European Union flag in front of the European Commission.
getty
Amid a confused roll-out of its latest long-term budget proposal, the European Commission has signaled it will move to a more ‘punitive’ approach in trying to get developing countries to take back more deportations of their citizens. The change, which will affect the way money is spent from the EU’s $233bn external funding instrument, would see the bloc suspend or even cancel development assistance if countries don’t co-operate with the EU’s ambitions to reduce migration and increase deportations of failed asylum seekers.
The Commission’s proposal for the next budget period – which acts as a curtain-raiser for future negotiation and sets the likely tone for what will be the final budget – has already generated a lot of controversy and seen policy analysts scrambling to understand what’s coming. The proposal reflects the dominant policy agenda of the Commission – namely defense, competitiveness and border security. To that end, various funding instruments have been grouped together to form mega-funds known as ‘National and regional partnership plans.’
These mega-funds will give a lot more discretion to member states to dole out money as they see fit, rather than being constrained by spending targets set by the EU. This, in practice, has some asylum and migration researchers and advocates concerned that member states will neglect funding for programs to better support people already sheltering in Europe, and spend it rather on building up their borders – something many member states have made clear they want to do.
While pointing out that a lot remains unclear when it comes to how the new budget will affect people on the move, “what we know is that the proposal is to increase resources for funds that have sponsored violent border surveillance in the past,” says Chiara Catelli, Project Officer at the undocumented migrant charity PICUM. “The same goes for Frontex, an agency that’s been accused of complicity in human rights violations at the borders multiple times.”
Buried within the budget proposal is another clause that has set a lot of migration advocates on edge. Within the proposal text around the new external funding instrument – to be known as the Global Europe Instrument – it says that development funding for poor countries outside the EU could be suspended or even cut off, if those countries don’t cooperate with the EU in accepting deportations of their citizens.
While the EU – and other major powers – have often used their economic might to convince poorer countries to follow their agenda, it is a new step to have enshrined in law such a ‘punitive’ approach, at least for the EU. It does, however, mirror broader policy developments in the EU and U.K., the latter of which is reportedly considering overall migration and visa policy as a lever to convince third countries to welcome back ‘returns.’ At the same time, the EU is believed to be exploring how it may use trade policy as a similar lever, an idea expressed by a Belgian politician in June.