(Obligatory fuck CDU. They’re the reason we’re in this mess in the first place)
By raising the prices so the number of travelers goes down?
(Fuck the guy / girl that decided to raise the price of D-Ticket)
The article is a bit superficial: there’s very little about what is being done to fix the problems. Off the top of my head, some of the measures being proposed or implemented include:
* a general overhaul of nearly all of the most important long-distance lines
* simplifying the process of securing funding for critical projects
* reducing red tape to lessen the risk of projects taking decades just to get greenlit
* recruitment drives
* cutting out a large chunk of middle management to streamline decision-making processes
* creating a “common welfare oriented” company to handle the infrastructure, meaning that any profit it makes must be re-invested into the infrastructure
* reforming the way contractors are handled so they cooperate better on a project, instead of each having a separate contract
There’s a lot more stuff, but I’m cautiously optimistic. I think the government has now got the message that a robust and reliable rail infrastructure is as crucial to the economy as a good road infrastructure is. The appointment of Evelyn Palla is a good sign: she has a good reputation, and so far the support of the train drivers’ union.
When I lived in Switzerland they used to apologize if the train was more than 2 minutes late.
The NIMBY-ism is too strong. The love of red tape too great.
I think there’s just no accountability/ethic to serve the community so even if there is a fix it will be extremely slow and probably bad. At this point it’s the mentality
Delay is ok but they just canceled all trains from Bonn to Cologne today after 15:00 wtf, there were hundred people at the station
7 comments
(Obligatory fuck CDU. They’re the reason we’re in this mess in the first place)
By raising the prices so the number of travelers goes down?
(Fuck the guy / girl that decided to raise the price of D-Ticket)
The article is a bit superficial: there’s very little about what is being done to fix the problems. Off the top of my head, some of the measures being proposed or implemented include:
* a general overhaul of nearly all of the most important long-distance lines
* simplifying the process of securing funding for critical projects
* reducing red tape to lessen the risk of projects taking decades just to get greenlit
* recruitment drives
* cutting out a large chunk of middle management to streamline decision-making processes
* creating a “common welfare oriented” company to handle the infrastructure, meaning that any profit it makes must be re-invested into the infrastructure
* reforming the way contractors are handled so they cooperate better on a project, instead of each having a separate contract
There’s a lot more stuff, but I’m cautiously optimistic. I think the government has now got the message that a robust and reliable rail infrastructure is as crucial to the economy as a good road infrastructure is. The appointment of Evelyn Palla is a good sign: she has a good reputation, and so far the support of the train drivers’ union.
When I lived in Switzerland they used to apologize if the train was more than 2 minutes late.
The NIMBY-ism is too strong. The love of red tape too great.
I think there’s just no accountability/ethic to serve the community so even if there is a fix it will be extremely slow and probably bad. At this point it’s the mentality
Delay is ok but they just canceled all trains from Bonn to Cologne today after 15:00 wtf, there were hundred people at the station
Comments are closed.