From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
Read more
A South Korean court is reconsidering the 61-year-old conviction of a woman for injuring a man while defending herself during a violent sexual assault.
“This was a justified defensive act. It was not excessive, nor was it unlawful,” Korea Times reported the prosecutors as saying. “We sincerely apologise to Choi Mal Ja, a victim of a sex crime who should have been protected as one.”
Choi, then a teenager, was assaulted by a 21-year-old man surnamed Noh who forced his tongue into her mouth after pinning her down in the southern town of Gimhae. In an effort to escape, she bit off about half an inch of his tongue.
Rather than being recognised as a survivor, Choi was charged with aggravated bodily harm and sentenced to 10 months in prison, suspended for two years. Her claim of self-defence was dismissed.
Her assailant was sentenced to just six months in prison, also suspended, for trespassing and threatening her with a weapon. He was never convicted of attempted rape.
A South Korean woman walks past banners and tied bras during a rally protesting sexual violence in Seoul on 16 July 2011 (AFP via Getty)
The original prosecution had argued that Choi’s response to the attacker “exceeded the reasonable bounds of legally permissible self-defence”.
She was accused of causing permanent injury, though records showed that the attacker did not suffer a lasting disability. Prosecutors reportedly even tried to persuade her to marry him.
Choi later revealed that the litigation caused significant financial strain on her family and that the assailant continued harassing them during the proceedings. She lived for decades with the stigma of a criminal record while he avoided public scrutiny.
“For 61 years, the state made me live as a criminal,” Choi said outside the court on Wednesday. “If I have any hope or dream left, it is that future generations will live in a world free of sexual violence.”
After South Korea’s MeToo movement gained ground, Choi was inspired to demand a retrial in 2020.
Her initial petition in 2020 was rejected, with the Busan court citing lack of “clear evidence” and arguing that social and cultural shifts alone did not justify overturning the ruling.
She appealed to the Supreme Court, which, in December 2023, ordered the case to be reopened.
In February this year, the Busan High Court upheld Choi’s appeal, paving the way for a retrial.
In court, Busan’s chief prosecutor Jeong Myeong Won said: “We have caused Choi Mal Ja, a victim of a sex crime who should have been protected as one, indescribable pain and agony.”
Choi’s lawyer argued the 1964 order was a miscarriage of justice even by the standards of that time.
“This is not about evolving social values. This was a wrongful judgment from the start,” the counsel said.
The final ruling is scheduled for 10 September.
Legal observers expect the court to acquit Choi.
Outside the courtroom on Wednesday, Choi raised her fist and declared: “We won!”
She embraced campaigners and supporters from civic groups who had rallied behind her.