Older couple running

Older couple running

Much of retirement planning is focused on the so-called “magic number” — how much you need to have saved in order to live comfortably and confidently without employment income.

Today, most Canadians believe that magic number is $1.54 million, according to a 2025 Bank of Montreal survey (1).

But the complexity of your golden years go way beyond a single number. This number tells you nothing about how your personal finances compare to your peers and whether you’re likely to feel comfortable and confident in retirement.

Even if you don’t have a $1.54-million nest egg, here are seven signs you’re doing better than most retirees and can afford to relax.

While you can’t anticipate all your monthly expenses, you will need at least enough guaranteed retirement income — including pensions, personal savings, Old Age Security (OAS) and the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) — to pay for food, shelter and utilities.

As of 2023, Statistics Canada found that couples over the age of 65 spend an average of $78,499 per year, which breaks down to about $6,541 per month (2).

So if your guaranteed retirement income delivers over $6,500 a month at least, you’re outperforming most other retirees.

Unfortunately, carrying high-interest consumer debt into retirement is becoming more common. According to StatCan, 37% of senior families have consumer debt as of 2016 — the most recent data on hand (3).

Managing consumer debt is tough on a limited fixed income. A sudden spike in interest rates could derail your retirement plan.

Meanwhile, mortgage debt continues to put a strain on the finances of older adults as well. A 2025 survey from Royal LePage found that 29% of people planning to retire in 2025 or 2026 say they will continue to have a mortgage on their primary residence in retirement (4).

Read more: Here are 5 expenses that Canadians (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?

Many older Canadians are forced to rely on CPP/OAS as their sole source of income. Data from 2015 shows that the OAS program reduced the percentage of seniors below Statistics Canada’s Low Income Cut-Off (LICO) to just 4%. Without the program, the rate would have been 23% (5).

Story Continues