Data from the World Bank suggests that extreme poverty has declined dramatically over the past four decades, from 47% of the world’s population in 1981 to around 10% today.
This narrative is based on the World Bank’s method of calculating the share of people who live on less than US$3 per day in 2021 prices. This is adjusted for general price differences between countries (what’s known as purchasing power parity, or PPP).
But a growing body of literature argues that the World Bank’s PPP-based method has a major empirical limitation. The problem is that it does not account for the cost of meeting basic needs in any given context. Having more than US$3 PPP does not guarantee that a person can afford the specific goods and services that are necessary for survival in a particular location.
In recent years, scholars have developed what they argue is a more accurate method for measuring extreme poverty. This is done by comparing people’s incomes to the prices of essential goods (specifically food, shelter, clothing and fuel) in each country.
This approach is known as the “basic needs poverty line” (BNPL), and it more closely reflects what the original concept of extreme poverty was intended to measure. There is robust data from household consumption surveys and consumer prices covering the period from 1980-2011.
The BNPL data indicates that the story of global poverty over the past few decades is more complex – and troubling – than the World Bank narrative suggests.
This data indicates that between 1980 and 2011, the global extreme poverty rate declined by only six percentage points, from 23% to 17%. During the same period, the number of people in extreme poverty actually increased, from 1.01 billion to 1.20 billion.
What’s more, the alleviation of poverty has not been steady. In the 1980s and 1990s, an additional one billion people were thrown into extreme poverty. This occurred during the period when market reforms were implemented across most of the global south (developing countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America), often under pressure from western-controlled financial institutions. There was improvement throughout the 2000s, but progress has ultimately been slow and shallow.
https://theconversation.com/has-extreme-poverty-really-plunged-since-the-1980s-new-analysis-suggests-not-261144
Posted by Naurgul
4 comments
>This [data indicates that](https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/04/30/new-research-on-global-poverty/) between 1980 and 2011, the global extreme poverty rate declined by only six percentage points, from 23% to 17%. During the same period, the number of people in extreme poverty actually increased, from 1.01 billion to 1.20 billion.
Global population in 1980 was 4.4 billion. We are now at 8.2 billion. So the number of human beings on Earth during that period pretty much doubled and yet the number of people living in extreme poverty went from 1/4 of the population in 1980 to 1/8 of the population in 2025. Seems like a significant improvement to me.
Also:
Infant mortality rate globally in 1980 was 64 death per 1,000 births. In 2025 it was 27 ([SOURCE](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN?end=2023&start=1980))
Global life expectancy in 1980 was 62 years. It is now 75 years. ([SOURCE](https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/wld/world/life-expectancy#:~:text=World%20life%20expectancy%20for%202022,a%202.46%25%20increase%20from%202021))
Access to potable water went from 60% globally in 1980 to 75% now ([SOURCE](https://data.unicef.org/topic/water-and-sanitation/drinking-water/)).
Maybe poverty has not declined as dramatically as the world bank claims, but the data does not support that it has been nearly stagnant either.
I can’t remember the details of this, and would love if someone could remind me, but what i do remember is that the world bank data was constantly adjusted and manipulated over the years to reflect that narrative of reducing poverty. I think it was the quantitative definition of poverty that they kept changing?
I thought PPP was supposed to capture the variable relative per country affordability of necessities… isn’t that its’ whole deal?
How does it miss what the BNPL is capturing?
I would imagine a lot of that would be 800 million people being lifted out of poverty in China over the last four years.
[China](https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience)
Comments are closed.