Ghislaine Maxwell told Justice Department she never saw Trump do anything concerning with Epstein, report says

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ghislaine-maxwell-trump-epstein-files-todd-blanche-b2802917.html

27 comments

  3. well of course not. him raping kids wasn’t a concern to her.

  6. Wow someone angling for a pardon/commutation says something that will help her receive a pardon/commutation. News and sports at 11.

  8. She’s a seemingly remorseless convicted sex trafficker and abuser. What could she possibly find concerning?

  10. Convicted felon with a record of perjury corroborates lies of known con artist, grifter, felon and pedophile.

  11. See, guys? The perjurer that trump is doing favors for said trump never did anything wrong. Can we finally stop talking about the unusual number of times his name appears in the epstein files? Or the prior affidavits alleging sexual misconduct? Or the literal judgement of sexual misconduct? Or the numerous accusations spanning decades of uhhhhh, oh, right, sexual misconduct?

  12. Why would a child rapist find anything concerning with the rape of children. I can’t believe the media is running this shit. Fuck this bullshit.

  13. NEWS FLASH

    “Someone with no morals says other person with no morals did nothing wrong. More at eleven.”

  14. Define “concerning”. What would be concerning to an enabler and participant of an underage sex trafficking operation? That they will be exposed? That they will not receive payment or favors for their vile “services”? Their definition of “concerning” does not match the average person’s definition. I can see that she would not be concerned with chomolini ratting them out or not paying, I can’t see her being concerned with the wellbeing of the underage victims. If she cared, she wouldn’t be a part of it. Release the Epstein files!

  16. okay well if that’s true, then there shouldn’t be any problem releasing the completes and undoctored Epstein files right?

  17. Charged with two counts of perjury, so I’m sure she’s super credible about this, no ulterior motive or anything like that. Release the files with only the names of VICTIMS redacted and it’s all good. [https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/ghislaine-maxwell-charged-manhattan-federal-court-conspiring-jeffrey-epstein-sexually](https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/ghislaine-maxwell-charged-manhattan-federal-court-conspiring-jeffrey-epstein-sexually)

  19. That’s because she knew the assignment without having to be told what it was. She knows Trump extremely well because she facilitated his rape of little girls, so she was well aware of his transactional nature. She knows it’s the only way she’ll see the light of day.

  20. So Ghislaine Maxwell, who lied through the entirety of her trial and was found guilty of trafficking, told Trumps personal lawyer that she never saw peDonald do anything ‘concerning’?

    The rape of minors didn’t concern Maxwell tbf so even if she was taken at face value it’s hardly clearing the Rapist in Chiefs name is it?

  22. 1) She was convicted of perjury so she cannot be trusted at all

    2) the victims don’t want maxwell to testify or get a pardon in exchange for her “information”

  23. Great job Trump voters, this is on YOU. All of it. You’re just as disgusting as these fucking monsters that are about to walk.

  24. That must be why Trump is working so hard to kill the Epstein story and NOT release the files🤔

  25. Cool, if that’s the case should be no problem to release the Epstein files (with redactions for the victims).

  26. Remember she’s guilty of perjury.

    How about we ask the victims?

  27. Prisoner desperate for release meets in private with people who have the power to release her.

    Prisoner gets moved to better conditions.

    Prisoner says no wrong doing by guy with pardon power.

    Prisoner gets released.

    If MAGA buys this, we’re too stupid to survive and I hope our country burns to the ground.

Comments are closed.