On October 3rd, 1992, Sinead O’Connor tears up a picture of Pope John Paul II on Saturday Night Live in protest of sex abuse in the Catholic Church.



by Gamebyter

31 comments

  1. And she was right since it has been proven that he knew about it and even actively helped to cover up for fellow priests by moving them to different parishes

  4. She was very troubled person. Catholics and Muslims both used and abused her. Very sad story worth to check out even on wiki.

  7. Brave woman. Slightly beside the point, I once spoke to a few Irish Catholics (or people with Catholic background rather) and from what I understood the CC’s interference in the daily life of individual families was off the charts, probably that’s why Ireland went in the opposite direction, thankfully.

  12. Considering she was a bipolar nutjob who later converted to Islam, any criticisms of religious figures coming from her are nothing but laughable. She was a hypocrite.

  17. Let me guess – media outlets went on a smear campaign against her and the public gleefully ate that shit up.

  21. child molesters should be burned out with hot iron with no hesitation

    on the other hand later she turned towards Islam that was started by pedophile Muhammad – he married Aisha when she was 6 and mounted on her when she was 8 years old

    it turns this picture tearing action into a performance meant to get attention

  23. We should done the same with german flags in Poland😊

  24. And then she converted to Islam and pedophilia stopped bothering her.

  27. She was a joke. Lost her shit when nobody cared for her anymore and converted to islam.

  28. And 26 years later she publicly embraced p*dophilia when she converted to islam xD

  29. Did she do the same with the abuses of school teachers? Because per capita… they are waaay worst than priests.

  30. As a result, she became a victim of cancel culture and no Free Speech Warriors stood up for her.

Comments are closed.