Belgisch wetsvoorstel voor dataopslag is “feitelijk verbod op chatapp Signal” en dat zorgt voor ongenoegen

11 comments
  1. I dont get why people think Signal is safer over Whattsapp or other apps. Yes, it doesnt save your metadata like other do… but that doesnt mean goverments cant know what you are doing or saying.

    Signal runs on Amazons servers and are installed on google- & apples phones… all companies that participated in NSA Prism surveillance program, in which these companies gave the NSA full acces to their servers in exchange for their help in defending against foreign cyberattacks.

    Wikileaks showed in 2017, that the NSA had already toos to hack apps like Signal and Whattapp if they ever wanted. They can bypass the encryption of whattsapp, signall, telegram,… (https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/) the same way the TOR project was hacked by the NSA. Snowden always claimed it was the ultimate safeheaven against the NSA and looked what happened.

    Why does nobody ask why Signals founder Moxie Marlinspike of “Open Whisper Systems” was payed over 3 million $ by the NSA?

    You have to give Signal your phonenumber and acces to your phonebook. How long does it take google to connect that number to your facebookaccount and other info you have stored on their servers?

    Apps like these give people the false idea of internetsafety. Its gives gouverments a place to hide their stuff and let normal people the idea they are safe from harm, eventhough the gouverment is still tracking you.

  2. Vanaf nu elke mail cc ook naar de minister sturen. ‘t Zal rap gedaan zijn.

    Fuckers, alles willen weten.

  3. Het is gemakkelijk om wetten te maken die de privacy beperken, wanneer je weet dat je door uw positie als politicus die wetten gemakkelijk zelf kan omzeilen. ‘All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others’

  4. Ik gebruik zelf deze App niet, maar het is met onzin zoals dit dat we beetje bij beetje onze vrijheid verliezen. Schrikwekkend gewoon dat ze echt alles willen kunnen inzien. Dit allemaal onder het mom van veiligheid.

  5. van quickenborne is wereldvreemd en er is zeker een hoekje af. Wat doet die nozem eigenlijk nog in de politiek, we gaan er nog absurde wetten aan overhouden.

Leave a Reply