Royally Ghosted: How the Palace Silences Its Own

Posted by duckduck_flamingo

4 comments
  1. I understand this writer is trying to say the RF cuts off anyone who embarrasses them. But suggesting Harry may suffer a similar fate to Andrew for moving across the world and telling some family secrets is really low.

    “The signals are already visible. He [Harry] will be omitted from future working rosters. He may attend fewer state events—if he is invited at all.”

    Harry has already been omitted from working rosters. When was he last invited to a state event?

    I guess I’m just tired of the “Harry’s next” conversation when Harry hasn’t done anything even remotely bad as Andrew.

  2. I have no dog in the RF infighting, but I think removing Harry’s titles would be viewed as petty and spiteful. Yes Harry’s said and wrote some stuff, and you are feel to feel anyway you wish about that, but Harry’s hasn’t done anything his father hasn’t done. Just like Harry, Charles said not so nice things about his family. Did he loose his family’s love, or his titles? I think the best thing William can do is let sleeping dogs lie. Let Harry’s do his thing unmolested. And Harry let William do this thing without further comment. Edited typos

  3. Things I didn’t have on my Bingo card:
    – Some members of the press making Andrew a victim for deservedly losing his titles
    – Some of Harry’s fans publicly siding with Andrew because they fear for Harry’s title

Comments are closed.