“To the people who lose it, it’s a big loss. There are so many houses they could have chosen, why choose one where the public has to lose such a big chunk of the park for their private benefit,” said Tina, who declined to give her surname. “I am very upset.”
She added: “I do think it’s outrageous, the way it was done. I think it’s a selfish act.”
There is a lot of deference to the royal family in these parts. Some, indeed, believed the royal family owned the Great Park, Tina said. Today about half of the land is private and half publicly accessible.
Posted by ButIDigress79
9 comments
How many palaces do the Wales’ need?
Selfish, selfish, selfish.
He can do all the scooter rides and interviews he wants, but Williams actions scream louder than his words.
60 hectares seems a bit much.
There’s a lot of confusion from Tina about publicly accessible and privately owned land here.
They have Anmer Hall, KP and now this?
They’re forever home until their next forever home, but screw the plebs whichever way.
F-e-n-t-o-n.
As well they should. It’s going to cost a fortune and they have multiple other homes.
So this is why we got the rare and “raw” interview from William the other day. To get ahead of any backlash.
Comments are closed.