On his first day back in office, Mr. Trump signed an executive order to stop treating as U.S. citizens any children born in the United States after a certain date whose parents are undocumented or who are in the country legally but temporarily.
In June, after legal challenges, the Supreme Court ruled that several district court judges had exceeded their authority in blocking the policy across the country. In July, however, a federal judge issued a preliminary order blocking the Trump administration from enforcing the order after certifying a challenge by the A.C.L.U. as a class action.
Supreme Court ruling · June 27 CASA v. Trump
An immigrant advocacy group sued, saying Mr. Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship order is unconstitutional. In late June, the Supreme Court ruled that district court judges had exceeded their authority in blocking the policy across the country. The ruling also limited the ability of lower-court judges to block executive branch policies nationwide, but did not address the constitutionality of the executive order.
Preliminary injunction · July 10 Barbara v. Trump
The A.C.L.U. filed suit hours after the Supreme Court’s June ruling limiting the ability of lower court judges to issue nationwide injunctions. In July, a federal judge blocked the Trump administration from enforcing the executive order ending birthright citizenship after certifying the lawsuit as a class action. It was effectively the only way the judge could impose such a far-reaching limit after the Supreme Court ruling.
New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support v. Trump Washington v. Trump Doe v. Trump New Jersey v. Trump New York Immigration Coalition v. Trump County of Santa Clara v. Trump OCA-Asian Pacific American Advocates v. Rubio Le v. Trump Immigration
Opponents are challenging immigration policies, including the administration’s efforts to authorize immigration agents to enter houses of worship, speed up and broaden the scope of deportations, withhold federal funds from so-called sanctuary cities and make it harder for refugees to claim asylum in the United States.
One of the most closely watched immigration cases concerns a Maryland man, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, who in March was deported to a prison in El Salvador without a hearing — and despite a court order that expressly forbid authorities to send him to the country. The Trump administration had accused Mr. Abrego Garcia of having ties to MS-13, though he had never been charged with being a gang member or any other crime.
Appealed · July 1 President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Department of Homeland Security
On May 22, the Trump administration said it would halt Harvard University’s ability to enroll international students, taking aim at a crucial funding source for the nation’s oldest and wealthiest college. The move was a major escalation of the administration’s efforts to pressure the school to fall in line with the president’s agenda. Less than 24 hours later, the university sued the administration, accusing it of a “campaign of retribution.” In June, a federal judge in Boston sided with Harvard and blocked a Trump administration effort to rescind the school’s right to host international students. The administration has appealed the decision.
Preliminary injunction · April 4 Abrego Garcia v. Noem
In June, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who in March was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, was flown back to the United States to face charges of transporting undocumented migrants. A federal judge in Tennessee said in July that Mr. Abrego Garcia should be freed from custody in his criminal case even as a judge in Maryland issued a separate order protecting him from being hastily expelled again. The Justice Department has signaled that it intends to begin immediate efforts to re-deport him if he is released from custody.
Ozturk v. Hyde
In March, a Turkish graduate student who co-wrote an essay criticizing Israel in a student newspaper was arrested outside her Massachusetts home by masked federal agents. The student, Rumeysa Ozturk, sued, saying the government had detained her in unconstitutional retaliation for protected speech. After Ms. Ozturk spent six weeks in detention, a judge ordered her to be released while her case continues.
Doe v. Noem
On May 30, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration, for now, to revoke a Biden-era humanitarian program intended to give temporary residency to more than 500,000 immigrants from countries facing war and political turmoil. The ruling exposes some migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Haiti to possible deportation. Earlier in the month, the justices allowed the administration, for now, to remove deportation protections from nearly 350,000 Venezuelan immigrants who had been allowed to remain in the United States under a program known as Temporary Protected Status.
Khalil v. Joyce
Mahmoud Khalil is a legal permanent resident whom the Trump administration detained for more than three months. The administration said he had enabled the spread of antisemitism and sought to deport him. Mr. Khalil graduated from Columbia University, where he played a prominent role in pro-Palestinian student demonstrations. His lawyers denied the accusations of antisemitism and protested his detention as unconstitutional retaliation for free speech. Mr. Khalil was released on bail in late June.
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Ortega Gonzalez v. Noem National TPS Alliance v. Noem Phan v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security D.V.D v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Phan v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Neguse v. ICE
Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. Noem New England Synod, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security California v. U.S.D.A. Washington v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security New York v. D.O.J. Hernandez v. Noem Mitishov v. Trump Harsono v. Trump C.M. v. Noem Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem CASA v. Noem American Association of University Professors v. Rubio Pourhosseinhendabad v. Trump Castaneda v. ICE Mennonite Church U.S.A. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights v. U.S. Department of State Luna Gutierrez v. Noem United Farm Workers v. Noem City and County of San Francisco v. Trump S. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security American Gateways v. D.O.J. Centro De Trabajadores Unidos v. Bessent Suri v. Trump Guerrero-Sandoval v. Bondi Bitar v. Bondi Mahdawi v. Trump Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pineros y Campesinos Unidos Del Noreste v. Noem Kashikov v. Noem Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration v. Bondi Dismissed · undefined NaN J.P.P. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security National T.P.S. Alliance v. Noem Kapatel v. Bondi Patel v. Bondi Isserdasani v. Noem Deore v. Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security League of United Latin American Citizens v. Executive Office of the President Gunaydin v. Trump Haitian Americans United v. Trump Pacito v. Trump Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. Noem Chung v. Trump E.Q. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security City of Chelsea v. Trump City of New York v. Trump CASA v. Noem Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center v. Noem Make the Road New York v. Noem Dismissed · July 24 Sultan v. Trump Plaintiffs won · July 15 Haitian Evangelical Clergy Association v. Trump Dismissed · July 1 Jane Doe 1 v. Bondi Dismissed · June 27 Fernandez Medina v. Noem Dismissed · June 9 Denver Public Schools v. Noem Dismissed · May 22 Espinoza Escalona v. Noem Dismissed · May 2 United States Conference of Catholic Bishops v. U.S. Department of State Dismissed · April 29 Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Dismissed · April 2 Taal v. Trump Dismissed · Feb. 27 Organized Communities Against Deportations v. Huffman Show 61 more items + Alien Enemies Act
In March, Mr. Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act in an effort to round up and deport scores of immigrants who he claimed were members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. Federal courts around the country have been divided on whether he has properly used the law, which was passed in 1798 and is meant to be employed only in times of declared war or during an invasion by a hostile foreign nation. Judges have been considering a series of challenges from migrants who may be subject to deportation under the law.
Show 3 more items + DOGE
At the heart of much of the action is Elon Musk’s initiative called the Department of Government Efficiency, which has amassed extraordinary power, ostensibly to cut costs and reorder the government.
Appealed · May 22 U.S. Instititue of Peace v. Jackson
The Trump administration took over and gutted the U.S. Institute of Peace, an independent nonprofit created by Congress to seek diplomatic solutions to global conflicts. The administration’s action resulted in a series of events that included a dramatic confrontation among agency staff, DOGE representatives, private security and law enforcement authorities. A federal judge ordered the reinstatement of officials ejected by the White House, but an appeals court stayed the order, yielding control of the institute back to Mr. Trump while the case proceeds.
State of New York v. Trump California v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Job Corps Association v. Department of Labor American Association of Physics Teachers v. National Science Foundation American Council of Learned Societies v. McDonald Aviel v. Gor Child Trends v. U.S. Department of Education American Oversight v. DOGE American Association of People With Disabilities v. Dudek American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO v. Social Security Administration Pippenger v. DOGE Brehm v. Marocco Japanese American Citizens League v. Musk Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Department of Interior American Federation of Teachers v. Bessent Does 1-26 v. Musk New Mexico v. Musk Citizens Against Donald Trump v. Trump American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. U.S. Department of Labor American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Ezell Alliance for Retired Americans v. Bessent Project on Government Oversight v. Trump Center for Taxpayer Rights v. Internal Revenue Service American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management Nemeth-Greenleaf v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management Electronic Privacy Information Center v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management Doe v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management Lentini v. DOGE Dismissed · May 15 Gribbon v. Musk Dismissed · April 16 University of California Student Association v. Carter Show 21 more items + Firings
The administration has summarily fired or put on leave thousands of federal employees.
One case concerning a fired government watchdog, Dellinger v. Bessent, was the first legal challenge that the administration appealed to the Supreme Court. In that appeal, the Supreme Court initially issued a preliminary ruling siding against the administration. The case was later dismissed with a ruling that the president was within his rights to fire the official.
Supreme Court ruling · July 23 Boyle v. Trump
In May, President Trump fired three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, a five-member group that monitors the safety of products like toys, cribs and electronics. A federal law allows them to be terminated for only “neglect of duty or malfeasance,” but the president gave no reasons for the firings. A federal judge initially reinstated the commission members, but in July the Supreme Court released an order allowing Mr. Trump to enforce the firing. The case is pending in an appeals court.
Appealed · July 18 Slaughter v. Trump
In March, President Trump fired Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, a Federal Trade commissioner, and her colleague Alvaro Bedoya as he asserted control over agencies that regulate companies and workplaces. The move challenged longstanding legal precedent that members of the F.T.C. can be fired for only a narrow set of reasons. A federal court ruled that Mr. Trump’s firing of Slaughter was illegal. Bedoya’s claim was dismissed in July after he resigned from the commission in June. The Trump administration has appealed the case.
Storch v. Hegseth
Shortly after taking office, President Trump fired the inspectors general for several federal agencies and departments, in defiance of a law that requires presidents to give Congress 30 days’ notice before removing any inspector general, along with reasons for the firing. Eight of the fired independent watchdog officials sued, saying their removals were illegal.
Comans v. Executive Office of the President Gordon v. Executive Office of the President Harper v. Bessent American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump Doe 1-5 v. U.S.A. Brown v. Trump Goodman v. Lutnick Desai v. Kennedy Doe 1 v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence New York v. Kennedy Leblanc v. U.S. Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board Perlmutter v. Blanche New York v. McMahon Somerville Public Schools v. Trump Rhode Island v. Trump National Nurses United v. Kennedy Grundmann v. Trump Samuels v. Trump Dismissed · undefined NaN Doe v. Rollins Wiley v. Kennedy Jewell v. Jagadesan Maryland v. U.S.D.A. Corporation for Public Broadcasting v. Trump National Academy of Education v. Department of Education Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Widakuswara v. Lake Victim Rights Law Center v. U.S. Department of Education National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought American Federation of Teachers v. Goldstein Pueblo of Isleta v. Secretary of the Department of the Interior Wilcox v. Trump Comans v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Doe v. Collins Carter v. U.S. Department of Education American Federation of Government Employees v. Noem American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management Gober v. Collins Government Accountability Project v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management Harris v. Bessent National Treasury Employees Union v. Trump American Federation of Government Employees v. Trump Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Trump National Treasury Employees Union v. Trump Dismissed · July 25 American Federation of Government Employees v. Trump Dismissed · May 22 Schechter v. Collins Dismissed · March 28 Dellinger v. Bessent
President Trump moved to fire Hampton Dellinger, the head of the Office of Special Counsel. Dellinger sued, saying his removal was unlawful. In a subsequent appeal, judges sided with the Trump administration, effectively removing Dellinger from his position. He later dropped his case.
Show 39 more items + Climate and environment
Upon returning to office, President Trump said he was revoking several Biden-era environmental policies, including protections against drilling in certain areas along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, in the eastern Gulf of Mexico and in the Arctic.
New York v. Trump
On the first day of his second term, President Trump issued a memorandum that would halt all leasing of federal lands and waters for new wind farms pending a government review, and direct federal agencies to stop issuing permits for all wind farms. Seventeen states and the District of Columbia sued, saying the order was outside the president’s authority and contrary to existing laws such as the Clean Air Act.
Green & Healthy Homes Initiative v. EPA Friends of the Everglades v. Noem California v. U.S.A. Air Alliance Houston v. Trump Washington v. Trump Washington v. U.S. Department Of Transportation Lighthiser v. Trump Kapa’a, Conservation Council for Hawaii v. Trump The Sustainability Institute v. Trump Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council v. U.S.D.A. Environmental Defense Fund v. U.S. Department of Transportation Inclusiv v. EPA Environmental Defense Fund v. EPA Environmental Defense Fund v. U.S. Department of Interior Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York v. U.S.D.A. Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. Trump Show 7 more items + Funding cuts
President Trump has moved to freeze or terminate billions of dollars in federal funding for scientific research, mental health services, art programs, educational programs, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, school lunches, disaster preparedness, foreign assistance and transportation infrastructure.
Preliminary injunction · June 19 California v. U.S. Department of Transportation
The Department of Transportation announced that it would require states that receive its grants to adhere to the Trump administration’s immigration policies. Twenty states sued, saying that the administration’s requirements are unconstitutional and that “more people will die” if billions in federal transportation funding are withheld. In June, a federal judge blocked the administration’s move, concluding the requirement was unconstitutional.
Appealed · April 28 New York v. Trump
After the Trump administration sought to enact a sweeping freeze on federal funding to states, more than 20 sued the Office of Management and Budget, saying the freeze was unlawful. A judge later found that the White House had failed to comply with a temporary order to unfreeze the funds.
Appealed · Feb. 27 National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education v. Trump
President Trump issued executive orders seeking to ban diversity practices at certain educational institutions. A group of college diversity officers sued, saying the orders usurp Congress’s power and violate the Constitution.
Illinois v. FEMA
The Department of Homeland Security issued new rules requiring states and cities that receive grants for disaster preparation and recovery to adhere to the Trump administration’s immigration agenda or face the possibility of losing billions of dollars. A coalition of 20 state attorneys general sued the department and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, saying the requirements are illegal and will cause irreparable harm.
Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump Association of American Universities v. Department of Energy Building Materials Re-use Association V. EPA California v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FreeState Justice v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Planned Parenthood of Greater New York V. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Gopalan v. Allen Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence v. Kennedy Anchorage School District v. U.S. Department of Education Southern Education Foundation v. U.S. Department of Education Right To Be v. Bondi California v. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services California High-Speed Rail Authority v. U.S. Department of Transportation Amica Center for Immigrant Rights v. D.O.J. The Family Planning Association of Maine v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Washington v. FEMA California v. McMahon Vera Institute of Justice v. D.O.J. Thakur v. Trump City of Columbus v. Kennedy Launch Alaska v. Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research Urban Sustainability Directors Network v. U.S.D.A. Shapiro v. U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington v. United States Department of Education Tuscon v. Turner Appalachian Voices v. EPA New Jersey v. U.S. Office of Management and Budget National Fair Housing Alliance v. Department of Housing and Urban Development Massachusetts v. Kennedy American Public Health Association v. National Institutes of Health Board of Election for the Silver Consolidated Schools v. McMahon American Association of University Professors v. D.O.J. Maine v. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence v. Bondi Association of American Universities v. Department of Defense Hunger Free America v. Rollins Mid-Atlantic Equity Consortium v. U.S. Department of Education Association of American Universities v. National Science Foundation Elev8 Baltimore v. Corporation for National and Community Service PBS v. Trump National Public Radio v. Trump Rural Development Innovations Limited v. Marocco American Association of Physicians for Human Rights v. N.I.H. Chicago v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Oregon Council for the Humanities v. DOGE Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty v. Lake Association of American Medical Colleges v. N.I.H. Association of American Universities v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Massachusetts v. National Institutes of Health Maine v. Department of Agriculture Association for Education Finance and Policy v. McMahon Maryland v. Corporation for National and Community Service Washington State Association of Head Start and Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program v. Kennedy New York v. Department of Education Middle East Broadcasting Networks v. U.S.A. Radio Free Asia v. U.S.A. Harris County, Texas v. Kennedy American Bar Association v. D.O.J. Abramowitz v. Lake Opportunity Finance Network v. Citibank, N.A. President and Fellows of Harvard College v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Global Health Council v. Trump AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. U.S. Department of State Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A. Massachusetts Fair Housing Center v. Department of Housing and Urban Development American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-DeRemer American Educational Research Association v. U.S. Department of Education American Association of University Professors – Harvard Faculty Chapter v. D.O.J. New York v. U.S. Department of Education Colorado v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Rhode Island Latino Arts v. National Endowment for the Arts California v. U.S. Department of Education National Education Association v. U.S. Department of Education National Endowment for Democracy v. U.S.A. N.A.A.C.P. v. U.S.A American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education v. McMahon Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco Open Technology Fund v. Lake American Federation of Teachers v. U.S. Department of Education Solutions in Hometown Connections v. Noem Butterbee Farm v. U.S.D.A. Corporation for Public Broadcasting v. FEMA San Francisco Unified School District v. AmeriCorps Dismissed · June 12 Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Vought American Federation of Teachers v. U.S. Department of Education National Urban League v. Trump Personal Services Contractor Association v. Trump Shapiro v. U.S. Department of the Interior National Council of Nonprofits v. Office of Management and Budget Dismissed · June 24 Harris County, Texas v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Dismissed · April 14 Erie County New York v. The Corporation for National and Community Service Show 85 more items + Trans rights
Several lawsuits challenge the Trump administration’s moves to prohibit recognizing transgender people according to their gender identity.
Among the Trump administration policies challenged in various suits are efforts to place transgender women who are federal prisoners in men’s housing, end gender-transition medical treatments for inmates, bar trans people from the military, withhold federal funding from hospitals that offer gender-related treatment to patients younger than 19 and prevent transgender people from reflecting their gender identities on U.S. passports.
Appealed · April 2 Doe v. Bondi
President Trump issued an executive order requiring the Bureau of Prisons to house transgender women with male inmates and stop medical treatment related to gender transitions. Three transgender women in prison sued, saying they had a right to essential medical care and to be kept safe while incarcerated. A judge temporarily blocked the order, and the Trump administration has appealed the case.
Appealed · March 24 PFLAG v. Trump
With their parents and advocacy groups, six transgender people between the ages of 12 and 18 sued to block President Trump’s executive order that sought to restrict medical treatments for trans youths, arguing that it violated the Constitution. A judge temporarily ordered the administration to continue federal funding for hospitals that offer transition care for people under the age of 19, a decision the Trump administration has appealed.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Trump California v. D.O.J. Moe v. Trump Jones v. Bondi Aguilar Contreras v. Trump Orr v. Trump Moe v. Trump Brown v. Trump Schlacter v. U.S. Department of State Minnesota v. Trump Kingdom v. Trump Shilling v. Trump Talbott v. Trump Washington v. Trump Schiff v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management San Francisco AIDS Foundation v. Trump Dismissed · May 15 Ireland v. Hegseth Show 9 more items + Federal access restrictions
The White House has used its power over access to federal property to single out certain organizations for punishment, prompting legal action.
In one case, the Trump administration barred The Associated Press from certain events for its use of the term “Gulf of Mexico.” A federal judge said the administration’s move amounted to a violation of the First Amendment. An appeals court later ruled that the president can, for now, block the news outlet from small places such as the Oval Office or Air Force One.
Appealed · July 2 Perkins Coie v. D.O.J.
In March, President Trump issued an executive order seeking to punish the law firm Perkins Coie for working for Democrats during the 2016 presidential campaign. The order sought to strip its lawyers of security clearances and access to government buildings and officials. In May, a federal judge ruled that the order was unconstitutional and blocked the administration from enforcing it. The Trump administration has appealed the case.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr v. Executive Office of the President Jenner & Block v. D.O.J. American Bar Association v. Executive Office of the President Zaid v. Executive Office of the President Larrabee v. Trump Doe 1 v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Susman Godfrey v. Executive Office of the President Associated Press v. Budowich Tariffs
State officials, small businesses and political groups have sued the Trump administration over its tariff policy, contending that the president does not have the authority to impose tariffs on foreign goods without congressional approval.
Appealed · May 28 V.O.S. Selections v. Trump
In late May, a federal appeals court temporarily agreed to preserve many of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs on China and other U.S. trading partners. The move paused an earlier decision by a separate court that would have forced the White House to wind down duties deemed to be illegal.
Firedisc v. Trump Johanna Foods v. Executive Office of the President California v. Trump Learning Resources v. Trump Emily Ley Paper Inc. v. Trump Maple Trade Corporation v. U.S.A. Axle of Dearborn v. Department of Commerce G.K. Industries America v. U.S.A. Webber v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Princess Awesome v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection Dismissed · June 27 Chapter 1 v. U.S.A. Show 2 more items + Other suits Newsom v. Trump
After the Trump administration deployed National Guard troops in Los Angeles to respond to protests, a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration had illegally taken control of the state’s troops. He ordered them to return to taking orders from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. An appeals court subsequently stayed that decision, which means the National Guard forces will stay subject to Mr. Trump’s control for now.
Novedades y Servicios v. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network American Academy of Pediatrics v. Kennedy Silencer Shop Foundation v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives City of Seattle v. Trump American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Trump Azoria Capital v. Powell Lopez v. U.S.A. Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Kennedy Protect Democracy Project v. Office of Management and Budget Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget Rise Economy v. Vought New Jersey v. Bondi American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump Media Matters for America v. Federal Trade Commission Los Angeles Press Club v. Noem Texas Association of Money Services Businesses v. Bondi Dunn v. Austin Federal Education Association v. Trump Valuta Corporation v. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network New York v. National Science Foundation National Association of the Deaf v. Trump American Foreign Service Association v. Trump Pallek v. Rollins Fidelity National Financial v. Bessent Washington State Medical Association v. Kennedy King County v. Trump North America’s Building Trades Unions v. Department of Defense American Library Association v. Sonderling Washington v. Trump National Treasury Employees Union v. Trump California v. Trump Equal Means Equal v. Trump Taylor v. Trump N.A.A.C.P. v. U.S. Department of Education Rona v. Trump E.K. v. Department of Defense Education Activity Sierra Club v. EPA Flowers Title Companies v. Bessent Smith v. Trump BlueRibbon Coalition v. Bureau of Land Management DAI Global v. U.S.A. Oliver v. Trump Morgan v. McMahon Price v. U.S.A. Lafayette Square v. U.S. Small Business Administration Does 1-9 v. D.O.J. Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Duffy Dismissed · July 29 Planned Parenthood of Greater New York v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Plaintiffs won · July 2 Doctors for America v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management Dismissed · June 3 Democratic National Committee v. Trump Dismissed · May 13 Iverson v. Trump Show 42 more items +