
https://www.rte.ie/news/2025/0915/1533417-soldier-f-bloody-sunday/
Former British soldier goes on trial over Bloody Sunday murders
A former British soldier has gone on trial charged with murdering two men on Bloody Sunday in Co Derry in 1972.
Soldier F is also accused of five counts of attempted murder.
He denies the charges.
Soldier F appeared in Court 12 of Belfast Crown Court this morning.
The former paratrooper has been granted anonymity by the court. He was shielded from the view of the Bloody Sunday families and the media by a large black curtain draped around the dock.
Earlier the families and supporters had walked to court for the commencement of the trial.
Soldier F is accused of the murder of William McKinney and James Wray, two of the 13 people shot dead on Bloody Sunday.
They were among civil rights protesters fired on by members of the British Parachute Regiment following a march on 30 January 1972 in the city's Bogside area.
Thirteen people were shot dead on the day, a fourteenth died later.
A similar number of people were injured.
'Long-lasting and profound effect on Northern Ireland'
Louis Malby KC for the prosecution said the events of Bloody Sunday had had a "long-lasting and profound effect on Northern Ireland".
He said of the four men wounded, three were still alive and were prepared to give evidence.
Mr Malby said the events of Bloody Sunday were well known and did not require retelling.
But the charges, he said, related to a particular part of that day and a burst of gunfire in Glenfada Park North which left Mr Wray and Mr McKinney dead, and four others injured.
He said Soldier F and several colleagues had entered the courtyard and a group of people there had begun to run away.
As they did so they were fired on.
The shooting Mr Malby said had been "unnecessary, gratuitous and was carried out with an intent to kill or at the very least with an intent to cause very serious harm".
The soldiers could not have believed that the people they were firing on posed any threat.
He said the soldiers had then "falsely claimed" that the civilians they'd shot had been armed with nail bombs and small rifles.
"That was an attempt to justify and to confuse, but it was demonstrably false."
He said those military statements placed the defendant, Soldier F, at the scene and stated that he'd fired his weapon.
Mr Malby said the admissibility of those military statements would be tested at a hearing later in the week.
A public inquiry established by the UK government, and which reported in 2010, said none of those shot had posed a threat.
The Saville Inquiry said that the soldiers had opened fire following a loss of discipline.
Its findings were also critical of a commanding officer.
The then British Prime Minister David Cameron apologised for the conduct of the soldiers in the House of Commons.
A police inquiry followed and in 2019 Northern Ireland's Public Prosecution Service (PPS) announced that Solider F would face charges.
He was the only one of 17 former soldiers reported for potential prosecution where the PPS decided to proceed.
The case against Soldier F was later discontinued by the PPS on legal grounds but reinstated after the families took a successful court challenge.
Relatives of the Bloody Sunday dead have walked a short distance to the court for the start of the trial at Belfast Crown Court.
Supporters of Soldier F are also likely to be in attendance.
In a statement issued on behalf of the Bloody Sunday Trust, its chairperson Tony Doherty, whose father was shot dead, said they hoped for justice.
"We have waited fifty three long years…and hopefully we will see a measure of it through this trial," he said.
He said the families had campaigned for an acknowledgement of the innocence of the victims; the repudiation of results of an earlier inquiry which exonerated the soldiers and prosecutions of those involved.
Two of the three objectives had already been achieved, he said.
"This day will be a tribute to the strength of the Bloody Sunday families whose indefatigable campaign for justice has made this happen."
by vague_intentionally_
13 comments
Cant wait to hear what his defence is
Well its about fucking time
What a disgrace that it has taken 53 years for this man to see a court, especially as it has always been known who these soldiers are.
Not like it took 53 years to hunt him down.
Justice for the people of Northern Ireland.
He doesn’t deserve any sort of protection. He’s basically a serial killer that got paid by the government. He should be treated no better than the likes of Fred West or Ted Bundy and given just as harsh a sentence as they were.
Now let’s see how this new found weekend protesters brotherhood of “🇮🇪🏴” holds strong with this topic.
[removed]
I don’t really hold out any hope that they’ll get a conviction. Protecting a mass murderer for fifty three years, over half a fucking century, and still protecting his anonymity shows the fanatical level of protection Britain gives to its murderers.
The average age of the men shot on Bloody Sunday was 26. The average life expectancy for a man in Northern Ireland is 78.8 years. They’ve delayed this to the point where statistically any survivor should’ve died of old age. Some fucking justice. What a great state. Must make them proud.
He is guilty. That’s been established. 53 years to see a court when the government who sent him to Derry had knowledge of the killings prior to them taking place. Premeditated murder lets be clear on that. The Queen knew it when she awarded the paras medals for “Gallantry”. David james cleary is guilty but not alone. He has been protected for 53 years and more to the point he’s the one being thrown to the lions.
https://preview.redd.it/u49zfer6ebpf1.jpeg?width=976&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9bc309668a51349026007d3aa32d94c0809e00cb
MUDERED BY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
[removed]
I’ve read a lot of material on this and there isn’t a single coherent or logical argument a person can make for supporting this man, or the paras in general for that matter
If you put up a parachute regiment flag you’re simply saying “I hate taigs and I think it’s great when they’re murdered”
Just a naked declaration of supremacism – less a dog whistle and more like a string of sausages dangling out of a bag like you’d see in the Beano
I fear that nothing will happen him. The british army/UK government will not allow him to be found guilty of anything, because if they do it will open too many floodgates, provide validity to too many accusations of injustice.
I hope they’ll finally see him and his actions for what they are, but he’s had a long life of freedom already, the disgusting rat bastard.
Genuine question – not doubting what the happened here was horrific and a crime. But why are they prosecuting now, when there was an amnesty for other parties to the troubles? Plenty of other horrific acts have been forgiven or forgotten. Plenty of killers released. How is this different?
I wish him the worst
Comments are closed.