Financial technology trade groups, led by the American Fintech Council, are urging the Federal Reserve to move forward with a plan that would give certain non-bank financial firms direct access to U.S. payment rails.
“A well-designed payment account can expand competition and responsible innovation in payments without introducing new risk,” Phil Goldfeder, CEO of the American Fintech Council, said in a statement on Monday.
A payment account is a limited Federal Reserve account that allows certain financial firms to send and settle payments directly, without granting them full banking privileges.
The push comes as the Fed reviews responses to its Request for Information on whether to test a limited-purpose Reserve Bank account designed for payments activity.
At issue is whether the Fed should offer a narrowly scoped account that allows eligible institutions to clear and settle payments directly on the central bank’s balance sheet without granting a full Master Account.
The proposal would cap overnight balances, pay no interest, bar access to the discount window, and limit use to final-settlement systems such as Fedwire and potentially FedNow.
Fintech groups backing the proposal say the current system requires payment firms to rely on sponsor banks, which they argue increases costs, slows settlement, and concentrates operational dependencies.
These groups are looking at the payment account as a way to provide direct settlement access without extending lending authority or deposit-taking functions. Bank trade groups, however, see it differently.
What Trump’s Fed Pick Kevin Warsh Means for Crypto
In a joint submission filed last week, the Bank Policy Institute, The Clearing House Association, and the Financial Services Forum warned that the proposal represents a fundamental policy shift by enabling uninsured or lightly supervised institutions to connect directly to the Fed’s balance sheet.
The banks argue that even with balance caps and other limits, Payment Accounts could still increase run risk and financial instability by supporting deposit-like activity outside the federal safety net.
They explicitly flag stablecoin issuance and other crypto-adjacent models as examples of activities that resemble deposit-taking but lack deposit insurance, resolution regimes, and consolidated supervision.
While the proposal does not mention crypto explicitly, banks argue that stablecoin issuers and crypto-linked institutions are among the most likely beneficiaries of a tailored account that allows direct settlement in central bank money.