I think this needs attention from everyone, how they destroyed part of our culture.

18 comments

1. Nechapu jak toto starosta Zdenek Hrib mohl dopustit

   Uz ad sou volby!!

2. It’s not destroyed, they made a replica. The replica is not faithful to the original, but the original is preserved.

3. Nothing is destroyed, it is a replica, but it is a shitty replica.

4. Potato Jesus comes to mind:

   https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/011/187/ecchomo.jpg

5. Shitty replica by some idiot pretending to be artist.

6. [http://www.artrestorer.cz/](http://www.artrestorer.cz/) – on top is email address, you can send “painter” your honest opinion.

7. Mom: we have orloj at home

   Orloj at home:

8. Je to osklive, prijde mi to jako nepovedena parodie.

9. It’s bad copy of a replica. Don’t worry, the original is fine.

   The renewed one isn’t that bad imo, if we take it as a new piece. I actually like it more than the previous. However, the goal was to make it same as the old one, which the artist failed to do.

10. I’m one of the few who likes the new version more

11. A co teprve až se zjistí, podle koho to namaloval.. 🙂

12. Artistically it’s great, but as a faithfull replica… uhhhh…

13. The Brno Clock wins again, can Prague get a W?

14. Tak zaprve je to docela fuserska práce, jako kdyby malíř neznal základní anatomii, za druhy je vtipný ze si toho všimli až takhle po letech, dyt to dělal 2 nebo 3 roky zpátky

15. I mean, it’s ugly, but how is it vandalism? No property was destroyed. I’m not sure there was a way to say “kopie” any more times in the article… It’s a shitty, shitty job, but nothing has been destroyed or vandalized.

16. trolling is a art

17. Mom, I want to see the astronomical clock.

    No, we have astranomical clock at home.

    Astranomical clock at home…

18. Příšerný amaterismus – to byla snaha vytvořit fotorealistickou malbu? Totální hnůj, za tohle nakopat do p.