Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12, e0185809 (2017).
Rigal, S. et al. Farmland practices are driving bird population decline across Europe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2216573120 (2023).
Mancini, F. et al. Invertebrate biodiversity continues to decline in cropland. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 290, 20230897 (2023).
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).
Proença, V. et al. Global biodiversity monitoring: from data sources to essential biodiversity variables. Biol. Conserv. 213, 256–263 (2017).
Santana, J. et al. Large biodiversity monitoring gaps remain across Europe. Conserv. Lett. 18, e13134 (2025).
Santana, J. et al. D3.2 Report on gaps and important new areas for monitoring in Europe. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e103657 (2023).
Morán-Ordóñez, A. et al. D3.3 Identification of current monitoring workflows and bottlenecks. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e103765 (2023).
Moersberger, H. et al. Biodiversity monitoring in Europe: user and policy needs. Conserv. Lett. 17, e13038 (2024).
Wetzel, F. T. et al. Unlocking biodiversity data: prioritization and filling the gaps in biodiversity observation data in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 221, 78–85 (2018).
Morán-Ordóñez, A., Martí Pino, D. & Brotons, L. D. 3.1 Inventory of current European network for monitoring. Web-based database. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e109168 (2023).
Pereira, H. M. et al. Europa Biodiversity Observation Network: integrating data streams to support policy. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e81207 (2022).
Langer, C. et al. The EuropaBON stakeholder dashboard: a dynamic web application to map Europe’s biodiversity community. PLoS ONE 20, e0329390 (2025).
Moersberger, H. et al. Europa Biodiversity Observation Network: user and policy needs assessment. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e84517 (2022).
Pereira, H. M. et al. Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339, 277–278 (2013).
Junker, J. et al. D4.1. Revised list and specifications of EBVs and EESVs for a European wide biodiversity observation network. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e102530 (2023).
Lumbierres, M. et al. EuropaBON EBV workflow templates. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10680435 (2024).
Pereira, H. M. et al. in The GEO Handbook on Biodiversity Observation Networks (eds Walters, M. & Scholes, R. J.) 79–105 (Springer International, 2017).
Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G. & Waples, R. S. Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 25–33 (2007).
Buchner, D. et al. Upscaling biodiversity monitoring: metabarcoding estimates 31,846 insect species from malaise traps across Germany. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 25, e14023 (2024).
Miya, M. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: a novel method for biodiversity monitoring of marine fish communities. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 14, 161–185 (2022).
Remmel, N. et al. DNA metabarcoding and morphological identification reveal similar richness, taxonomic composition and body size patterns among flying insect communities. Insect Conserv. Divers. 17, 449–463 (2024).
Zanovello, L. et al. Validation of an eDNA-based workflow for monitoring inter- and intra-specific CytB haplotype diversity of alpine amphibians. Environ. DNA 6, e573 (2024).
Skidmore, A. K. et al. Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 896–906 (2021).
Bruelheide, H. et al. D5.2 Past-to-present EBV modelled datasets and status indicator for selected terrestrial habitats in the habitats directive. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e128158 (2024).
Camia, A. et al. Earth Observation in Support of EU Policies for Biodiversity—A Deep-Dive Assessment of the Knowledge Centre on Earth Observation (Publications Office of the European Union, 2023).
Shamoun-Baranes, J. et al. Weather radars’ role in biodiversity monitoring. Science 372, 248 (2021).
Desmet, P. et al. Biological data derived from European weather radars. Sci. Data 12, 361 (2025).
Bauer, S., Tielens, E. K. & Haest, B. Monitoring aerial insect biodiversity: a radar perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 379, 20230113 (2024).
Kissling, W. D. et al. Towards consistently measuring and monitoring habitat condition with airborne laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicles. Ecol. Indic. 169, 112970 (2024).
Shi, Y., Wang, J. & Kissling, W. D. Multi-temporal high-resolution data products of ecosystem structure derived from country-wide airborne laser scanning surveys of the Netherlands. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 3641–3677 (2025).
Chandler, M. et al. Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 213, 280–294 (2017).
Fritz, S. et al. Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 922–930 (2019).
Sheard, J. K. et al. Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 379, 20230106 (2024).
Jetz, W. et al. Essential Biodiversity Variables for mapping and monitoring species populations. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 539–551 (2019).
Sullivan, B. L. et al. eBird: a citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2282–2292 (2009).
van Strien, A. J., van Zweden, J. S., Sparrius, L. B. & Odé, B. Improving citizen science data for long-term monitoring of plant species in the Netherlands. Biodivers. Conserv. 31, 2781–2796 (2022).
Collins, R., France, A., Walker, M. & Browning, S. The potential for freshwater citizen science to engage and empower: a case study of the rivers trusts, United Kingdom. Front. Environ. Sci. 11, 1218055 (2023).
Rock, B. M. & Daru, B. H. Impediments to understanding seagrasses’ response to global change. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 608867 (2021).
von Gönner, J. et al. Citizen science shows that small agricultural streams in Germany are in a poor ecological status. Sci. Total. Environ. 922, 171183 (2024).
Besson, M. et al. Towards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities. Ecol. Lett. 25, 2753–2775 (2022).
Tuia, D. et al. Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation. Nat. Commun. 13, 792 (2022).
Kissling, W. D. et al. Development of a cost-efficient automated wildlife camera network in a European Natura 2000 site. Basic. Appl. Ecol. 79, 141–152 (2024).
Leese, F. et al. Improved freshwater macroinvertebrate detection from environmental DNA through minimized nontarget amplification. Environ. DNA 3, 261–276 (2021).
Yu, D. W. et al. Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 613–623 (2012).
Altermatt, F. et al. Utilizing aquatic environmental DNA to address global biodiversity targets. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1, 332–346 (2025).
Zemanova, M. A. Noninvasive genetic assessment is an effective wildlife research tool when compared with other approaches. Genes 12, 1672 (2021).
EFTAS Fernerkundung Technologietransfer GmbH, Institute for Agroecology and Biodiversity (IFAB) & Environment Agency Austria (EEA). EMBAL Survey Manual 2021 (European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment, 2021).
European Commission. European Monitoring of Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes (EMBAL). JRC data https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset/723355a8-e549-4691-9c0d-83ab7fc7a0c4 (2025).
European Environment Agency. Catchments and Rivers Network System ECRINS v1.1—Rationales, Building and Improving for Widening Uses to Water Accounts and WISE Applications (Publications Office of the European Union, 2012).
Globevnik, L., Koprivsek, M. & Snoj, L. Metadata to the MARS spatial database. Freshw. Metadata J. 21, 1–7 (2017).
Metzger, M. J., Bunce, R. G. H., Jongman, R. H. G., Mücher, C. A. & Watkins, J. W. A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14, 549–563 (2005).
Costello, M. J., Basher, Z., Sayre, R., Breyer, S. & Wright, D. J. Stratifying ocean sampling globally and with depth to account for environmental variability. Sci. Rep. 8, 11259 (2018).
Lyche Solheim, A. et al. A new broad typology for rivers and lakes in Europe: development and application for large-scale environmental assessments. Sci. Total. Environ. 697, 134043 (2019).
Jongman, R. H. G. et al. Objectives and applications of a statistical environmental stratification of Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 21, 409–419 (2006).
Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).
Carvalho, L. et al. Sustaining recreational quality of European lakes: minimizing the health risks from algal blooms through phosphorus control. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 315–323 (2013).
Ellis, E. C. Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere. Ecol. Monogr. 85, 287–331 (2015).
Jänicke, C., Petersen, K. A., Schmidts, P., Müller, D. & Jepsen, M. R. Field and farm-level data on agricultural land use for the European Union. Sci. Data 12, 1050 (2025).
Agnesi, S. et al. Spatial Analysis of Marine Protected Area Networks in Europe’s Seas III. 40 (European Topic Centre on Inland, Coastal and Marine waters (ETC/ICM), 2020).
Hermoso, V., Morán-Ordóñez, A., Lanzas, M. & Brotons, L. Designing a network of green infrastructure for the EU. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 196, 103732 (2020).
Hoffmann, S., Beierkuhnlein, C., Field, R., Provenzale, A. & Chiarucci, A. Uniqueness of protected areas for conservation strategies in the European Union. Sci. Rep. 8, 6445 (2018).
Belletti, B. et al. More than one million barriers fragment Europe’s rivers. Nature 588, 436–441 (2020).
Keller, M., Schimel, D. S., Hargrove, W. W. & Hoffman, F. M. A continental strategy for the national ecological observatory network. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 282–284 (2008).
Guerin, G. R., Williams, K. J., Leitch, E., Lowe, A. J. & Sparrow, B. Using generalised dissimilarity modelling and targeted field surveys to gap-fill an ecosystem surveillance network. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 766–776 (2021).
Carvalho, S. B., Gonçalves, J., Guisan, A. & Honrado, J. P. Systematic site selection for multispecies monitoring networks. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 1305–1316 (2016).
Wägele, J. W. et al. Towards a multisensor station for automated biodiversity monitoring. Basic. Appl. Ecol. 59, 105–138 (2022).
Thorpe, A. S. et al. Introduction to the sampling designs of the national ecological observatory network terrestrial observation system. Ecosphere 7, e01627 (2016).
Potts, S. G. et al. Proposal for an EU Pollinator Monitoring Scheme. Report No. EUR 30416 EN (Publications Office of the European Union, 2021).
Moe, S. J., Mentzel, S., Welch, S. A. & Lyche Solheim, A. From national monitoring to transnational indicators: reporting and processing of aquatic biology data under the European Environment Agency’s state of the environment data flow. Front. Environ. Sci. 11, 1057742 (2023).
Elmendorf, S. C. et al. The plant phenology monitoring design for the national ecological observatory network. Ecosphere 7, e01303 (2016).
Rapinel, S., Panhelleux, L., Lalanne, A. & Hubert-Moy, L. Combined use of environmental and spectral variables with vegetation archives for large-scale modeling of grassland habitats. Prog. Phys. Geogr.: Earth Environ. 46, 3–27 (2022).
Musinsky, J. et al. Spanning scales: the airborne spatial and temporal sampling design of the national ecological observatory network. Methods Ecol. Evol. 13, 1866–1884 (2022).
Patrício, J. et al. European marine biodiversity monitoring networks: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 161 (2016).
Valdez, J. W. et al. The undetectability of global biodiversity trends using local species richness. Ecography 2023, e06604 (2023).
Nielsen, S. E., Haughland, D. L., Bayne, E. & Schieck, J. Capacity of large-scale, long-term biodiversity monitoring programmes to detect trends in species prevalence. Biodivers. Conserv. 18, 2961–2978 (2009).
Pearman, P. B. et al. Monitoring of species’ genetic diversity in Europe varies greatly and overlooks potential climate change impacts. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 267–281 (2024).
Gonzalez, A. et al. A global biodiversity observing system to unite monitoring and guide action. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1947–1952 (2023).
Hoban, S. et al. Global genetic diversity status and trends: towards a suite of Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) for genetic composition. Biol. Rev. 97, 1511–1538 (2022).
Biggs, J., von Fumetti, S. & Kelly-Quinn, M. The importance of small waterbodies for biodiversity and ecosystem services: implications for policy makers. Hydrobiologia 793, 3–39 (2017).
Stubbington, R. et al. Biomonitoring of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams in Europe: current practice and priorities to enhance ecological status assessments. Sci. Total. Environ. 618, 1096–1113 (2018).
Jessop, A. et al. Overview and Assessment of the Current State of Marine Biodiversity Monitoring in the European Union and Adjacent Marine Waters (RTD/2021/MV/11) (European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 2022).
Weigand, H. et al. DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: gap-analysis and recommendations for future work. Sci. Total. Environ. 678, 499–524 (2019).
Lumbierres, M. et al. Towards implementing workflows for Essential Biodiversity Variables at a European scale. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 62, e03699 (2025).
Lumbierres, M. & Kissling, W. D. Important first steps towards designing the freshwater, marine and terrestrial Essential Biodiversity Variable (EBV) workflows for the European Biodiversity Observation Network. Res. Ideas Outcomes 9, e109120 (2023).
Fernández, N., Ferrier, S., Navarro, L. M. & Pereira, H. M. in Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity (eds Cavender-Bares, J., Gamon, J. A. & Townsend, P. A.) 485–501 (Springer International, 2020).
Kissling, W. D. et al. Building Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) of species distribution and abundance at a global scale. Biol. Rev. 93, 600–625 (2018).
Boyd, R. J. et al. An operational workflow for producing periodic estimates of species occupancy at national scales. Biol. Rev. 98, 1492–1508 (2023).
Fernández, N. et al. D5.7. Report on the use of multiple EBV data streams and derived indicators for cross-cutting assessments of biodiversity. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e129447 (2024).
Tulloch, A. I. T., Hagger, V. & Greenville, A. C. Ecological forecasts to inform near-term management of threats to biodiversity. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5816–5828 (2020).
Capinha, C., Monteiro, A. T. & Ceia-Hasse, A. Supporting early detection of biological invasions through short-term spatial forecasts of detectability. NeoBiota 96, 191–210 (2024).
Capinha, C. et al. Using citizen science data for predicting the timing of ecological phenomena across regions. BioScience 74, 383–392 (2024).
Ceia-Hasse, A., Sousa, C. A., Gouveia, B. R. & Capinha, C. Forecasting the abundance of disease vectors with deep learning. Ecol. Inform. 78, 102272 (2023).
Bradarić, M., Kranstauber, B., Bouten, W. & Shamoun-Baranes, J. Forecasting nocturnal bird migration for dynamic aeroconservation: the value of short-term datasets. J. Appl. Ecol. 61, 1147–1158 (2024).
Dennis, E. B., Morgan, B. J. T., Freeman, S. N., Brereton, T. M. & Roy, D. B. A generalized abundance index for seasonal invertebrates. Biometrics 72, 1305–1314 (2016).
Van Swaay, C. A. M. et al. The EU Butterfly Indicator for Grassland species: 1990–2017. Butterfly Conservation Europe & ABLE/eBMS www.butterfly-monitoring.net (2019).
van Swaay, C. M., Nowicki, P., Settele, J. & van Strien, A. Butterfly monitoring in Europe: methods, applications and perspectives. Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 3455–3469 (2008).
Lyche Solheim, A., Thrane, J.-E., Mentzel, S. & Moe, S. J. Harmonised biological indicators for rivers and lakes: towards European assessment of temporal trends in ecological quality. Ecol. Indic. 171, 113207 (2025).
Liquete, C. et al. D2.3 EuropaBON Proposal for an EU Biodiversity Observation Coordination Centre (EBOCC). Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e128042 (2024).
Leung, B. & Gonzalez, A. Global monitoring for biodiversity: uncertainty, risk, and power analyses to support trend change detection. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj1448 (2024).
Isaac, N. J. B. et al. Data integration for large-scale models of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 56–67 (2020).
European Commission et al. Refined Proposal for an EU Pollinator Monitoring Scheme (Publications Office of the European Union, 2024).
Wägele, J. W. & Tschan, G. F. (eds) Weather Stations for Biodiversity: A Comprehensive Approach to an Automated and Modular Monitoring System Vol. 1 (Pensoft, 2024).
Abecasis, D. et al. A review of acoustic telemetry in Europe and the need for a regional aquatic telemetry network. Anim. Biotelemetry 6, 12 (2018).
ENETWILD-consortium et al. Wild boar density data generated by camera trapping in nineteen European areas. EFSA Supporting Publ. 19, 7214E (2022).
ENETWILD-consortium et al. Wild ungulate density data generated by camera trapping in 37 European areas: first output of the European Observatory of Wildlife (EOW). EFSA Supporting Publ. 20, 7892E (2023).
van Klink, R. et al. Emerging technologies revolutionise insect ecology and monitoring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 872–885 (2022).
Kays, R. et al. The Movebank system for studying global animal movement and demography. Methods Ecol. Evol. 13, 419–431 (2022).
ENETWILD Consortium et al. Update on the development of the Agouti platform for collaborative science with camera traps and a tool for wildlife abundance estimation. EFSA Supporting Publ. 19, 7327E (2022).
Norros, V. et al. Roadmap for Implementing Environmental DNA (eDNA) and Other Molecular Monitoring Methods in Finland—Vision and Action Plan for 2022–2025 (Finnish Environment Institute, 2022).
Buchner, D., Macher, T.-H., Beermann, A. J., Werner, M.-T. & Leese, F. Standardized high-throughput biomonitoring using DNA metabarcoding: strategies for the adoption of automated liquid handlers. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 8, 100122 (2021).
European Committee for Standardization. CEN/TC 230—water analysis. CENELEC https://standards.cencenelec.eu/ords/f?p=CEN:110:::::FSP_PROJECT,FSP_ORG_ID:72999,6211&cs=1724A9E6CBB3F5C7D336BEE9B6C4B7769 (2023).
Nilsson, R. H. et al. Introducing guidelines for publishing DNA-derived occurrence data through biodiversity data platforms. Metabarcoding Metagenomics 6, e84960 (2022).
Abarenkov, K. et al. Publishing DNA-Derived Data Through Biodiversity Data Platforms (GBIF Secretariat, 2023).
Meissner, K., Aroviita, J., Baattrup-Pedersen, A. & Buchner, D. Metabarcoding for Use in Nordic Routine Aquatic Biomonitoring: A Validation Study (Nordic Council of Ministers Secretariat, 2020).
Blancher, P. et al. A strategy for successful integration of DNA-based methods in aquatic monitoring. Metabarcoding Metagenomics 6, e85652 (2022).
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
Schiller, C., Schmidtlein, S., Boonman, C., Moreno-Martínez, A. & Kattenborn, T. Deep learning and citizen science enable automated plant trait predictions from photographs. Sci. Rep. 11, 16395 (2021).
Albrecht, M. et al. The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1488–1498 (2021).
Kelling, S. et al. Using semistructured surveys to improve citizen science data for monitoring biodiversity. BioScience 69, 170–179 (2019).
Oliver, R. Y., Meyer, C., Ranipeta, A., Winner, K. & Jetz, W. Global and national trends, gaps, and opportunities in documenting and monitoring species distributions. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001336 (2021).
Pocock, M. J. O., Logie, M., Isaac, N. J. B., Fox, R. & August, T. The recording behaviour of field-based citizen scientists and its impact on biodiversity trend analysis. Ecol. Indic. 151, 110276 (2023).
Bowler, D. E. et al. Temporal trends in the spatial bias of species occurrence records. Ecography 2022, e06219 (2022).
Callaghan, C. T., Borda-de-Água, L., van Klink, R., Rozzi, R. & Pereira, H. M. Unveiling global species abundance distributions. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1600–1609 (2023).
Omeer, A. A. & Deshmukh, R. R. Deep learning-based models for classification of invasive plant species from hyperspectral remotely sensed data. In Proc. Int. Conf. Data Science, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (eds Jat, D. S. et al.) 222–230 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2022).
Perez, G. G. et al. Use of Sentinel 2 imagery to estimate vegetation height in fragments of Atlantic forest. Ecol. Inform. 69, 101680 (2022).
Shamoun-Baranes, J. et al. Continental-scale radar monitoring of the aerial movements of animals. Mov. Ecol. 2, 9 (2014).
Hardisty, A. R. et al. The Bari Manifesto: an interoperability framework for Essential Biodiversity Variables. Ecol. Inform. 49, 22–31 (2019).
Wisz, M. S. et al. The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling. Biol. Rev. 88, 15–30 (2013).
Kissling, W. D. et al. Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents. J. Biogeogr. 39, 2163–2178 (2012).
Pollock, L. J. et al. Understanding co-occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a joint species distribution model (JSDM). Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 397–406 (2014).
Maes, J. et al. Accounting for forest condition in Europe based on an international statistical standard. Nat. Commun. 14, 3723 (2023).
Navarro, L. M. et al. Integrating historical sources for long-term ecological knowledge and biodiversity conservation. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1, 657–670 (2025).
Basset, A., Tarantini, S. O., Eggermont, H., Mandon, C. & Vihervaara, P. Report on the Harmonisation and Interoperability of Datasets Across Regions and Countries (Biodiversa+, 2023).
Bubnicki, J. W. et al. Camtrap DP: an open standard for the FAIR exchange and archiving of camera trap data. Remote. Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 283–295 (2024).
Sica, Y. V. et al. Enabling ecological survey data integration with the Humboldt Extension to Darwin Core. Ecography 2025, e08223 (2025).
Breeze, T. et al. D3.4 Cost-effectiveness analysis of monitoring schemes. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints (2023).
Kissling, W. D. et al. Towards a modern and efficient European Biodiversity Observation Network fit for multiple policies. Preprint at EcoEvoRxiv https://doi.org/10.32942/X2K34F (2024).
Breeze, T. et al. D4.4 Business model for a European Biodiversity Observation Network based on the outcomes of the cost–benefit analysis of different monitoring scheme option. Preprint at ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e173693 (2025).
Gonzalez, A., Chase, J. M. & O’Connor, M. I. A framework for the detection and attribution of biodiversity change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 378, 20220182 (2023).
Affinito, F. et al. Assessing coverage of the monitoring framework of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and opportunities to fill gaps. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1280–1294 (2025).
Hébert, K. et al. Selecting indicators to track progress towards the Global Biodiversity Framework: a case study of Quebec’s 2030 Nature Plan. FACETS 10, 1–13 (2025).
Kim, H. et al. From data to decision: leveraging essential variables in standardizing biodiversity and ecosystem services monitoring and reporting. Preprint at EcoEvoRxiv https://doi.org/10.32942/X2130Z (2025).
EuropaBON. EBV descriptions. GitHub https://github.com/EuropaBON/EBV-Descriptions (2024).
Kissling, W. D. et al. Data underpinning the EuropaBON roadmap for a unified, transnational biodiversity observation system in Europe. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16940232 (2025).