Zelenskyy: Antennas are installed on rooftops in Belarus to guide Shahed drones

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2025/12/26/8013539/

17 comments

  1. Belarus is a party to the war since day 0. Lukashenka allowed Putin to use Belarus to commit the crime of aggression. They have hosted russian forces, supplied them. They have used belarussian territory to let russia continue to distract by threatening to invade from the North again. Belarus is a party to this war and any attacks on them were already justified. Now, who can blame Ukraine for going after those defense installations in belarus that are used daily to attack them? I think Ukraine should spook Belarus. It’s an extremely fragile country and russia could not hold belarus if civil unrest started like during the last stolen election.

  2. it would be hilarious if ukraine had antennas on the same freq that would redirect those guided bombs as a “return to sender”..and all it would cost was antennas

  3. shouldn’t matter when 99% of them get shot down every time….. lol

  4. Well, of course. Belarus was not only complicit in the attack, but actively supported it more than any other country.

    In my book, there are 2 aggressors here: Russia AND Belarus.

  6. Belarus China North Korea and many businesses out to make a buck

  7. If proven thrn they are legit targets. Send a warning to remove them or those spots will be attack as Russian military equpiment

  9. Always feels like Belarus is getting off easy, literally was a staging ground for the war and fully complicit in this whole thing.

  10. Got to put belarus dictator in his place and fully support the opposition! The people of belarus hate that old fuck!

  11. Where has he installed his antennas to guide his drones to Moscow?

    It’s so surreal. I don’t even know when he jokes or being serious.

  12. This is incredibly stupid by Belarus. They’ve made a ton of civilian buildings into legitimate military targets. If the war spirals into a regional conflict no air command will be able to justify sparing those targets if it means their own civilians are being hit by these missiles.

  13. Sounds like legitimate military targets to me. I wonder how long Lukashenko would remain in power if Belarus started getting hit and Russia was unable/unwilling to protect them.

  14. Why wouldn’t they be?

    In war, giving your enemies dilemmas is ideal. What is the difference between a dilemma and a problem? A problem has a very palatable solution that leaves your enemy happy. A dilemma has a solution that is sour to the taste and painful to deal with.

    Ukraine cannot do anything about Belarus, therefore this is a dilemma for Ukraine.

  15. While the role Belarus plays is highly frustrating and they’re very much getting off easy, Ukraine has no reason to expand the front by that much, while the Belarusian military is small and has low morale and involvement in the war might lead to widespread protest, they have no reason to risk it.
    Especially with it putting Kyiv at more risk of strikes.

    Belarus might be a headache, but Belarus actively involved in the war is just way more of a headache.

  16. Can’t see a downside to blowing them up. Lukashenko has no balls. He’s not going to go in full force.

Comments are closed.