>”*It was the widest pay gap by far between the top executive and median worker… Brian Niccol received nearly $98,000,000 compared to the typical Starbucks worker’s pay of less than $15,000″*
And when people talk about wealth inequality and one day, “Torches and Pitchforks”, we’re the unreasonable ones. Things that can’t go on forever, don’t.
The market determines salary. If the ceo changed companies odds are the new company would pay him about the same. The same can be said about the lowest paid worker
This is disgusting
As long as those typical workers gladly accept that pay, why pay them more? From a business perspective?
6 comments
[deleted]
>”*It was the widest pay gap by far between the top executive and median worker… Brian Niccol received nearly $98,000,000 compared to the typical Starbucks worker’s pay of less than $15,000″*
And when people talk about wealth inequality and one day, “Torches and Pitchforks”, we’re the unreasonable ones. Things that can’t go on forever, don’t.
The market determines salary. If the ceo changed companies odds are the new company would pay him about the same. The same can be said about the lowest paid worker
This is disgusting
As long as those typical workers gladly accept that pay, why pay them more? From a business perspective?
Sick in every way
Comments are closed.