Trump Eyes Private Armies for Ukraine Instead of US Peacekeepers

https://united24media.com/latest-news/trump-eyes-private-armies-for-ukraine-instead-of-us-peacekeepers-11240

by UNITED24Media

16 comments

  1. If I were Ukraine I’d refuse this. It’s a trojan horse, there are no real legal boundaries for such private armies.

  2. I was honesty wondering why Ukraine wouldn’t hire substantial forces everywhere. Europe has enough money to pay mercenaries for Ukraine.

    What are the drawbacks? I assume there are, but what are they?

  5. Private armies whose stakeholders include prominent Republican legislators.

    Tale old as time…

  7. He’s just seeing monetary opportunities, he doesn’t care one bit

  8. Putin laughing his dick off at these half arsed security guarantees

  9. Is he willing to give the private contractors security guarantees in case they are attacked by Russian forces?

  10. There aren’t enough mercenaries in the world for this

  11. Trump *eyes*…

    Whichever “journalist” wrote that headline should feel bad and be driven from the profession.

  12. What’s the point of PMC being deployed to Ukraine? The whole point of deploying NATO peacekeepers is to provide an obstacle that Russia doesn’t want to tangle with, attack the peacekeepers and you risk war with NATO.

  14. People are losing their shit over this, but Blackwater has been doing stuff in the Middle East forever now. Yes, they are legally more “questionable”, but that’s a two-way street. If they ice a few Russians, it’s not really “America” that did that. Russia has been using Wagner to troll the world for years now with plausible deniability.

Comments are closed.