
Teens jailed for zombie knife killing of aspring drill rapper Mikey Roynon walk free after manslaughter convictions quashed
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15242891/Teens-jailed-zombie-knife-killing-aspring-drill-rapper-Mikey-Roynon-walk-free-manslaughter-convictions-quashed.html
Posted by dailymail
9 comments
Can we stop calling them “zombie knifes” want people to take knife crime seriously while using very unserious terminology.. Grow up, it’s a knife, a blade… Fucking donkey ass country I swear
Drill is nothing to be aspiring over
Wow.
So the zombie knife ban was bollocks then.. I’m surprised.
Why can’t we just flush these turds?
>She said: ‘The directions directed the jury that they could convict Cartel, and Leo, if they were sure that Cartel and Leo may not have acted defensively. This was not the case.
>’The jury could only properly convict Cartel and Leo if they were sure that Cartel, or Leo, was not acting in self-defence.’
Other than the ‘or’ I fail to see the material difference in these two statements. They were still both found to not be acting defensively, or in self-defense, and we’re convicted. How exactly does the phrasing “acting defensively” vs “acting in self-defense” as well as “Cartel and Leo” vs “Cartel, or Leo” create a material difference in the directions such that the conviction were squashed…
> She said: ‘The directions directed the jury that they could convict Cartel, and Leo, if they were sure that Cartel and Leo may not have acted defensively. This was not the case.
> The jury could only properly convict Cartel and Leo if they were sure that Cartel, or Leo, was not acting in self-defence.’
TLDR – judge said “may not have” rather than that they were certain. So judge wrongly said “if you’re mostly sure” rather than “completely sure”
I can see why this was overturned in that case. How unfortunate
Breaking news, drill rapper thug who lived by the sword dies by it.
Aspiring rapper. Lol.
Comments are closed.