https://www.themirror.com/news/royals/prince-william-title-sir-commentator-1316219?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target

The royal commentator said: “Now, for me, we hear a lot more now that more and more allegations, and that’s all that you can say about William, are coming out.”

He added: “It’s coming out that his staff find him, at times, very aggressive, and I know one of his many supporters, for his housing charity, and this guy is a volunteer, and he was telling me that William is constantly on to him all day, all night, saying, ‘How much money have we made? How much money have we made?’”

In addition to being aggressive, Pelham Turner says William’s temperament has changed, that in his 20s and 30s he was easy going, but now that he’s in his 40s, and his eye on the throne, he is much more formal, insisting people address him as “Sir,” versus using his first name.

Posted by ButIDigress79

5 comments

  1. I think this is yet more distraction from the Andrew the nonce.

    There have been stories since he was a little boy that William is quick to anger, that is nothing new.

  2. Ah, yes. Right on cue. William is bad, lets forget about Andrew and Harry and all the horrible things they’ve done. Let focus on how William is ‘being agressive’ by calling his staff.

  3. Yeah, so, yet again, we are trying to shift the attention away from Andrew by any means, right?
    I sincerely hope it won’t work, because frankly, the RF (meaning CHARLES) should’ve dealt with him a long time ago.

    (Like, seriously? He *asks* how much money has the charity event made, and that is the bad thing? Is the guy kidding?)

    Also gotta love the ‘he’s so much more formal now’ – yeah, couldn’t it *possibly* be that he’s so much more formal with *people who leak stories to the The Mirror*?

  4. The question for me is this: what exactly is meant by “aggressive?” Do they mean that he’s an overbearing micromanager who’s riding his employees hard or do they mean that he is interpersonally aggressive toward his staff?

    I don’t think either are *great,* but “William is a dickbag boss” is a different story than “William has anger issues.” It could be either or both, but even having read the article, I’m not sure what they mean..

  5. > William is being “aggressive” with staff and insistent on being called “Sir,” with the former royal photographer saying, “There’s something going on with William.”

    Weird to lump these two things together.

    If he’s being aggressive to staff, that’s awful and he should absolutely be called out on it.

    But Charles is sick and William is closer to the throne than he’s ever been. Best to start getting people used to addressing him as “sir” now. because you can’t really be on, “hey Wills!” terms with the King.

Comments are closed.