But then forested areas have to cut forest to make farmland ?
Good.
This is diversionary greenwashing .
The private banks and ECB will do anything to block global warming gas emission penalty tariffs.
Good
So, EU will ban food imports inside EU? I mean, most of EU is deforested area.
Good.
Well i hope they at least planned for the fact that people still need food, coffee and all that stuff. Oh wait, they actually allow the consumption of locust now right?
We dont want another situation where leaders act without thinking and the people pay for it like with all that green energy stuff and i bet there are more examples.
I bet food will get more expensive. And for what? So we can force those retarded rules and morals we force on ourselves also on others?
Dont get me wrong. All in all the eu is pretty usefull. Monkey together strong after all but god damn how bored are they in brussels or wherever those slackers are?
I dont think we need people to tell us how much we can roast sausages or how golden brown fries are allowed to be and we also dont need shock pictures on wine bottles.
Its funny how all this useless bs gets pushed trought and everything that could actually benefit the people or have a positive effect on them takes years or they decide to pause their sessions 10 times and continue later. And after all that the end result is something everyone hates, only companys profit from and the people get shit on. Its sickening.
I can guarantee if they ever proposed something everyone liked, it wouldnt take 20 years to push trough.
But noo its always some dumb shit like mass surveilance.
Excellent! But European companies also need to be honest and transparent when they are operating in other countries, i.e. not contributing to deforestation in Asia and South American for example.
How about banning food imports from dictatorships?
This is the way.
Whilst importing whole American trees to burn
Good.
Don’t worry, the banks will find a way around it
EU: Europe was deforested long ago, it doesn’t count, but you can’t do the same. Just like with carbon emissions.
Okay, how do you differentiate between a deforested area, or not?
Good
Nice.
Good
I can already taste some Bolsonaro tears
Love it
so no more argentinean beef?
So this will necessitate the creation of an official list of “deforested areas”. Expect some actually deforested areas to be excluded from the official list after a round of bribes.
Almost every European farm was once a forest.
That’s OK, the freshly deforested areas can also be sold to companies that plant trees for CO2 compensations in industrialised countries. Everybody wins! (/s, in case that wasn’t obvious)
Good.
Good.
Bann imports from dictatorships next please.
How is this something to be decided at a European level? Surely each country should be able to decide for itself.
29 comments
So… All of Europe, then?
But then forested areas have to cut forest to make farmland ?
Good.
This is diversionary greenwashing .
The private banks and ECB will do anything to block global warming gas emission penalty tariffs.
Good
So, EU will ban food imports inside EU? I mean, most of EU is deforested area.
Good.
Well i hope they at least planned for the fact that people still need food, coffee and all that stuff. Oh wait, they actually allow the consumption of locust now right?
We dont want another situation where leaders act without thinking and the people pay for it like with all that green energy stuff and i bet there are more examples.
I bet food will get more expensive. And for what? So we can force those retarded rules and morals we force on ourselves also on others?
Dont get me wrong. All in all the eu is pretty usefull. Monkey together strong after all but god damn how bored are they in brussels or wherever those slackers are?
I dont think we need people to tell us how much we can roast sausages or how golden brown fries are allowed to be and we also dont need shock pictures on wine bottles.
Its funny how all this useless bs gets pushed trought and everything that could actually benefit the people or have a positive effect on them takes years or they decide to pause their sessions 10 times and continue later. And after all that the end result is something everyone hates, only companys profit from and the people get shit on. Its sickening.
I can guarantee if they ever proposed something everyone liked, it wouldnt take 20 years to push trough.
But noo its always some dumb shit like mass surveilance.
Excellent! But European companies also need to be honest and transparent when they are operating in other countries, i.e. not contributing to deforestation in Asia and South American for example.
How about banning food imports from dictatorships?
This is the way.
Whilst importing whole American trees to burn
Good.
Don’t worry, the banks will find a way around it
EU: Europe was deforested long ago, it doesn’t count, but you can’t do the same. Just like with carbon emissions.
Okay, how do you differentiate between a deforested area, or not?
Good
Nice.
Good
I can already taste some Bolsonaro tears
Love it
so no more argentinean beef?
So this will necessitate the creation of an official list of “deforested areas”. Expect some actually deforested areas to be excluded from the official list after a round of bribes.
Almost every European farm was once a forest.
That’s OK, the freshly deforested areas can also be sold to companies that plant trees for CO2 compensations in industrialised countries. Everybody wins! (/s, in case that wasn’t obvious)
Good.
Good.
Bann imports from dictatorships next please.
How is this something to be decided at a European level? Surely each country should be able to decide for itself.