Intelligence Chief Gabbard Slammed for Identifying Undercover CIA Officer

https://www.thedailybeast.com/intelligence-chief-tulsi-gabbard-slammed-for-identifying-undercover-cia-officer/

37 comments
  1. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been condemned for sharing the name of an undercover CIA officer on social media.

    On Aug. 19, Gabbard posted a memo on X that included a list of 37 current and former officials who had been stripped of their security clearances.

    Also included on the list was a senior CIA officer who had been working undercover, though Gabbard was unaware of this at the time.

    Read the full story, [here](https://www.thedailybeast.com/intelligence-chief-tulsi-gabbard-slammed-for-identifying-undercover-cia-officer/).

  2. Slammed? She should be tried for treason, but I guess slammed is all we get.

  3. She’s doing exactly what her Russian handlers have demanded of her. 

  4. I suspect she has exposed a lot of intelligence assets and informants.

  5. From the same administration that brought us WhiskeyLeaks, we get Chief Gabs-Too-Damn-Much.

  6. Trump did something like that his first term. I think he told Putin about Israeli agents, and Israel had to pull them out before they were captured.

  7. > Also included on the list was a senior CIA officer who had been working undercover, though Gabbard was unaware of this at the time, The Wall Street Journal reported. However, sources told the newspaper that Gabbard did not consult with the intelligence agency before posting the list of names to her 762,000 online followers.

    First you topple free unbiased media so the networks to organize a resistance no longer work.

    Then you make it impossible for opposing parties to organize by having them heavily censored and by having them under surveillance.

    Then you replace the upper branches of the military and scientific communities with loyalists, and have the military and scientific community do a lot of small things so they all blend together and misuse cannot be spotted as easily.

    Finally you target the intelligence agencies and replace them with loyalists so that every feasible method of resistance beyond the working class citizens is gone.

    Straight out of Hitler’s playbook.

  8. It’s nauseating how these chodes are hard-wired to their social media accounts. I’m in a small business with eight people, someone gets in trouble. I don’t even hear about it. That’s private. Tulsi fires people for not being sycophantic enough, and she posts it on Twitter? Come on!

  9. Government officials have no business using social media in any official capacity.

  10. People: Only Bernie can save us!

    Bernie: I’m endorsing Hilary and I’m basically begging you to vote for her.

    Also people: ✅ Tulsi Gabbard

    Jfc.

  11. I wonder how many officers/analysts/agents will have been killed under this administration when it’s all said and done? Should we set the over/under at 15?

  12. >The undercover CIA officer had worked in intelligence posts for more than 20 years and served as an expert on Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council between 2014 and 2017, according to the WSJ.

    While we can’t rule out sheer stupidity, we also can’t rule out her doing it for her other boss.

  13. Ah, yes, writing about what should be a career ending scandal as if it’s gossip. Classic.

  14. These are the moments I wish the movies were real, and she outed Jason Bourne, and he decides to get his revenge on this regime by bringing them down and releasing the epstein files!

  15. When the Bush admin did this, it was a crime and someone was going to go to prison over it, but was pardoned.

  16. The Republicans, continueing the tradition of burn-noticing it’s agents.

  17. Slammed! Bombshell! Same shit diff. Day until someone holds these people accountable it’s all BS

  18. Remember when the “NOC list” was the central macguffin in the first Mission Impossible movie? Fast forward to 2025 and a similar list is posted on Twitter.

  19. Hmmm, who would like a big list of former operatives/officials who had high level security clearances? This is insane. She is literally putting these peoples’ lives at risk.

    If this isn’t a security violation in and of itself, it certainly should be.

    Hard to interpret as anything other than you better be loyal to the current administration or in no way be connected to the former administration, or else.

    Note, these people probably need security clearances for their current government contracting jobs. This is purely to extract revenge.

  20. Congress has to step up and investigate/prosecute the incompetence and treasonous behavior of Trump and his cabinet.

  21. Does anyone have a chart for this?

    Is slammed higher or lower on the news article buzzword list than blasted, destroys, wrecked?

  22. the US have a complete set of Russian Agents running the country and a slew of idiotic supporters enabling them

  23. So you’re telling my that the current administration is actively sabotaging intelligence agencies in order do remove as much internal opposition as possible? Yeah right..

  24. She’s clearly an asset assigned to destroy our intelligence capabilities

Comments are closed.