Turns out ‘no conflicts of interest’ includes Bitcoin.

Posted by Significant-Sir-4343

12 comments
  1. The bigger conflict being his financial profiteering off vaccine lawsuits. He signed over the kickback to his son. 

  2. Crypto needs to be nuked from the orbit.

    There is absolutely no reason for crypto to exist other than corruption, bribery, money laundering, drug dealing, and otherwise subverting the law, as well as blowing up a bubble to scam impressionable young men who want to get rich quick.

    And also fuck the tech bros.

    Edit: Holy crap the crypto bros in this thread. Crypto is a scam no matter how much you want to polish this turd. Some of you might have been lucky to make a profit – if that’s you, then congrats on your winning bet, but it’s just that – a bet.

    At least tulip bulbs are nice to look at.

  3. Playing devils advocate here, how is owning Bitcoin a conflict of interest for the HHS Secretary? Is there something he could do in his capacity as HHS Secretary to manipulate the price of Bitcoin? Would owning some other non-equity asset (e.g. gold) also be a conflict of interest?

    Owning shares in a pharma company is unquestionably a conflict of interest for him. Bitcoin? I’m not understanding the objection.

  4. so i hate RFK Jr. and think heis incredibly dangerous – but whats the conflict with his position and bitcoin? is he involved in crypto policy in any way?

  5. Since he benefits from doubt cast by his apparent ignorance and stupidity, he will pretend to not know crypto is a conflict of interest.

Comments are closed.