Boris Johnson’s father Stanley has said the UK’s leadership “from the front” during the Ukraine crisis demonstrates why Brexit was a “probably a good idea”.
Stanley Johnson – a Europhile who voted Remain at the referendum – criticised EU leaders for failing to act quickly enough in cutting oil imports or supplying arms to Ukraine.
“At this moment you have to say Europe needs to pull its socks up,” he told LBC. “I mean, Germany is saying they can’t cut back on its oil imports. Well, why isn’t the rest of Europe coming to help Germany?”
Johnson Snr added: “I say to myself, in this particular case, Brexit was probably a good idea, because Boris has been able to lead from the front here.”
The prime minister’s father also said the EU was being held back by member Hungary and its authoritarian prime minister Viktor Orban, who has been an ally of Russian president Vladimir Putin.
“You have Viktor Orban up there who is holding the European framework up from making the right decisions,” he said.
Asked about Britain’s decision to send 120 armoured vehicles as well as new anti-ship missile systems, Johnson Snr said: “I think [UK leadership] has been incredibly important. I think the anti-ship missiles which are going out with [armoured vehicles] – this is vital.”
He added: “Europe needs to come in behind us in a big way. And I’m not yet convinced that they’ve got the message.”
Despite a EU ban on coal from Russia, and moves to ban oil, consensus among the 27 EU member countries on ending Russian gas supply has proved more difficult to secure.
Though Berlin has agreed to wean itself off Russian fossil fuels by mid-2024, the German chancellor Olaf Scholz said last week it was not possible to cut the gas supplies quickly.
Johnson Snr also praised his son’s trip to Ukrainian capital on Saturday, where he held surprise talks and walked around the streets of Kyiv with president Volodymyr Zelensky.
“I had absolutely no prior knowledge – I will say, I thought it was a wonderful, wonderful example of leading from the front,” he said.
EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen also met Zelensky in Kyiv, and more western leaders were expected to visit the Ukrainian capital this week.
It comes as foreign secretary Liz Truss vowed to hold Vladimir Putin “and his regime to account” if it is proven that Russian forces used chemical agents in an attack on Mariupol.
The city’s Azov regiment reported soldiers were left dizzy and unable to breathe after a substance was dropped on them from a Russian drone, according to reports.
Ms Truss tweeted: “We are working urgently with partners to verify details. Any use of such weapons would be a callous escalation in this conflict and we will hold Putin and his regime to account.”
Armed forces minister James Heappey said on Tuesday morning that the UK had not been able to verify those reports. “The Ukrainian system … themselves haven’t yet been able to confirm to us that they have been used.”
But he said that if chemical weapons “are used at all then president Putin should know that all possible options are on the table in terms of how the West might respond”.
Why are we still giving this cunt oxygen?
Get him fed into the protein bank ffs.
>“I had absolutely no prior knowledge – I will say, I thought it was a wonderful, wonderful example of leading from the front,” he said.
>
>EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen also met Zelensky in Kyiv, and more western leaders were expected to visit the Ukrainian capital this week.
von der Leyen was there on Friday and then Boris Johnson went the day after. Shame no one informed Stanley.
Stanley Johnson, an alleged wife beater. Father of a man whose actions and inactions have led to at least 20,000 avoidable deaths.
If only he’d kept it in his trousers in 1964.
Oh aye. With all the routes into Britain clogged up with lorries, Russia have got no chance of invading us!
What is he even on about?
To start, Ukraine military aid is *NATO,* a military alliance the country (and much of EU) hasn’t left. Not in any way related to EU, which is economic.
Secondly the initial sanctions he is praising? Boris’ were so weak Parliament savaged him over the matter.
>Layla Moran, for the Lib Dems, summed up MPs’ sentiment: ‘Five banks. Three of Putin’s cronies. Two of which were already sanctioned by the US. This is weak, weak, weak’
It was only once the US and EU announced their more substantial initial sanctions that Boris was shamed into following their lead.
Or worse, Ukraine refugee policy. Hypocritical as it is (considering Syrian refugees,) at least the EU is allowing Ukrainian refugees open sanctuary, they can come in freely without visas.
Meanwhile in the UK, we have Patel’s anti-foreigner head smoking trying to process a means to let *more* “foreigners” in.
Apparently “leading from the front” is providing military obligations as expected of a NATO country, while following more severe US and EU sanctions, and drastically trailing EU on humanitarian issues.
Comments in this thread are as unhinged as expected. This sub, and others, fawned after Stanley when he publically disagreed with his son on Brexit, and now that he’s changed his opinion based on new evidence we get high grade comments like those high voted ITT.
7 comments
Article contents:
Boris Johnson’s father Stanley has said the UK’s leadership “from the front” during the Ukraine crisis demonstrates why Brexit was a “probably a good idea”.
Stanley Johnson – a Europhile who voted Remain at the referendum – criticised EU leaders for failing to act quickly enough in cutting oil imports or supplying arms to Ukraine.
“At this moment you have to say Europe needs to pull its socks up,” he told LBC. “I mean, Germany is saying they can’t cut back on its oil imports. Well, why isn’t the rest of Europe coming to help Germany?”
Johnson Snr added: “I say to myself, in this particular case, Brexit was probably a good idea, because Boris has been able to lead from the front here.”
The prime minister’s father also said the EU was being held back by member Hungary and its authoritarian prime minister Viktor Orban, who has been an ally of Russian president Vladimir Putin.
“You have Viktor Orban up there who is holding the European framework up from making the right decisions,” he said.
Asked about Britain’s decision to send 120 armoured vehicles as well as new anti-ship missile systems, Johnson Snr said: “I think [UK leadership] has been incredibly important. I think the anti-ship missiles which are going out with [armoured vehicles] – this is vital.”
He added: “Europe needs to come in behind us in a big way. And I’m not yet convinced that they’ve got the message.”
Despite a EU ban on coal from Russia, and moves to ban oil, consensus among the 27 EU member countries on ending Russian gas supply has proved more difficult to secure.
Though Berlin has agreed to wean itself off Russian fossil fuels by mid-2024, the German chancellor Olaf Scholz said last week it was not possible to cut the gas supplies quickly.
Johnson Snr also praised his son’s trip to Ukrainian capital on Saturday, where he held surprise talks and walked around the streets of Kyiv with president Volodymyr Zelensky.
“I had absolutely no prior knowledge – I will say, I thought it was a wonderful, wonderful example of leading from the front,” he said.
EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen also met Zelensky in Kyiv, and more western leaders were expected to visit the Ukrainian capital this week.
It comes as foreign secretary Liz Truss vowed to hold Vladimir Putin “and his regime to account” if it is proven that Russian forces used chemical agents in an attack on Mariupol.
The city’s Azov regiment reported soldiers were left dizzy and unable to breathe after a substance was dropped on them from a Russian drone, according to reports.
Ms Truss tweeted: “We are working urgently with partners to verify details. Any use of such weapons would be a callous escalation in this conflict and we will hold Putin and his regime to account.”
Armed forces minister James Heappey said on Tuesday morning that the UK had not been able to verify those reports. “The Ukrainian system … themselves haven’t yet been able to confirm to us that they have been used.”
But he said that if chemical weapons “are used at all then president Putin should know that all possible options are on the table in terms of how the West might respond”.
Why are we still giving this cunt oxygen?
Get him fed into the protein bank ffs.
>“I had absolutely no prior knowledge – I will say, I thought it was a wonderful, wonderful example of leading from the front,” he said.
>
>EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen also met Zelensky in Kyiv, and more western leaders were expected to visit the Ukrainian capital this week.
von der Leyen was there on Friday and then Boris Johnson went the day after. Shame no one informed Stanley.
Stanley Johnson, an alleged wife beater. Father of a man whose actions and inactions have led to at least 20,000 avoidable deaths.
If only he’d kept it in his trousers in 1964.
Oh aye. With all the routes into Britain clogged up with lorries, Russia have got no chance of invading us!
What is he even on about?
To start, Ukraine military aid is *NATO,* a military alliance the country (and much of EU) hasn’t left. Not in any way related to EU, which is economic.
Secondly the initial sanctions he is praising? Boris’ were so weak Parliament savaged him over the matter.
https://inews.co.uk/news/russia-sanctions-what-uk-against-putin-ukraine-meaning-oligarchs-banks-explained-1475669?ico=in-line_link
https://inews.co.uk/opinion/ukraine-conflict-boris-johnsons-sanctions-on-russia-dont-go-far-enough-1477104
>Layla Moran, for the Lib Dems, summed up MPs’ sentiment: ‘Five banks. Three of Putin’s cronies. Two of which were already sanctioned by the US. This is weak, weak, weak’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/boris-johnsonfiresa-barrageof-sanctions-blanks/2022/02/23/95ba200a-948a-11ec-bb31-74fc06c0a3a5_story.html
It was only once the US and EU announced their more substantial initial sanctions that Boris was shamed into following their lead.
Or worse, Ukraine refugee policy. Hypocritical as it is (considering Syrian refugees,) at least the EU is allowing Ukrainian refugees open sanctuary, they can come in freely without visas.
https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/ukraine-refugees-how-countries-globally-helping/
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lancashire-60797929
Meanwhile in the UK, we have Patel’s anti-foreigner head smoking trying to process a means to let *more* “foreigners” in.
Apparently “leading from the front” is providing military obligations as expected of a NATO country, while following more severe US and EU sanctions, and drastically trailing EU on humanitarian issues.
Comments in this thread are as unhinged as expected. This sub, and others, fawned after Stanley when he publically disagreed with his son on Brexit, and now that he’s changed his opinion based on new evidence we get high grade comments like those high voted ITT.