If Ukraine had not voluntarily given up its nuclear weapons, Russia would never have dared to capture Ukrainian territory or begged for protection from America and the EU.

If America or the EU gave nukes to Ukraine today, the war would end in a single day. But they will never do that because they are happy supplying other weapons, ensuring the war continues for a long period—profiting America’s weapons industry.

NATO will never truly protect your borders. In the end, Ukraine will have to surrender to Russia under pressure from the US and the West. The better option? Ukraine must CREATE its own NUCLEAR POWER. If Ukraine fears NATO isolation or sanctions, then don’t give a f#uk about NATO nations.
Take the example of India and Pakistan: In 1998, both countries conducted their first nuclear weapon tests. Yes, they faced isolation and sanctions, but those were largely lifted within a year or two. After 1998, India and Pakistan have never had a major border dispute till now.

And if you argue about nuclear maintenance cost, then what would you prefer: the expense of maintaining nukes or the far greater cost of losing your sovereignty to Russia??

That’s the importance of nuclear deterrence. Nukes have the power to bring PEACE if you have it then you get It.

by Kingsalyer_09

8 comments

  1. So true!

    BTW, maintaining nukes would be cheaper than the cost of the current war.

  3. We should give Ukraine enough nukes to devastate Russia, to change their negotiating position. 

    And then welcome them into NATO on top of that.

    With Ukraine building their own long range nuclear capable missiles, that may actually be a plan. It’s also a capability European armies need, with the US being a doubtful ally under Trump.

  4. “while the third-largest nuclear weapons stockpile was based on Ukrainian soil at the time of independence, it was not a capability Ukraine had ownership of or could have usefully maintained and utilised in the longer term. Therefore, it would not have made a credible nuclear deterrent”

  5. > If America or the EU gave nukes to Ukraine today, the war would end in a single day.

    How should that work? Would Pootin be less afraid of his shitty life if Ukraine had nukes? Because this is the only driving force behind the war.
     

  6. Haven’t Pakistan and India fought? I don’t know how closely you’re following this, but there have been recent skirmishes, not counting 2025, and there’s been quite a bit of damage.

  8. Honestly choose nuke, do not trust NATO 
    In the worst case it became WWIII 
    In the « best » case nothing happen 
    Better MAD than to be Russian no ? 

Comments are closed.