Sure, it’s in no way because we sent a decent act this time…
This article thinks it’s because we sent weapons to Ukraine. Do you really think the judges considered that? No, it’s more likely our result was because our entry didn’t fucking suck and that’s probably because the BBC completely overhauled the selection process and production team this year.
Yeah, Europe is enjoying our misery!
So what did the two zero pointers in the other previous post-brexit Eurovisions show, that we *were* a ‘social pariah and not very popular’ but now they have forgiven us?
I think it’s a mistake to draw any meaningful conclusions from the Eurovision result.
it showed that Sam Ryder makes music that Europe enjoys better than say….. Engelbert Humperdinck
Moldova still had the best song.
I see GBeebies still has its finger of the pulse of Europe politics.
Lmao how can you draw that conclusion with a straight face? Europe actually takes eurovision seriously, us treating it like a joke pissed them off.
Britain does poorly in the Eurovision: it’s all political, see Europe hates us and we deserve it.
Britain does OK: totally not political, it’s because we actually tried this time. There’s no reason why Europe would view us positively in a political way. None whatsoever.
When I was watching the results come in my thoughts were on people like this, claiming it meant brexit was a success.
No it was a classic Eurovision song following the quiet, loud, quiet formula which usually yields good results.
Some people liked a song. That’s all the proof we need that Brexit was a success. I will be taking no further questions at this time.
France and Germany come last all the time and the centre point of EU anyway. The reason we did shite for ages was we were shite for ages. The judges only care about a good song and the public in Europe broadly do as well.
14 comments
clutching at straws
Sure, it’s in no way because we sent a decent act this time…
This article thinks it’s because we sent weapons to Ukraine. Do you really think the judges considered that? No, it’s more likely our result was because our entry didn’t fucking suck and that’s probably because the BBC completely overhauled the selection process and production team this year.
Yeah, Europe is enjoying our misery!
So what did the two zero pointers in the other previous post-brexit Eurovisions show, that we *were* a ‘social pariah and not very popular’ but now they have forgiven us?
I think it’s a mistake to draw any meaningful conclusions from the Eurovision result.
it showed that Sam Ryder makes music that Europe enjoys better than say….. Engelbert Humperdinck
Moldova still had the best song.
I see GBeebies still has its finger of the pulse of Europe politics.
Lmao how can you draw that conclusion with a straight face? Europe actually takes eurovision seriously, us treating it like a joke pissed them off.
Britain does poorly in the Eurovision: it’s all political, see Europe hates us and we deserve it.
Britain does OK: totally not political, it’s because we actually tried this time. There’s no reason why Europe would view us positively in a political way. None whatsoever.
When I was watching the results come in my thoughts were on people like this, claiming it meant brexit was a success.
No it was a classic Eurovision song following the quiet, loud, quiet formula which usually yields good results.
Some people liked a song. That’s all the proof we need that Brexit was a success. I will be taking no further questions at this time.
France and Germany come last all the time and the centre point of EU anyway. The reason we did shite for ages was we were shite for ages. The judges only care about a good song and the public in Europe broadly do as well.