The Miran appointment, while certain to be rubber-stamped by the Republican majority in the Senate, is controversial because he has said he won’t resign from his role as chair of Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers, instead taking an unpaid leave of absence.
Miran was nominated to fill the remaining term of former governor Adriana Kugler, who resigned last month, even though her term wasn’t scheduled to end until January 31 next year. It is unclear if he will remain on the board beyond that date.
Trump is still trying to fire Cook on the basis of an allegation made on social media that hasn’t been proven and now appears to have been disproved.Credit: AP
By remaining a key Trump adviser while serving as a governor, Miran, regarded as the architect of the administration’s more contentious economic policies – including the tariffs and Trump’s efforts to bring the Fed under the administration’s control – would not be an independent in an institution that Congress designed to be independent of politics.
Unlike Waller or Bowman, appointed by Trump but not part of the administration (although Waller is on the short list to be the next Fed chair and therefore wouldn’t want to be offside with Trump), he’d clearly be Trump’s main man inside the Fed.
The Cook affair is also tainted. Trump purported to fire her last month, via a social media post, after the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Bill Pulte, alleged (in a social media post, of course) that she had named two separate properties as her principal place of residence in loan documents, which may have enabled her to borrow more cheaply.
Loading
She’s not been charged with anything and can only be sacked “for cause,” which is generally thought to mean that the official has done something seriously wrong while in office.
The initial judgment that the administration is appealing was that Trump’s justification for firing Cooke didn’t meet the threshold for sufficient cause, in part because the alleged actions occurred before she was a governor.
As it happens, what Pulte and Trump have alleged may not even have occurred.
First Reuters, and then a string of major media outlets, have said Cook described her second property as “a vacation home,” not as her principal place of residence, in loan documents they have seen. Cook’s lawyers have said any errors in the loan documents, if there were errors, were unintentional and might be the results of clerical errors.
If the documents Reuters and others have sighted – which appear to be loan estimates provided by a credit union – exist then, regardless of what the final loan documents showed, the lender would have been aware that the loan was for a holiday home, not as her primary residence.
In other words, Trump is still trying to fire Cook on the basis of an allegation made on social media that hasn’t been proven and now appears to have been disproved. The allegations are a pretext to try to open another spot on the Fed board for a Trump appointee.
If Trump can gain a majority of the seven-person board, he would then be in a position to remake the FOMC, where the remaining members are the president of the New York Fed and the presidents of four of the Fed’s 12 regional banks, who serve on a rotating basis. The Fed’s board can veto those appointments.
The White House, with a president who has said he wants the federal funds rate cut by three percentage points, would be able to dictate US monetary policy, ending three quarters of a century of the US central bank’s independence.
When the Fed last met, in July, for the first time in more than 30 years there were two governors – Waller and Bowman – who dissented from the majority’s decision to hold rates steady. The interest this week will be in whether Miran, Waller and Bowman, argue for something more than the 25 basis points cut expected.
The majority is likely to be conservative – there could be some who argue for rates to remain on hold – because, while the jobs market appears to be shrinking and the unemployment rate is rising, the full effects of Trump’s tariffs are yet to show up in the data.
That’s because of the on-off-on way they were implemented, which allowed companies to build up inventories of goods before the tariffs took effect. With the main “reciprocal” tariffs finally going live last month, their impact on prices will progressively show up over the rest of this year and beyond.
The worst-case outlook for the Fed is one of stagflation: low economic growth, or even a recession, while the inflation rate remains high. Trump’s trade wars and his immigration policies make it possible that there could be, simultaneously, rising unemployment and rising inflation.
If the Fed acts independently and as it has throughout this year, it will move cautiously, testing the economic environment with a modest rate cut and then waiting for fresh data before it decides its next move.
Loading
The extent to which Trump’s transparent assault on its independence has created a political context to this week’s rates decision and a need for the board to reassert that independence is another motivation for the Fed to make it clear that its decision-making hasn’t been compromised by Trump’s coercion.
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.