I’m starving

by Signal-Tangerine1597

28 comments
  1. Your daily dose of government propaganda people. đŸ€Ł

  2. I think it is valid to call for more public funding to be spent on the citizens of a country over foreign aid policies as there is an imbalance. At the same time, those who can afford it have a duty to help those who need it.

    In the uk, we pay taxes with the expectation that it will go into public funds such as health care or social benefits. There are legitimate reasons to be on both side of the argument, and frankly, calling people stupid or ridiculous just because they dont agree with you will cause more of a devide. We as a nation need to stand together. Policies are written badly, politicians lie, and that’s what causes a lot of strife

  3. I mean if they technically cut all aid funding, dropped the cost of immigrants and didn’t give anyone who wasn’t British born benefits they would suddenly have around 35-40 billion pounds, if they claimed they couldn’t feed everyone with that then you’d know they’re a bunch of lying cunts.

  4. Funny how take care of our own ends the second someone actually needs help.

  5. This could be used for liberals as well to be honest.

    Notice how they’re all for migration so long as none of the migrants are housed near them? Didn’t the deputy Green leader campaign AGAINST migrants being housed in her local area?

  6. The guy needs to look more like Nigel Farage, then i’ll be happy.

  7. See, when they say “our own” they mean millionaires and fellow politicians.

  8. ”im dying of cancer“ okay pay us £100k+ for treatment so we can be like America

  9. I think this isn’t as crazy as it sounds – to steel man the argument it could be something like this


    “We need to cut compassionate spending, both for our own citizens and anyone else’s”

  10. In the Netherlands we just had a “march for a safer country”.
    36 people ended up getting arrested for violent behaviour or carrying weapons.

  11. >>assumes the money actually going to the parents, who were clearly very responsible and cared a lot about their kids in the first place, is going to stop that. lol.

  12. Leftist NPC: “Refugees are welcome! 😏”

    Me: “Okay so you’ll take one in your house?”

    Leftist NPC: “Err I don’t have room”

    Me: “Karen you live alone in 3 bedroom house in a 98% white affluent neighbourhood. So what you are saying is that some working class village can get ruined with dangerous unvetted men who will follow their daughters home from school, just so you can virtue signal to your liberal elite friends?”

  13. So if I have 10 kids to take care off and all of them move out , I still am in the same financial position? This meme has no logic and I’m sure it’s intentional to make the left look bad.

  14. How long before I get to repost this? Is there a queue or is it every man for himself?

  15. Deflecting hostility onto a strawman is a tactic that’s probably older than written language. Honestly sometimes it feels like it’s our fault for still falling for it.

    Quite obviously, like any politician does, they’re just sticking their mug into the trough as deep as they can while trying to distract you with today’s “whataboutism”.

  16. My mummy is against antiimagration but she is just upset because many/most people don’t get background checks so many criminals also get in. She doesn’t think that all immigrants are, but we still need to make sure when people come into our country

  17. “We need to get rid of immigrants they 🍇 children and ruin society” (completely untrue)
    “Okay can you make our society more developed and affordable and provide free school meals and a better education?”
    “the government’s job isn’t to take care of you.”

  18. Yeah, don’t forget, before it was small boats crossing the channel that were to blame for all of our problems, these idiots were against the government providing breakfasts to impoverished, *British* school children. They’ll be the same people who claim Britain is a Christian nation 🙄

  19. Coming to you from across the pond—- the new hot take is going to be that “nobody is starving.” They’ll fall over themselves to demand that you find a *real* example of a starving or malnourished child that isn’t the result of parents making bad choices. Which is utter and complete nonsense, and should be treated as such— even if a child is born to terrible parents, they shouldn’t be starved because of it, that’s absurdist. I assume most of your folks who need food assistance are also employed full time and *also* struggling to make ends meet. 

    Anyway, be prepared for their attempts to move the goal posts, and don’t let them do so. 

Comments are closed.