Read our Monthly Magazine

And support our mission to provide fearless stories about and outside the media system

The Home Office has been accused of treating asylum seekers like “lab rats” after moving to “warehouse” the first batch of migrants into a military barracks, despite opposition from campaigners and local politicians.

Twenty-seven men have been moved into the Crowborough military barracks, as part of the Government’s plans to move migrants from hotels to military sites.

The site in East Sussex has a capacity of 500 bed spaces, allocated for single adult males, who will be housed there for up to three months while their claims are processed. If their asylum application is rejected, the department say they will be removed from the country.

The plans have already triggered anti-migrant protests in the local area, prompting fears about an increase in far-right activity.

Conservative MP for Sussex Weald Nusrat Ghani has warned of the “grave impact” of moving the men onto the site.

In a letter to Immigration Minister Alex Norris on Wednesday, seen by Byline Times, Ghani stated that there was “clear evidence that the site is not an empty army barracks, but a functioning and much used and loved training camp”. Crowborough is currently used as a training facility for the local Royal Air Force Cadets and for fire, police and other public service agencies.

She added that the site was “unable to be signed off as safe, legal and compliant, and one of the reasons was the cost and displacement of services and the Cadets”. Despite asking yesterday for a detailed assessment of how the Home Office intended to “square that circle”, the first migrants were moved to Crowborough this morning.

Wealden District Council leader James Partridge has also voiced opposition to the plans, saying it was the “wrong decision”. Protests have taken place around the site on a weekly basis since last October when the plans were first announced. “Despite our strong objections, the minister [Alex Norris] has not listened to us,” Partridge said.

Crowborough East Sussex thousands protest against the Government’s plan to house 600 asylum seekers in an army camp in the town. Photo: Adrian Looby

The latest move marks the start of the Government’s plans to ‘warehouse’ asylum seekers in former military camps in an attempt to close hotels by the end of this parliament. More than 200 hotels remain in use, at a cost of more than £5.7 million per day. The Home Office has consistently said that hotels are a “pull factor” for small boat crossings. 

Campaigners have described the use of former military sites to accommodate asylum seekers as a “sleeper issue”, with the potential for protests starting at a local level to become more widespread.

“It’s like they’re using asylum seekers as lab rats,” said Lou Calvey, Director of Asylum Matters. “The Government should be building policy in the interests of people in local communities – a fiscally-responsible policy – but they’re not even doing that. When are they going to wake up? We know these sites are incredibly damaging and this will only mean more community tensions and problems.”

EXCLUSIVE

British academic and his Nigerian wife repeatedly stopped from hosting family members, including at their own wedding, due to visa restrictions brought in by Keir Starmer’s Government

Nicola Kelly

A report from the National Audit Office last year found that military barracks were projected to cost £46 million more than hotels over the next decade. A leaked forecast from the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) warned that the expected cost to house asylum seekers has tripled from £4.5 billion to £15.3 billion for contracts from 2019-2029.

In a statement released this morning, the Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said that opening Crowborough camp was “just the start”. 

“I will bring forward site after site until every asylum hotel is closed and returned to local communities,” Mahmood said.

In October, the Government announced it would also open Cameron barracks in Inverness to house asylum seekers. Liberal Democrat MP Angus Macdonald described the decision to move 300 men to the site as “odd”, adding that the camp is in the city centre, close to asylum hotels. Transferring asylum seekers from the city centre to the camp was, he said, “effectively the same thing”.

Sources recently told Byline Times that local Labour MPs have refused to look at military sites in their constituencies as they do not want to give rise to local community tensions.

The Government is also looking at student halls, pre-fabricated portacabins and Nightingale-style hospitals used during the Covid pandemic as alternative accommodation options. 

More than 1,240 men are currently held at Wethersfield camp in Essex where unexploded ordnance was recently found. Napier barracks in Folkestone, which housed 400 people, has recently closed following the cancellation of the contract. The site had been mired in controversy including, most recently, allegations of sexual harassment from staff contracted to work for Stay Belvedere Hotels. The site has now been handed back to the Ministry of Defence.

In a statement this morning, the Home Secretary said: “Illegal migration has been placing immense pressure on communities. I will not rest until order and control of our borders is restored.”

ENJOYING THIS ARTICLE? HELP US TO PRODUCE MORE

Receive the monthly Byline Times newspaper and help to support fearless, independent journalism that breaks stories, shapes the agenda and holds power to account.

We’re not funded by a billionaire oligarch or an offshore hedge-fund. We rely on our readers to fund our journalism. If you like what we do, please subscribe.