Leicester University ‘does not condone’ staff member egging Thatcher statue

25 comments
  1. “The University of Leicester has a longstanding history of supporting art, fostering creativity and protecting creative freedom.”

    Surely throwing eggs could be argued as being a form of artistic freedom.

  2. I thought we were removing statues of embarrassing parts of our history not adding more. I hope that it is defaced on a daily basis like it deserves.

  3. Neither Leicester University nor any other institution is in a place to express their lack of condonation of freedom of speech. It’s none of their bloody business

  4. >I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left.

    Honestly, I can think of no better tribute to Thatcher than this. If you have to resort to public defecation or vandalism to make your point, then it means your point is worthless.

  5. I do think the liberal interpretation of “damage” in criminal damage needs to change.

    It isn’t a good use of CPS, court, or police time prosecuting somebody for egging a statue. I think it’s a waste if valuable resources and a waste of taxpayer money. I’d say the same if it was a statute of a lefty leader being egged. The rain will wash it off for goodness sake.

  6. Instead of egging her, how about sitting down in the park (or whatever it is) close to it, and looping “Ding dong, the witch is dead” on the ghettoblaster?

  7. I support it. As much as I support Thatcher doing what she believed in and what she thought was best for the country, it caused pain for the majority, and an egg is just deserves.

  8. I really truly look forward to this thing being decorated repeatedly with a traffic cone to the head like the one in Scotland.
    In the fullness of time, the council will run out of funds to remove the cone as has happened in Scotland and it will become a permanent feature.
    Indeed, if by a miracle, a labour council were to be elected they could find the funds for the cone to be permanently attached.

  9. What interests me is that people are very chill about vandalising a statue of (say) Thatcher based on sincere political beliefs, but if someone were to do the same to a statue of (say) Mandela or de Valera for the same reason, they’d be labelled a monster.

  10. Two bloody cctvs watch over the statue with the threats of defacement.

    A statue has 2 cameras to keep it it safe.

    Someone has got their priorities in a twist there.

Leave a Reply