AI-powered Software Development Is A Strategic Imperative— How To Lead The Change – New Technology

The software engineering landscape is experiencing its most
dramatic transformation in decades. While executives debate whether
artificial intelligence is merely another technological trend, the
data tells a starkly different story: companies that strategically
implement AI across their software development lifecycle are
achievinggame-changingproductivity gains, while those that
don’t risk being left behind by more agile, AI-enabled
competitors. 

The message is clear—software engineering excellence
powered by AI isn’t just an opportunity; it’s a strategic
imperative. Yet, most organizations are approaching this
transformation with the wrong mindset, treating AI as a simple
add-on tool suite rather than the catalyst for fundamental
organizational change it actually represents. To successfully
address thistransformation,a holistic program is required.

The competitive divide is already
here 

The numbers paint a compelling picture of an industry in rapid
transition. Microsoft reports that AI now writes 20-30% of its
internal code, while Mark Zuckerberg has set the ambitious goal of
having AI handle half of Meta’s coding by 2026. These
aren’t distant aspirations—they’re current realities
that are reshaping competitive dynamics. 

Meanwhile, GitHub Copilot users are completing tasks 55% faster
than their non-AI-enabled counterparts, while IBM Software reports
observing productivity increases of 30-40% in software development
areas such as code documentation, explanation, and test case
generation. But here’s the critical insight most executives
miss: these productivity gains don’t automatically translate to
business value without the proper organizational
foundation. 

The hidden barriers to AI-driven
success 

Through our experience with dozens of software engineering
transformations, we’ve identified five critical constraints
that prevent organizations from realizing AI’s full
potential: 

Overreliance on Technology Output
KPIs 

Many organizations focus on technical metrics rather than business
impact. Without ROI-led prioritization and capacity discipline that
ties product work to business value, teams may produce more code
faster without creating more value. 

Limited realization of automation
benefits 

The prevalence of manual processes across the entire software
lifecycle means that AI-driven automation can only unlock value
after fixing underlying processes and organizational setup. As our
analysis reveals, automating broken models first amplifies
inefficiency, not impact. 

Organically Grown Organizations 

Product and technology organizations are often overbuilt, driven by
a “more personnel equals better outcomes” mindset. These
oversized teams and in particular overloaded support functions add
complexity, slow decision-making, and dilute
accountability—creating friction that neutralizes AI’s
speed advantages. 

Missing consideration of skill-shift

The use of AI technologies will ultimately reduce or fundamentally
change the skill requirements of the broader engineering workforce
towards more “skill-dense” and experienced profiles.
 We do not see this challenge being strategically addressed in
most companies.

Underestimating the Change Management
Required 

Organizations often treat AI adoption as a technology deployment
rather than an organizational shift. Teams need time to learn new
workflows, adapt existing processes, and build confidence with AI
tools. Without proper change management, even the best AI
implementations struggle to gain meaningful traction across
development teams. 

A comprehensive framework for AI-enabled
excellence 

Based on our extensive experience helping organizations navigate
transformation in software engineering, we’ve developed a
five-step framework that addresses both the technical and
organizational dimensions of theaforementioned barriers:

Benchmark and target setting 

Before implementing AI tools, establish clear performance
baselines andvalue-based investment targetsaligned
to business strategy. This includes benchmarking against peers and
industry leaders while adjusting for business model complexity and
maturity stage. 

Overarchingdiagnosticon SDLC
performance 

Conduct a comprehensive assessment across four critical
dimensions: Quality, Productivity, Predictability, and
Organizational Talent. This diagnostic identifies
bottom-line-relevant pain points for deeper analysis and shows how
operational metrics, such as deployment frequency, change failure
rate, change lead time, and failed deployment recovery time,impact
bottom-line value.

Analysis of each SDLC process
step 

Deep-dive into pain point dimensions across the software
development lifecycle, from concept through deployment. Our
analysisshowsthevalue of AI varies significantly by
stage—25-40% productivity gains in build and test phases,
compared to 15-25% productivity in concept and design, and these
productivity gains do not automatically translate into bottom-line
value.

Redesign organizational model and skill
profiles 

This is where most organizations stumble. AI doesn’t just
change how code gets written—it fundamentally alters role
responsibilities and skill requirements. Based on our analysis,
successful transformations require updating role fidelity,
right-sizing layers, and rebalancing skill-mix and capacity across
the software development lifecycle. 

Iterative integration and
implementation 

Launch structured pilots with lighthouse products and teams,
measure impact through established metrics, and scale across the
organization based on proven results. The key is coordinated
implementation across process, tooling, and organizational
levers. 

Follow our series to learn more about key success factors and
successful implementations. Our next article will focus on
product-centric software development organizations. 

The authors gratefully acknowledge co-authorship of Florian
Nie and Niklas Heckmann and valuable contributions from Stefan
Stroh, FilipFlögel,and Qiuyue Zhang.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.