WANA (Oct 26) – In the early hours of Saturday, October 18, the central prison of Qom, Iran, witnessed the execution of a maexecution of a man whose story quickly split into two radically opposing narratives.
In the official Iranian account, he was a Mossad spy executed for collaborating with Israel’s intelligence services. But in the headlines of opposition outlets and anti-Iranian networks, he was portrayed as a “nuclear expert” who lost his life “for his intellectual ties with the West.”
This contrast is not merely about one individual—it reflects a deeper battle that today unfolds less in physical arenas and more in the realm of perception and narrative.
Iran Executes Spy Convicted of Collaborating with Mossad in Qom
WANA (Oct 19) – The Judiciary Chief of Qom Province announced that the death sentence of a spy convicted of “enmity against God (moharebeh)” and “corruption on earth (efsad fel-arz)” was carried out in Qom Prison following confirmation by the Supreme Court and the rejection of the defendant’s request for clemency. According to the […]
According to Iran’s Judiciary and the Qom Justice Department, Javad Naeimi, born in 1978 in Abadan, had no technical or professional background in nuclear science. He held a master’s degree in Executive Management and worked as a social researcher and service-sector entrepreneur, primarily active in tourism and residence services in Turkey—not in Natanz’s nuclear facilities.
However, Iranian authorities state that in October 2023, Naeimi established contact with a Mossad officer and, after several months of information exchange, was arrested in February 2024. His death sentence was issued under Article 6 of Iran’s Law on Combating Hostile Actions of the Zionist Regime of Israel and was upheld by the Supreme Court before being carried out.
Meanwhile, opposition channel Iran International ran the headline: “A Nuclear Expert Executed in Qom.” Shortly afterward, Siamak Tadayyon Tahmasebi, a media activist accused himself of collaborating with Mossad against Iran, circulated an obituary claiming Naeimi had worked at the Natanz nuclear site.
Opposition channel Iran International ran the headline: “A Nuclear Expert Executed in Qom.”. Social media / WANA News
What initially appeared as a human-interest story was, in fact, part of a broader information operation: a reflection of the ongoing narrative war that seeks not to defend an individual, but to undermine the credibility of Iran’s security apparatus.
In recent years, a new pattern has emerged in the intelligence confrontation between Iran and Israel—one that is no longer limited to obtaining military or nuclear data, but revolves around shaping the public perception of truth.
Israel increasingly portrays captured agents as “civil activists” or “scientific experts” to put Iran’s security agencies on the defensive.
In response, Tehran has adopted a strategy of releasing detailed biographical and legal data on the defendants—education, motives, and personal records—to restore public trust in its judiciary and intelligence institutions.
Israel Recruited Executed Spy Through Google Ads
WANA (Aug 20) – An informed source has disclosed that some of the spies arrested in Iran following the Israeli regime’s recent incursion were recruited through Google Ads campaigns. According to the source, advertisements designed to attract spies, displayed within various applications, were delivered via the Google Ads service, with Israel directly involved in […]
From this perspective, the Javad Naeimi case is not merely an intelligence-related execution; it is part of Iran’s broader strategy to showcase its intelligence power—a direct message to Mossad and its allies that infiltration into Iran’s social and institutional depth is not only difficult but costly.
The global reaction on social media demonstrated that this case transcended Iran’s domestic boundaries. Many non-Iranian users supported the execution, using phrases such as “Well done, Iran,” “A real hero,” “He deserved it,” and “Find and punish all spies.”
It is worth noting that in many legal systems—including that of the United States—espionage and treason are among the gravest crimes, often carrying severe penalties.
Hence, international support for the “maximum punishment” of infiltrators is not an emerging moral stance, but rather a media phenomenon amplified and accelerated in today’s networked world.
Javad Naeimi, Mossad spy executed in Iran for collaborating with Israel’s intelligence services. Social media / WANA News Agency
The Naeimi case carried three simultaneous messages to domestic, regional, and international actors:
1. Domestic message: “Iran’s intelligence agencies can detect and neutralize infiltration”—a vital assertion for restoring public confidence after years of alleged breaches and assassinations.
2. Message to Mossad and allies: “Penetration into Iran’s social fabric comes at a price”—the execution itself serves as a core element of Iran’s deterrence architecture.
3. Cognitive message: By disclosing details of the case while simultaneously confronting opposition media, Tehran signaled that it can be proactive, not merely reactive, in the information war.
Ultimately, the story of Javad Naeimi is not just a judicial case—it is a strategic communiqué in the ongoing Iran–Israel confrontation:
on one side, a demonstration of intelligence dominance; on the other, a mirror reflecting how, in the age of social media, narratives can become weapons more precise than missiles.
Arrest of 700 Israeli Operatives in Iran Over 12 Days
WANA (Jun 25) – Over 700 individuals affiliated with the Israeli regime have been arrested by Iranian security forces over the past 12 days. Following Israel’s attack on Iran, the Israeli regime’s espionage network became highly active across the country. Iranian intelligence and security forces managed to identify and arrest more than 700 operatives […]