Why is the UK press so quiet on Nathan Gill/Nigel Farage and The Kremlin?

22 comments

1. Yes, why are they.

2. Interesting read, but it’s been suspected for a long time that Farage is on Putins payroll

3. What annoys me about this is that actually, this is a well covered story. However, about once a week I’ll run into a Reform supporter on reddit and I’ll bring it up. They will then do the whole “this isn’t true, of it is share the links” as they expect you to spoon feed them something that had been well covered in multiple news stories.

4. I’ve said for years comrade Nigel is bought and paid for, way back when he was with UKIP in the EU parliament. I can’t prove it, but you only need to connect the dots with him and the mango Mussolini over the pond.

5. I mean, Farage voted as an MEP against tackling Russian funded propaganda!

6. Because weve heard this smear before with trump and know it is bullshit just like the source of this article

7. > cites Byline Times

   😂😂😂

8. Look who owns the press.

9. Dodgy money don’t just buy dodgy politicians. This is corruption with an agenda to quietly fuck up the UK. Suspect anything that is right wing. They’d lap up any chance of envelopes of cash, it’s the tory way. You know the dodgy corrupt bunch of economic incompetents that crashed our economy before being kicked out (who were also discovered to be taking russian money), and their donors, i.e. the right wing gutter press. Next gen torys are STILL TORYS.

   Putin is their puppet master.

10. Because that are set to make billions in tax rebates and cuts when there man Farage gets in

11. Nathan Gill pleaded guilty in a court of law and accepted full responsibility. He wasn’t even the leader of Reform UK Wales when he accepted the bribes.

    That story isn’t really anything to do with Farage or Reform. Farage/Reform can’t be held accountable for dodgy dealings behind closed doors.

12. Because it would bring down too many big names across banking, law, the intelligence service and the NCA.

13. Because for all the bluster of impartial it’s not impartial. Also if won’t help stop reform. Reform could be bumming their supporters physically and the supporter would deny it happening or blame starmer some how

14. Telegraph, Daily Mail, Daily Express, and even the BBC have a pro-Reform bias. They’re only interested in negative press against the government.

15. If I try to keep my impartiality hat on, there are definitely curious connections here, but nothing concrete. It’s the same as Farage’s teachers writing letters when he was 17 stating that he was racist/fascist, there’s a chance he might have changed since I suppose.

    Where I struggle with that impartiality is, regardless of how much I could possibly believe it’s not true, the chances of those things being true is definitely greater than zero. There is no way I could vote to elect someone to PM if there was even a remote chance these things were true.

16. Because it’s Farage and our media is mostly right wing. So they’ll brush over it.

17. We all know why. The same reason they never mention Brexit, when for 10 years they discussed it incessantly.

18. We may have a Labour government, but this country is run by the right wing.

19. Zia Yousuf saying nobody had heard of him?

    [Here’s the rat-faced traitor ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBMvZRf9Scs)sitting just behind Farage during his final speech to the EU parliament.

    The article mentions Isabel Oakeshott, but unless I missed it, the author of this article makes no mention tha she is Richard Tice’s wife?

20. Of all the arguments against reform, this should be at the very fucking tippy top.

21. All far right wing movements in the west are sponsored by Russia

22. Not so keen on jumping out of windows, probably.

Comments are closed.