., Matcham, F. & Hotopf, M. Clinical targets and attitudes towards implementing digital health tools for remote measurement in treatment for depression: a qualitative study. JMIR Ment. Health 9, e38934 (2022).
Verdun di Cantogno, R., Russell, S. & Snow, T. Understanding and meeting injection device needs in multiple sclerosis: a survey of patient attitudes and practices. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 1, 173 (2011).
Minoi, J. L. & Yeo, A. W. Remote health monitoring system in a rural population: challenges and opportunities. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES). https://doi.org/10.1109/iecbes.2014.7047641 (2014).
McNaney, R. et al. Exploring perceptions of cross-sectoral data sharing with people with Parkinson’s. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501984 (2022).
Dixon, E., Piper, A. M. & Lazar, A. ‘Taking care of myself as long as I can’: how people with dementia configure self-management systems. In Proc. 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445225 (2021).
Weenk, M. et al. Continuous monitoring of vital signs in the general ward using wearable devices: randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e15471 (2022).
Read, E. A. et al. Stakeholder perspectives on in-home passive remote monitoring to support aging in place in the province of New Brunswick, Canada: rapid qualitative investigation. JMIR Aging 5, e31486 (2022).
Cheung, C., Bietz, M. J., Patrick, K. & Bloss, C. S. Privacy attitudes among early adopters of emerging health technologies. PLoS ONE 11, e0166389 (2016).
Pavic, M. et al. Feasibility and usability aspects of continuous remote monitoring of health status in palliative cancer patients using wearables. Oncology 98, 386–395 (2019).
Lupton, D. It’s made me a lot more aware”: a new materialist analysis of health self-tracking. Media Int. Aust. 171, 66–79 (2019).
Bacchin, D., Pernice, G. F. A., Sardena, M., Malvestio, M. & Gamberini, L. Caregivers’ perceived usefulness of an iot-based smart bed. In Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions. Smart Environments, Ecosystems, and Cities (eds Streitz, N. A., Konomi, S.) Vol. 2022, 13325 (2022).
Cristiano, A. et al. Older adults’ and clinicians’ perspectives on a smart health platform for the aging population: design and evaluation study. JMIR Aging 5, e29623 (2022).
Ingvaldsen, S. H. et al. A biofeedback app for migraine: development and usability study. JMIR Form. Res. 5, e23229 (2021).
Chevance, A. et al. Acceptability of and willingness to take digital pills by patients, the public, and health care professionals: qualitative content analysis of a large online survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e25597, https://doi.org/10.2196/25597 (2022).
Baskaran, K. & Mathew, S. K. Danger vs fear: an empirical study on wearable users’ privacy coping. In Proc. 2020 on Computers and People Research Conference (SIGMIS-CPR’20). https://doi.org/10.1145/3378539.3393856 (2020).
Yaeger, K. A., Martini, M., Yaniv, G., Oermann, E. K. & Costa, A. B. United States regulatory approval of medical devices and software applications enhanced by artificial intelligence. Health Policy Technol. 8, 192–197 (2019).
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Regulations and Approval/Certification of Medical Devices | Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency www.pmda.go.jp/english/review-services/reviews/0004.html (2024).
Huston, P., Edge, V. L. & Bernier, E. Reaping the benefits of Open Data in public health. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 45, 252–256 (2019).
Rampazzo, F., Raybould, A., Rampazzo, P., Barker, R. & Leasure, D. “UPDATE: I’m pregnant!”: inferring global downloads and reasons for using menstrual tracking apps. Digit. Health, 10, https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241298315 (2024).
Gouda, H. N. et al. Global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Glob. Health 7, 1375–1E87 (2019).
de Cock, K. M., Simone, P. M. M., Davison, V. & Slutsker, L. The new global health. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 19, 1192–1197 (2013).
Ragnedda, M. & Anna, G. Digital Inequalities in the Global South (Springer International Publishing, 2020).
Shah, R. N., Nghiem, J. & Ranney, M. L. The rise of digital health and innovation centers at academic medical centers: time for a new industry relationship paradigm. JAMA Health Forum 2, e210339 (2021).
Ramírez-Castañeda, V. Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: the case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences. PLoS ONE 15, e0238372 (2020).
Allouch, B. S., Jaschinski, C., Deboeverie, F., Aghajan, H. & Philips, W. Lessons learned from SONOPA (SOcial Networks for Older adults to Promote an Active life). Geron Technol. 15, 71s (2016).
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. & Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5, 1 (2016).
Auger, C., Miller, W. C., Jutai, J. W. & Tamblyn, R. Development and feasibility of an automated call monitoring intervention for older wheelchair users: the MOvIT project. BMC Health Serv. Res. 15, 386 (2015).
Hong, Q. N. et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool https://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-repositories/search/232 (2018).
Hauray, B., Boullier, H., Gaudillière, J. P. & Michel, H. Conflict of Interest and Medicine: Knowledge, Practices, and Mobilizations (Routledge, 2021).
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006).