‘Dangerous’ West London teenager committed ‘abhorrent’ sex attacks on London Underground

by OneNormalBloke

10 comments
  1. 4 counts of sexual assault by the age of 18 and he gets 4 years.

    Sexual crimes should carry a 10 year minimum sentence with no deduction in time based on behaviour.

    Absolutely no reason to believe multi-occasion sex offenders can be integrated into society after under half a decade.

  2. This is why reporting creepy behaviour on the tube is a must!

  3. As opposed to those sex attacks we don’t find ‘abhorrent’? The use of quotation marks would indicate that ‘abhorrent’ could be a matter of opinion in this case, which suggests quite strongly to me that the headline writer might be a nonce.They should make people learn English language before they write these news pieces.

  4. I need somebody to research the connection between scraggly facial hair and being an asshole, because I feel like I see this moustache a LOT in mugshots

    (it’s probably baader meinhof syndrome or confirmation bias or something LOL)

  5. I’d criticise him but then the Labour voters would say I’m racist

Comments are closed.