They’re not going to request ID verification to access the English Language Dictionary, are they?
Can we have a meme about something new?
Pretty sure this page is full of Russian bot’s trying to stir more shit up. post after post
bold of you to imply the move has an form of leftist drive when the entire law is designed to enrich capitalists by extracting and selling data
I think the social experiment of complete public anonymity in the online domain has failed tbh. I’ve been a part of it since day one, and I think it’s genuinely unravelled society.
This is obviously throwing the baby out with the bathwater, but pretending all is well and good in internet land and that this has come out of nowhere and is purely malevolent is ridiculous.
Already downloaded a copy and hosted on my home server.
Take that Starmer and your voyeuristic ways.
Nothing to do with, as an example, Wikipedia having that Israel killed Yemen’s Prime Minister in their top news.
But the BBC is reporting the recovery of an Israeli Hostage’s body as apparently more important news.
Don’t comply with propaganda? PORN SITE!
IngSoc were fascists, not Stalinist communists. Starmer could aspire to be Stalinist, maybe then he might have the spine to deal with the water companies properly. As it stands he might be a rather pathetic fascist propped up by focus groups long enough for Wes Streeting (also a complete bastard) to sharpen his backstabber.
Not this misinformation shit again. The reason Wikipedia’s challenge was dismissed is because precisely fuck-all has happened with Wikipedia. Literally nothing has changed, there was nothing to rule on, so there was no reason for the courts to take it any further.
9 comments
They’re not going to request ID verification to access the English Language Dictionary, are they?
Can we have a meme about something new?
Pretty sure this page is full of Russian bot’s trying to stir more shit up. post after post
bold of you to imply the move has an form of leftist drive when the entire law is designed to enrich capitalists by extracting and selling data
I think the social experiment of complete public anonymity in the online domain has failed tbh. I’ve been a part of it since day one, and I think it’s genuinely unravelled society.
This is obviously throwing the baby out with the bathwater, but pretending all is well and good in internet land and that this has come out of nowhere and is purely malevolent is ridiculous.
Already downloaded a copy and hosted on my home server.
Take that Starmer and your voyeuristic ways.
Nothing to do with, as an example, Wikipedia having that Israel killed Yemen’s Prime Minister in their top news.
But the BBC is reporting the recovery of an Israeli Hostage’s body as apparently more important news.
Don’t comply with propaganda? PORN SITE!
IngSoc were fascists, not Stalinist communists. Starmer could aspire to be Stalinist, maybe then he might have the spine to deal with the water companies properly. As it stands he might be a rather pathetic fascist propped up by focus groups long enough for Wes Streeting (also a complete bastard) to sharpen his backstabber.
Not this misinformation shit again. The reason Wikipedia’s challenge was dismissed is because precisely fuck-all has happened with Wikipedia. Literally nothing has changed, there was nothing to rule on, so there was no reason for the courts to take it any further.
Comments are closed.