SEC slaps advisor with penalty for hiding SPAC conflict of interest

The SEC sanctioned a California advisor for hiding conflicts of interest while investing $160 million of client money in a SPAC deal.

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on January 16 that it sanctioned Engaged Capital, a Newport Beach firm managing about $652 million, for failing to disclose conflicts in a SPAC transaction involving Black Rifle Coffee Company.

The case offers a cautionary tale for advisors navigating complex deals where their financial interests might cloud their judgment. And the fact pattern here is pretty straightforward.

Back in February 2021, Engaged bought into a SPAC sponsor that would eventually merge with Black Rifle Coffee. The firm put up roughly $3.3 million for founders’ shares and warrants, splitting the investment with clients taking 80 percent and Engaged plus its employees keeping 20 percent.

Those founders’ shares came with a catch. They would only be worth something if the SPAC actually completed a merger. No deal meant no value.

Fast forward to February 2022. Engaged invested $160.25 million of client assets through a forward purchase agreement and private investment in public equity to help finance the very same SPAC merger. The firm’s employees had money in those client funds too, about 4.7 percent.

You can see where this is going. The client investments Engaged made in 2022 were necessary to close the deal that would make the founders’ shares and warrants from 2021 actually worth something. Engaged had skin in the game on both sides, but clients never heard about it.

The SEC said this created obvious conflicts. Engaged had every reason to push the deal through, whether or not it made sense for clients. The size of the investment, the terms, even the decision to invest at all could have been influenced by what was good for Engaged rather than what was good for clients.

The kicker is what happened after the deal closed. The SPAC sponsor shares that Engaged and its employees held went up in value. Meanwhile, the client investments that helped make that happen went down.

The agency found Engaged violated Section 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act, which basically says you cannot engage in any practice that operates as fraud or deceit on clients. The legal standard here is worth noting because you do not even need to prove the firm intended to deceive anyone. Negligence is enough.

Engaged agreed to settle without admitting or denying wrongdoing. The firm got censured and has to pay a $200,000 penalty. The Commission also issued a cease and desist order.

That $200,000 fine might seem light given the dollar amounts involved, but the real cost is reputational. And the compliance takeaway is clear. When you have a financial interest in an investment you are recommending to clients, you need to tell them. Every time.

SPAC deals have attracted regulatory attention precisely because of these kinds of conflicts. Sponsors often get favorable terms that create incentives to close deals regardless of quality. When advisors wear multiple hats in these transactions, disclosure becomes critical.

For advisors managing client assets, this case underscores something fundamental. Your fiduciary duty means putting client interests first, and when your interests might not align with theirs, transparency is not optional. The SEC is watching, and silence can be costly.