After Russian EW messed with it’s signal. Russia doesn’t have enough air defence to wage war in Ukraine and sufficiently defend their own country and Russian citizens are paying the price since Putin chooses to defend military and industrial targets over defending citizens. Womp womp.
*the residence of rashists military chauvinists, members of the local cell of putinist fascists horde.
Bada BOOM 💥
Nice
After years of striking only military targets, suddenly, before an important meeting between dumbly dee and dumbly doo, an unnamed UAV, definitely full of sugar, strikes a civilian target.
Nothing to see here, move along.
“Sanitary losses” would say putin: “It’s OK, this tango can’t be danced a different way”.
It pains me to say this, but it was clearly shot down. By another drone. SLAVA UKRAINI!🇺🇦
It is probably lost due to EW. The building it struck does not seem like the desired target.
Wow you could shoot that thing down with a rock and a sling, it is that slow
We’ll have to see what the armed forces of Ukraine says about it. It could have run into headwinds and run out of gas but it seemed like it was controlled flight. Perhaps it was an FSB command post or headquarters. Hopefully more information will be forthcoming.
Integration of synchronization technology and correlation between the video stream from the on-board camera of the unmanned aerial vehicle and archived satellite images stored in the internal memory of the drone.
Here’s a 2-year-old article talking about why the Wagner group took Rostov. Remember Prigozhin?
Just before pootin meets the dumpster in Alaska, a civilian building is hit by a drone.
But it’s ok to send nearly 2000 drones and missiles a night into Ukraine. Got it.
Fieseler Storch ahh drone
I can’t help but feel that the drone was provoked and had no choice but to attack.
Edit: I stand corrected… they indeed uses small aircraft as drones, which for some reason I simply forgot about…
WTF, im shocked to see noone here seems to notice the difference between a drone and a cessna-like (Cessna 172 looks close to this) airplane…
This isn’t a UAV, it’s way to big to be the ones Ukraine uses that look like a plane. Those also don’t have the support rods inderdaad the wing like a Cessna does…
Just a plane with technical issues crashing in a building…
more please
Can you at least put the floating text *NOT* on top of the part everybody wants to watch? I will *never* click or go to whatever text you have over your video.
Floating texts get downvoted.
If only russia had not invaded….
damn that looks like a cessna
Noones shooting at it, likely another false flag.
I’m going to completely disregard the comments about EW and targeting and ask a technical question about the small planes used as drones.
If you want to squeeze out as much performance as possible, be it longer range or larger warhead, wouldn’t it make sense to modify the landing gear to fall away once airborne? It’s not like its ever going to land again. It just seems like if so much energy is put into these attacks you would want to make the best use of your vehicles, no holds barred.
Drop the wheels and strut and put what? Another 100? 200 lbs of explosives? Or add no extra explosives and add however much range that buys.
Russian sources published this as an EW interception so I’m not sure why OP would choose to editorialize here.
Your country’s military is dogshit if you can’t defend a city from a Cessna full of explosives that is doing 42 MPH
28 comments
After Russian EW messed with it’s signal. Russia doesn’t have enough air defence to wage war in Ukraine and sufficiently defend their own country and Russian citizens are paying the price since Putin chooses to defend military and industrial targets over defending citizens. Womp womp.
*the residence of rashists military chauvinists, members of the local cell of putinist fascists horde.
Bada BOOM 💥
Nice
After years of striking only military targets, suddenly, before an important meeting between dumbly dee and dumbly doo, an unnamed UAV, definitely full of sugar, strikes a civilian target.
Nothing to see here, move along.
“Sanitary losses” would say putin: “It’s OK, this tango can’t be danced a different way”.
That football song “[it’s coming home ](https://youtu.be/RJqimlFcJsM?si=cXjCBhfySjQ35D62)” springs to mind
It pains me to say this, but it was clearly shot down. By another drone. SLAVA UKRAINI!🇺🇦
It is probably lost due to EW. The building it struck does not seem like the desired target.
Wow you could shoot that thing down with a rock and a sling, it is that slow
We’ll have to see what the armed forces of Ukraine says about it. It could have run into headwinds and run out of gas but it seemed like it was controlled flight. Perhaps it was an FSB command post or headquarters. Hopefully more information will be forthcoming.
Integration of synchronization technology and correlation between the video stream from the on-board camera of the unmanned aerial vehicle and archived satellite images stored in the internal memory of the drone.
Here’s a 2-year-old article talking about why the Wagner group took Rostov. Remember Prigozhin?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/24/rostov-on-don-why-russian-city-targeted-wagner-group
he he, good boy
Look at the great big….FALSE FLAG.
Just before pootin meets the dumpster in Alaska, a civilian building is hit by a drone.
But it’s ok to send nearly 2000 drones and missiles a night into Ukraine. Got it.
Fieseler Storch ahh drone
I can’t help but feel that the drone was provoked and had no choice but to attack.
Edit: I stand corrected… they indeed uses small aircraft as drones, which for some reason I simply forgot about…
WTF, im shocked to see noone here seems to notice the difference between a drone and a cessna-like (Cessna 172 looks close to this) airplane…
This isn’t a UAV, it’s way to big to be the ones Ukraine uses that look like a plane. Those also don’t have the support rods inderdaad the wing like a Cessna does…
Just a plane with technical issues crashing in a building…
more please
Can you at least put the floating text *NOT* on top of the part everybody wants to watch? I will *never* click or go to whatever text you have over your video.
Floating texts get downvoted.
If only russia had not invaded….
damn that looks like a cessna
Noones shooting at it, likely another false flag.
I’m going to completely disregard the comments about EW and targeting and ask a technical question about the small planes used as drones.
If you want to squeeze out as much performance as possible, be it longer range or larger warhead, wouldn’t it make sense to modify the landing gear to fall away once airborne? It’s not like its ever going to land again. It just seems like if so much energy is put into these attacks you would want to make the best use of your vehicles, no holds barred.
Drop the wheels and strut and put what? Another 100? 200 lbs of explosives? Or add no extra explosives and add however much range that buys.
Russian sources published this as an EW interception so I’m not sure why OP would choose to editorialize here.
Your country’s military is dogshit if you can’t defend a city from a Cessna full of explosives that is doing 42 MPH
Was that a civilian target?
Great air defence. Unbelievable.
Comments are closed.