Get insights on thousands of stocks from the global community of over 7 million individual investors at Simply Wall St.

FirstEnergy (NYSE:FE) subsidiaries have selected the Fort Martin site in West Virginia for a proposed 1,200-megawatt natural gas power plant.

The project would expand the company’s generation portfolio and is subject to regulatory approvals and permitting.

The planned facility is positioned to support regional grid reliability and customer affordability objectives over the long term.

For you as an investor, this planned 1,200-megawatt plant adds detail to how FirstEnergy, a regulated electric utility, is thinking about its future generation mix. Natural gas remains a key fuel source in many U.S. power markets, and large projects like this often relate to broader themes such as capacity needs, retirements of older plants, and evolving environmental requirements.

Looking ahead, the Fort Martin proposal raises questions you may want to track, including regulatory review outcomes, potential project timelines, and how any construction and operating costs are treated in rate structures. The way these elements ultimately align could affect FirstEnergy’s capital spending profile, risk exposures, and long term role in serving regional electricity demand.

Stay updated on the most important news stories for FirstEnergy by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on FirstEnergy.

NYSE:FE Earnings & Revenue Growth as at Feb 2026

NYSE:FE Earnings & Revenue Growth as at Feb 2026

We’ve flagged 2 risks for FirstEnergy. See which could impact your investment.

For FirstEnergy, picking the Fort Martin site gives more color on how it is trying to balance capacity needs, grid reliability, and its regulated-utility business model. A 1,200-megawatt gas plant is a sizeable asset that can support load growth and help back up intermittent resources such as solar in its Integrated Resource Plan. That fits with the company’s recent focus on grid reliability work in New Jersey and broader transmission and distribution upgrades in Ohio. Taken together, these point to long term, capital-intensive investment. For you as an investor, this kind of project typically means more assets in the regulated rate base over time. It also involves a multi-year build and approval cycle that adds execution and regulatory risk.

The Fort Martin gas plant aligns with the narrative that FirstEnergy is leaning into grid and capacity investment to support long term electricity demand and reliability, complementing its transmission upgrades and New Jersey reliability projects.

The project could test the narrative’s focus on financial discipline, because another large asset on top of an already heavy capex program may put more pressure on funding, debt levels, and returns if regulators do not fully support cost recovery.

The mix of new gas generation and planned solar projects may not be fully captured in existing narratives that emphasize grid infrastructure, so the balance between fossil and renewable additions is an extra angle for you to consider.

Knowing what a company is worth starts with understanding its story. Check out one of the top narratives in the Simply Wall St Community for FirstEnergy to help decide what it is worth to you.

⚠️ Large, long dated gas projects add construction, permitting, and regulatory risk, especially if views on decarbonization policy or gas-fired generation change during the build period.

⚠️ The project could increase financing needs for a company where analysts have already flagged that interest payments are not well covered by earnings and that sustained capex could pressure free cash flow.

🎁 If approved and added to the regulated rate base, the plant could support more predictable returns on invested capital and complement FirstEnergy’s reliability-focused grid upgrades.

🎁 A balanced portfolio that includes gas and new solar capacity may help the company manage reliability while responding to changing customer demand and policy trends across its service territories.

From here, the key things to watch are how the West Virginia Public Service Commission and other stakeholders respond to the Fort Martin proposal, what cost and timing details FirstEnergy ultimately discloses, and how the project fits into its broader capex and funding plans. You may also want to track how this plant, together with ongoing grid and solar projects, affects discussions about earnings mix, balance sheet strength, and future rate cases compared with peers such as Duke Energy, American Electric Power, and Exelon.

To stay up to date on how the latest news impacts the investment narrative for FirstEnergy, head to the community page for FirstEnergy to follow the top community narratives.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Companies discussed in this article include FE.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com