Potential Tomahawk targets in Russia.

If the U.S. sends Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, nearly 2,000 Russian military sites — including 76 airbases — could fall within range.

Source: ISW

by BigDeckBob

26 comments

  1. woo, they could actually demilitarise and denazify a lot of ru with that kind of range, it would keep the nazi population pretty well under control.

  3. I just wished taco would have quietly (impossible with that tard) sent them and we had seen an early NYE across russia.

  5. This is becoming like the Leopard tanks jerk-a-thon. If and when it happens, then we can salivate over the details.

  6. This is the biggest nothing burger, in a long series of nothing burgers being reported on. Write about aid actually being sent to Ukraine…

  7. You really think Trump, i.e. Krasnov, would ever provide them to Ukraine?
    The pedophile criminal, that idolizes Putin?

    Forget it…
    At this point, Trump has every motivation to keep this war going forever: endless weapon sales, all paid by the EU!

    And Trumps master, Putin, will not allow the war to end, because if the army, the people Putin fucked over so greatly, returns home, Putin would be done: he will not allow it.

  9. I hope Ukraine gets enough Tomahawks to destroy them all.

  10. Can’t see it happening.

    Ukraine do your own thing regarding the long range gear

  11. So you are saying they need at least 6000 tomahawks 😀

  12. Due to the popularity of this sub, I do not surmise this is a good place to discuss or propagate strategy. These are things that affect Ukraines ability to be discreet and impactful.

  13. They won’t. It’s pointless to discuss theoretical outcomes that are less likely than a miracle.

  14. Don’t get your hopes up high folks.
    I think 2 weeks, and then rinse and repeat is way more likely scenario.

  16. Let’s not even talk about it until that f*ckwit in the White House actually does it.

  18. Are the iranian Shahed-factories in their range?

  20. Instead of Tomahawks, machines to help and refine the Flamingo would be more helpful.

    The US doesn’t have a lot of Tomahawks launchers on land and Ukraine doesn’t have ships that could.

    A refined version of the Flamingo that is quicker in set-up or perhaps vehicle launched would serve Ukraine a lot more.

    That is even before having to take Too Weak TACO into account.

  21. Nobody believes that Agent Orange will actually send anything. Trump is the most corrupt USA president ever!

  23. So let’s send them 2,500 and let them surprise us with some ”bonus” strikes

  24. This will never happen. Just a scare-tactic?
    Ukraine has no capability to fire Tomahawks.

    They need to talk about JASSMs. The US has thousands of them.
    300+km range
    500kg warhead
    Can be fired from an F16.
    Cost is less than a million.
    JASSMs has never been sold to Ukraine. These could be sent and fired within weeks.

  26. Regarding potential targets, I’ve been wondering of the local police stations, in actuality being state or national police stations staffed with presidential appointees, would those buildings be considered civilian or military targets?

Comments are closed.