“Pro Palestine activists” doing a lot of heavy lifting for “constituents objecting to genocide”
Given this outcome serious questions should be asked about the position of the MP involved in this.
They won’t be of course, but they should be.
Fantastic. These two young people did not deserve to have their lives ruined from a malevolent MP, Alex Davies-Jones, who used her power and influence to maliciously pursue them.
It was the general election campaign period – where robust debate is expected. They were in a public setting – and **the MP approached them.** Anyone who has watched the video can tell who was in the wrong – and it wasn’t these two brave anti-genocide campaigners.
As a rule of thumb, the person in favour of arming an ethnosupremacist terror state to rape, burn alive, and mass murder an entire population – is usually in the wrong.
good, they were ridiculous convictions
MP s complaining about being held to account for supporting genocide. Sickening.
Read the damn article before going off on a rant about the MP. The judge didn’t find that the MP wasn’t harassed. They only believed alternative measures should have been attempted prior to prosecution.
“Judge Lloyd-Clarke said the actions of the appellants amounted to a “planned and well-orchestrated campaign” intended to harm the electoral prospects of Ms Davies-Jones.
However, she noted that “less intrusive” measures such as a police warning or civil action were not pursued prior to prosecution.
“Nothing in this judgment implies, or should be taken to imply, that there is any truth in the accusations made by the appellants about Ms Davies-Jones.”
6 comments
“Pro Palestine activists” doing a lot of heavy lifting for “constituents objecting to genocide”
Given this outcome serious questions should be asked about the position of the MP involved in this.
They won’t be of course, but they should be.
Fantastic. These two young people did not deserve to have their lives ruined from a malevolent MP, Alex Davies-Jones, who used her power and influence to maliciously pursue them.
It was the general election campaign period – where robust debate is expected. They were in a public setting – and **the MP approached them.** Anyone who has watched the video can tell who was in the wrong – and it wasn’t these two brave anti-genocide campaigners.
As a rule of thumb, the person in favour of arming an ethnosupremacist terror state to rape, burn alive, and mass murder an entire population – is usually in the wrong.
good, they were ridiculous convictions
MP s complaining about being held to account for supporting genocide. Sickening.
Read the damn article before going off on a rant about the MP. The judge didn’t find that the MP wasn’t harassed. They only believed alternative measures should have been attempted prior to prosecution.
“Judge Lloyd-Clarke said the actions of the appellants amounted to a “planned and well-orchestrated campaign” intended to harm the electoral prospects of Ms Davies-Jones.
However, she noted that “less intrusive” measures such as a police warning or civil action were not pursued prior to prosecution.
“Nothing in this judgment implies, or should be taken to imply, that there is any truth in the accusations made by the appellants about Ms Davies-Jones.”
Comments are closed.