Ex-Israeli intelligence chief said 50 Palestinians must die for every 7 October victim | It does not matter if they are children, said Aharon Haliva

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/17/israeli-general-aharon-haliva-palestinians-7-october-gaza

Posted by TISETDSE

7 comments
  1. These mfs are actually nazis reincarnated, it’s crazy how zionists can call people who criticise israel nazis with straight faces meanwhile people are getting arrested in ENGLAND for criticising them and Israeli politicians are opening discussing the plans for lebensr-i mean greater Israel

  2. Questions were asked that were refused to answer, saying “What is the ratio to palestinian lives to israeli lives?”

    It’s funny that they’ve literally talked about this very thing.

  3. More an more genocidal intent. They were saying this shit for years seems like the last few months they’ve toned it down. Not that the threat of consequence is one they worry about with the US sanctioning the ICJ

  4. Well he’s obviously an Hamas operative trying to discredit Israel/s

    But seriously, he’s saying the quiet bit out loud and will get away with it because it’s apparently not being really reported on in Israel 

    >Haliva’s comments about mass killings of Palestinian civilians did not make headlines in other mainstream Israeli outlets. They focused instead on his criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu and warnings of systemic failures in security and intelligence.

    I think it’s trite and a bad take to compare Israel to the Nazi’s but… I’m genuinely reminded of how ordinary German’s blinkered themselves to ignore the Holocaust.

  5. 01:43:20 – After what they did at the massacre? It’s only an eye for an eye.

    01:43:24 – An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.

    When I spoke about ratios, it was to elaborate on this fact that demanding sacrifices, retaliation, perceived comeuppance does nothing but perpetuate an unwanted cycle of violence. Also yet more indications of genocidal intent, flagrant disregard for international law. It’s only OK when the shoe is on your foot, huh?

Comments are closed.