Legervakbond stelt minister van Defensie Francken (N-VA) in gebreke: “Je kan niet alles afnemen, maar niks in de plaats geven” | VRT NWS: nieuws

by atrocious_cleva82

3 comments

  1. >”In the past, there was a moral contract: soldiers loyally performed their hours, even though they were paid barely 12.5 hours for a 24-hour shift. On the other hand, soldiers were allowed to retire at the age of 56 at the end of their careers because of these demanding performances.”

    >”During their career, a soldier works an average of about seven years for free, due to all the uncompensated hours they put in,” he continues. “Between 56 and 63, those seven years of free work are complete. If we’re no longer allowed to retire at 56, why should we continue working for free?”

    >”Now the moral contract is being broken. Then a soldier must also be paid or compensated for every hour they work. You can’t take everything away, but give nothing in return,” he says. “It’s time the government took the security of our country seriously and compensated its soldiers accordingly.” The union is demanding payment for all hours worked retroactively over a period of 10 years.

  2. Beke kort de bocht want is nu niet dat ie alles afgenome heeft e ma swat, framing is the name natuurlijk bij vakbonden en de media.

  3. Mijn vraag hierbij is, als je 24u werkt, maar je krijgt er maar 12,6u van betaald hoe overleef je dan?
    Stel je werkt 40 u per week, dan wordt je er in essentie volgens de vakbonden maar 21u betaald?
    Moest dit zo rechtlijnig zijn 1 op 1, dan verdien je toch serieus onder het minimumloon?
    Gezien u loon in essentie gehalveerd wordt..
    En de militairen vinden dit blijkbaar ok, omdat ze vroeg op pensioen mogen?

    Ik heb het gevoel dat er hier ergens iets wordt verzwegen nee?

Comments are closed.