I think we all know, grammatically, that should be “is rubbish”
As a United fan, this is unfortunately accurate reporting
why did they have to apologise for his ‘weather:rain everywhere’?
The most accurate BBC report for some time
As a developer, I would say this:
1. It should not be possible for training / test systems to “roll over” to live (or require those testing to remember to add a parameter / tick a box).
1. Always write training / test content as if it is going to be published live. (At the very least the content should be neutral so that even if it is published live, the content does not cause offence)
Some people can be offended by what you might find seemingly innocuous. Make the test content context-sensitive. ie. When building a site for an automotive business, make the test images (non-branded) cars, not random animals.
I look forward to all the rabid tabloid and Facebook commentary on how this means we should abolish the license fee.
This is the first non-propaganda piece from the BBC in quite some time!
I don’t watch the footie but I love little things like this, made me chuckle
I cannot fathom a single Utd fan would say otherwise. Fuck, if we had our way this would be plastered everywhere till we sort our shit.
They’re rubbish though so why apologise for the truth.
Fucking pussies backing down to whiny bitches who can’t handle the truth.
Days without an apology from the BBC for “We’re being pressured into sex by some trans women”: 210
At last – a fact on the BBC!
As a Manchester United fan, I don’t think it’s the BBC who need to apologise.
Let’s just thank our lucky stars it wasn’t ‘putin is a paedo’
It’s a factual statement. What are they apologising for?
I’m more offended it didn’t include Arsenal and Wet Spam in that news ticker 😂
16 comments
I think we all know, grammatically, that should be “is rubbish”
As a United fan, this is unfortunately accurate reporting
why did they have to apologise for his ‘weather:rain everywhere’?
The most accurate BBC report for some time
As a developer, I would say this:
1. It should not be possible for training / test systems to “roll over” to live (or require those testing to remember to add a parameter / tick a box).
1. Always write training / test content as if it is going to be published live. (At the very least the content should be neutral so that even if it is published live, the content does not cause offence)
Some people can be offended by what you might find seemingly innocuous. Make the test content context-sensitive. ie. When building a site for an automotive business, make the test images (non-branded) cars, not random animals.
I look forward to all the rabid tabloid and Facebook commentary on how this means we should abolish the license fee.
This is the first non-propaganda piece from the BBC in quite some time!
I don’t watch the footie but I love little things like this, made me chuckle
I cannot fathom a single Utd fan would say otherwise. Fuck, if we had our way this would be plastered everywhere till we sort our shit.
They’re rubbish though so why apologise for the truth.
Fucking pussies backing down to whiny bitches who can’t handle the truth.
Days without an apology from the BBC for “We’re being pressured into sex by some trans women”: 210
At last – a fact on the BBC!
As a Manchester United fan, I don’t think it’s the BBC who need to apologise.
Let’s just thank our lucky stars it wasn’t ‘putin is a paedo’
It’s a factual statement. What are they apologising for?
I’m more offended it didn’t include Arsenal and Wet Spam in that news ticker 😂