Charles criticised for featuring Beatrice and Eugenie at family Christmas church walk only days after a fresh batch of Epstein files were released implicating Andrew
Posted by duckduck_flamingo
Charles criticised for featuring Beatrice and Eugenie at family Christmas church walk only days after a fresh batch of Epstein files were released implicating Andrew
Posted by duckduck_flamingo
17 comments
Agreed, they should lay low for a while.
Andrew is a total pedo, Mr. ‘find me some inappropriate friends.’
someone is always ready to criticize the royal family. as many people are praising him
Criticised for not holding kids accountable for their parents actions
Let’s not do a “sins of the father” with the royal family because baby…
Why? Are they responsible for their father’s actions? I feel like Charles is showing his support for them.
Criticize Andrew (and Fergie) for their behavior. That’s valid.
But Beatrice and Eugenie should not be painted with the same brush simply for being their progeny.
I see the enablers are commenting early.
They have never once denounced their father or mothers actions, they’re adults and they’re parents themselves, not teenagers to be mollycoddled. Eugenie campaigns against human trafficking yet says nothing about her father being complicit in it. They should either step up or step to the side.
They’re suffering enough, having those two buffoons as parents. Honestly I would feel sick knowing someone like that was my dad🤢
Why should the children suffer because of the sins of their father? Kids are not their parents you know.
Simple. They’re not their father.
The fact that Sykes seems to think the biggest problem with Andrew is poor judgment and grifting, and not being a horrific sexual predator and abuser, is infuriating and a pretty profound condemnation of Syke’s own complete lack moral judgment or compass.
Lumping the daughters’ “trading on privilege and proximity” in as part of the same problem as Andrew’s abuse of young women is wild, and if anything shows that Sykes doesn’t take those crimes seriously or value the rights and humanity of the women and girls Andrew harmed.
Neither daughter is responsible for the sins of her father.
Tom Sykes continuing to his mission to be the most toxic royal commentator around. He can’t distinguish himself in any other way, so this is his only superlative.
Andrew’s children are not responsible for Andrew’s actions.
Charles has enough faults to write a five volume novel, but this isn’t one of them. Why are we holding children accountable for the actions of their parents? They were literal children when this was happening at its peak, so they obviously weren’t complicit.
Charles did right here. He gave them a sense of belonging and normalcy – whatever that means in royal standards – and that they won’t be shunned due to their parent‘s actions.
To those of you saying they should publicly come out and denounce their parents – that’s hard for any child to do. Have you ever watched true crime documentaries, in which adult children are interviewed about their killer parents, and they cannot fully bring themselves to denounce the person who raised them?
Also, they did choose the firm on Christmas over their parents, and actions speak louder than words, so……
Yes, because they were definitely involved. Let’s punish them.
Sarcasm, obviously
Sins of the father should not impact his daughters. Wtf did they ever do?
Comments are closed.