Karki, L. et al. Potentials and barriers to land-based mitigation technologies and practices (LMTs)—a review. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace91f (2023).
Doelman, J. C. et al. Afforestation for climate change mitigation: potentials, risks and trade-offs. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 1576–1591 (2020).
Rogelj, J. et al. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 573, 357–363 (2019).
Rogelj, J. et al. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 325–332 (2018).
Creutzig, F. et al. Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. GCB Bioenergy 7, 916–944 (2015).
Bilbao, B., Mistry, J., Millán, A. & Berardi, A. Sharing multiple perspectives on burning: towards a participatory and intercultural fire management policy in Venezuela, Brazil, and Guyana. Fire 2, 39 (2019).
Harrison, M. E. et al. Tropical forest and peatland conservation in Indonesia: challenges and directions. People Nat. 2, 4–28 (2020).
Tanneberger, F. et al. The power of nature-based solutions: how peatlands can help us to achieve key EU sustainability objectives. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 5, 2000146 (2021).
Lal, R., Negassa, W. & Lorenz, K. Carbon sequestration in soil. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 15, 79–86 (2015).
Dooley, K. & Kartha, S. Land-based negative emissions: risks for climate mitigation and impacts on sustainable development. Int. Environ. Agreem. 18, 79–98 (2018).
Creutzig, F. et al. Considering sustainability thresholds for BECCS in IPCC and biodiversity assessments. GCB Bioenergy 13, 510–515 (2021).
Deprez, A. et al. Sustainability limits needed for CO2 removal. Science 383, 484–486 (2024).
Reich, P. B., Grace, K., Agrawal, A. & Nagendra, H. Mitigation justice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2411231122 (2025).
Hansson, A. et al. Preconditions for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of Tanzania. Environ. Dev. Sustain 22, 6851–6875 (2020).
Chiriacò, M. V. & Valentini, R. A Land-Based Approach for Climate Change Mitigation in the Livestock Sector (Copernicus GmbH, 2021).
Robertson, G. P., Hamilton, S. K., Paustian, K. & Smith, P. Land-based climate solutions for the United States. Glob. Chang. Biol. 28, 4912–4919 (2022).
Hansson, A., Anshelm, J., Fridahl, M. & Haikola, S. Boundary work and interpretations in the IPCC review process of the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) in limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Front. Clim. 3, 34 (2021).
Nunez, S., Verboom, J. & Alkemade, R. Assessing land-based mitigation implications for biodiversity. Environ. Sci. Policy 106, 68–76 (2020).
Fujimori, S. et al. Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security. Nat. Food 3, 110–121 (2022).
Krause, A. et al. Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land-based climate-change mitigation efforts. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 3025–3038 (2018).
Anguelovski, I. & Corbera, E. Integrating justice in Nature-Based Solutions to avoid nature-enabled dispossession. Ambio 52, 45–53 (2023).
Garrison, J. D. & Martinez, S. When mitigation is not “just mitigation”: defining (and diffusing) tensions between climate mitigation, adaptation, and justice. Landsc. Urban Plan. 248, 105081 (2024).
Hinz, R. et al. Agricultural development and land use change in India: a scenario analysis of trade-offs between UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Earth’s. Future 8, e2019EF001287 (2020).
Reckien, D. et al. Climate change, equity and the Sustainable Development Goals: an urban perspective. Environ. Urban. 29, 159–182 (2017).
Fricker, M. Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing (Clarendon Press, 2007).
Karner, K. et al. Developing stakeholder-driven scenarios on land sharing and land sparing – Insights from five European case studies. J. Environ. Manag. 241, 488–500 (2019).
Lieu, J. et al. Inclusive Stakeholder Engagement for Equitable Knowledge Co-Production: Insights from the EU’s Horizon 2020 Programme in Climate Change Research (oekom verlag, 2023).
Walby, S. Gender mainstreaming: productive tensions in theory and practice. Soc. Politics: Int. Stud. Gend. State Soc. 12, 321–343 (2005).
Dooley, K., Pelz, S. & Norton, A. Understanding land-based carbon dioxide removal in the context of the Rio Conventions. One Earth 7, 1501–1514 (2024).
Doelman, J. C. et al. Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation. Glob. Environ. Chang. 48, 119–135 (2018).
Gvein, M. H. et al. Potential of land-based climate change mitigation strategies on abandoned cropland. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 817 (2023).
Smith, P. et al. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 2285–2302 (2013).
Roe, S. et al. Land-based measures to mitigate climate change: potential and feasibility by country. Glob. change Biol. 27, 6025–6058 (2021).
de Coninck, H., A. et al. Strengthening and Implementing the Global Response. In Global Warming of 1.5°C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. P. et al.) 313−444 (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
Hurlbert, M., Krishnaswamy, J., Johnson, F. X., Rodríguez-Morales, J. E. & Zommers, Z. Risk Management and Decision Making in Relation to Sustainable Development (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019).
Humpenöder, F. et al. Overcoming global inequality is critical for land-based mitigation in line with the Paris Agreement. Nat. Commun. 13, 7453 (2022).
Malakar, Y. et al. Navigating stakeholder heterogeneity in carbon dioxide removal governance. Nat. Rev. Clean. Technol. 1, 95–105 (2025).
Wilson, C. et al. Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation. Clim. Chang. 166, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03099-9 (2021).
UNFCC. Nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement. Synthesis report by the secretariat. Available at https://unfccc.int/documents/619180 (2022).
Baptista, L. B. et al. Good practice policies to bridge the emissions gap in key countries. Glob. Environ. Chang. 73, 102472 (2022).
Dekker, M. M. et al. Navigating the black box of fair national emissions targets. Nat. Clim. Chang. 15, 752–759 (2025).
Stern, P. C. A reexamination on how behavioral interventions can promote household action to limit climate change. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–3 (2020).
Perkins, O. et al. Toward quantification of the feasible potential of land-based carbon dioxide removal. One Earth 6, 1638–1651 (2023).
Ferreira, V., Barreira, A., Loures, L., Antunes, D. & Panagopoulos, T. Stakeholders’ engagement on nature-based solutions: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 12, 640 (2020).
Hanger-Kopp, S., Lieu, J. & Nikas, A. Narratives of Low-Carbon Transitions (Routledge, London, 2019).
Crenshaw, K. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. In Feminist Legal Theories, 23−51 (Routledge, 2013).
Low, S., Baum, C. M. & Sovacool, B. K. Rethinking Net-Zero systems, spaces, and societies: “Hard” versus “soft” alternatives for nature-based and engineered carbon removal. Glob. Environ. Chang. 75, 102530 (2022).
Bamière, L., Jayet, P.-A., Kahindo, S. & Martin, E. Carbon sequestration in French agricultural soils: a spatial economic evaluation. Agric. Econ. 52, 301–316 (2021).
Lee, J. & Viscarra Rossel, R. A. Soil carbon simulation confounded by different pool initialisation. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 116, 245–255 (2020).
Jordon, M. W. et al. Can Regenerative Agriculture increase national soil carbon stocks? Simulated country-scale adoption of reduced tillage, cover cropping, and ley-arable integration using RothC. Sci. Total Environ. 825, 153955 (2022).
Wang, Y., Tao, F., Yin, L. & Chen, Y. Spatiotemporal changes in greenhouse gas emissions and soil organic carbon sequestration for major cropping systems across China and their drivers over the past two decades. Sci. total Environ. 833, 155087 (2022).
IPCC. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Available at https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/pdf/4_Volume4/19R_V4_Cover.pdf (2019).
Carlson, M. J., Mitchell, R. & Rodriguez, L. Scenario Analysis to Identify Viable Conservation Strategies in Paraguay’s Imperiled Atlantic Forest. E&S 16, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04267-160308 (2011).
Di Paola, A., Valentini, R. & Santini, M. An overview of available crop growth and yield models for studies and assessments in agriculture. J. Sci. Food Agric. 96, 709–714 (2016).
Abramoff, R. Z. et al. Improved global-scale predictions of soil carbon stocks with Millennial Version 2. Soil Biol. Biochem. 164, 108466 (2022).
Nendel, C. et al. Simulating regional winter wheat yields using input data of different spatial resolution. Field Crops Res. 145, 67–77 (2013).
Herzfeld, T., Heinke, J., Rolinski, S. & Müller, C. Soil organic carbon dynamics from agricultural management practices under climate change. Earth Syst. Dynam. 12, 1037–1055 (2021).
Lutz, F. et al. Simulating the effect of tillage practices with the global ecosystem model LPJmL (version 5.0-tillage). Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 2419–2440 (2019).
Porwollik, V. et al. The role of cover crops for cropland soil carbon, nitrogen leaching, and agricultural yields – a global simulation study with LPJmL (V. 5.0-tillage-cc). Biogeosciences 19, 957–977 (2022).
Lindeskog, M. et al. Implications of accounting for land use in simulations of ecosystem carbon cycling in Africa. Earth Syst. Dynam. 4, 385–407 (2013).
Krause, A. et al. Global consequences of afforestation and bioenergy cultivation on ecosystem service indicators. Biogeosciences 14, 4829–4850 (2017).
Abegaz, A., Ali, A., Tamene, L., Abera, W. & Smith, J. U. Modeling long-term attainable soil organic carbon sequestration across the highlands of Ethiopia. Environ. Dev. Sustain 24, 5131–5162 (2022).
Morais, T. G., Teixeira, R. F. M. & Domingos, T. Detailed global modelling of soil organic carbon in cropland, grassland and forest soils. PLoS ONE 14, e0222604 (2019).
Haas, E., Carozzi, M., Massad, R. S., Butterbach-Bahl, K. & Scheer, C. Long term impact of residue management on soil organic carbon stocks and nitrous oxide emissions from European croplands. Sci. Total Environ. 836, 154932 (2022).
Lee, J., Necpálová, M. & Six, J. Biophysical potential of organic cropping practices as a sustainable alternative in Switzerland. Agric. Syst. 181, 102822 (2020).
Zhang, F., Wang, S., Zhao, M., Qin, F. & Liu, X. Regional simulation of soil organic carbon dynamics for dry farmland in Northeast China using the CENTURY model. PloS one 16, e0245040 (2021).
Chen, J. et al. To burn or retain crop residues on croplands? An integrated analysis of crop residue management in China. Sci. total Environ. 662, 141–150 (2019).
Song, J. et al. The carbon sequestration potential of China’s grasslands. Ecosphere 9, e02452 (2018).
Feuerbacher, A., Herrmann, T., Neuenfeldt, S., Laub, M. & Gocht, A. Estimating the economics and adoption potential of agrivoltaics in Germany using a farm-level bottom-up approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 168, 112784 (2022).
Pezzuolo, A. et al. Evaluating the impact of soil conservation measures on soil organic carbon at the farm scale. Comput. Electron. Agric. 135, 175–182 (2017).
Luedeling, E. & Neufeldt, H. Carbon sequestration potential of parkland agroforestry in the Sahel. Clim. Chang. 115, 443–461 (2012).
Dislich, C. et al. Land-use change in oil palm dominated tropical landscapes—an agent-based model to explore ecological and socio-economic trade-offs. PLoS ONE 13, e0190506 (2018).
Grace, P. & Robertson, G. P. Soil carbon sequestration potential and the identification of hotspots in the eastern Corn Belt of the United States. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 85, 1410–1424 (2021).
Fradette, O. et al. Additional carbon sequestration potential of abandoned agricultural land afforestation in the boreal zone: a modelling approach. For. Ecol. Manag. 499, 119565 (2021).
Le Noë, J. et al. Modeling and empirical validation of long-term carbon sequestration in forests (France, 1850-2015). Glob. change Biol. 26, 2421–2434 (2020).
Allen, S. C. et al. Safety-net role of tree roots: evidence from a pecan (Carya illinoensis K. Koch)–cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States. For. Ecol. Manag. 192, 395–407 (2004).
Biala, J. et al. The potential for enhancing soil carbon levels through the use of organic soil amendments in Queensland, Australia. Reg. Environ. Change 21, 174 (2021).
Ma, J. et al. Assessing the impacts of agricultural managements on soil carbon stocks, nitrogen loss, and crop production—a modelling study in eastern Africa. Biogeosciences 19, 2145–2169 (2022).
Olin, S. et al. Soil carbon management in large-scale Earth system modelling: implications for crop yields and nitrogen leaching. Earth Syst. Dynam. 6, 745–768 (2015).
Schaldach, R. et al. A model-based assessment of the environmental impact of land-use change across scales in Southern Amazonia. Reg. Environ. Change 18, 161–173 (2018).
Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 5425–5464 (2020).
O’Neill, B. C. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3461–3482 (2016).
Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).
IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Shukla P. R. et al.). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926 (Cambridge University Press, 2022).
Cultice, B., Irwin, E. & Jones, M. Accounting for spatial economic interactions at local and meso scales in integrated assessment model (IAM) frameworks: challenges and recent progress. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 35009 (2023).
Low, S., Brutschin, E., Baum, C. M. & Sovacool, B. K. Expert perspectives on incorporating justice considerations into integrated assessment modelling. npj Clim. Action 4, 1–12 (2025).
Kragt, M. E., Gibson, F. L., Maseyk, F. & Wilson, K. A. Public willingness to pay for carbon farming and its co-benefits. Ecol. Econ. 126, 125–131 (2016).
Sharma, M., Kaushal, R., Kaushik, P. & Ramakrishna, S. Carbon farming: prospects and challenges. Sustainability 13, 11122 (2021).
Köberle, A. C., Rochedo, P. R. R., Lucena, A. F. P., Szklo, A. & Schaeffer, R. Brazil’s emission trajectories in a well-below 2 °C world: the role of disruptive technologies versus land-based mitigation in an already low-emission energy system. Clim. Chang. 162, 1823–1842 (2020).
Manivasagam, V. S. & Rozenstein, O. Practices for upscaling crop simulation models from field scale to large regions. Comput. Electron. Agric. 175, 105554 (2020).
Yang, Y. et al. Regionalizing crop types to enhance global ecosystem modeling of maize production. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 14013 (2022).
Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Chang. 42, 331–345 (2017).
Roe, S. et al. Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 817–828 (2019).
Meinshausen, M. et al. The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3571–3605 (2020).
Berger, T. & Troost, C. Agent-based modelling of climate adaptation and mitigation options in agriculture. J. Agric Econ. 65, 323–348 (2014).
Feliciano, D., Hunter, C., Slee, B. & Smith, P. Climate change mitigation options in the rural land use sector: Stakeholders’ perspectives on barriers, enablers and the role of policy in North East Scotland. Environ. Sci. Policy 44, 26–38 (2014).
Bohunovsky, L., Jäger, J. & Omann, I. Participatory scenario development for integrated sustainability assessment. Reg. Environ. Chang. 11, 271–284 (2011).
Grassi, G. et al. Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 425–434 (2021).
Harper, A. B. et al. Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets. Nat. Commun. 9, 2938 (2018).
Turner, P. A., Field, C. B., Lobell, D. B., Sanchez, D. L. & Mach, K. J. Unprecedented rates of land-use transformation in modelled climate change mitigation pathways. Nat. Sustain. 1, 240–245 (2018).
Griewald, Y. et al. Developing land use scenarios for stakeholder participation in Russia. Land Use Policy 68, 264–276 (2017).
Koo, H., Kleemann, J. & Fürst, C. Land use scenario modeling based on local knowledge for the provision of ecosystem services in Northern Ghana. Land 7, 59 (2018).
Mora, O. et al. Exploring the future of land use and food security: a new set of global scenarios. PloS one 15, e0235597 (2020).
Aubert, A. H., Bauer, R. & Lienert, J. A review of water-related serious games to specify use in environmental Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Environ. Model. Softw. 105, 64–78 (2018).
Fasth, T., Bohman, S., Larsson, A., Ekenberg, L. & Danielson, M. Portfolio decision analysis for evaluating stakeholder conflicts in land use planning. Group Decis. Negot. 29, 321–343 (2020).
Cronin, J. et al. Embedding justice in the 1.5 C transition: a transdisciplinary research agenda. Renew. Sustain. Energy Transit. 1, 100001 (2021).
Ai, Z., Hanasaki, N., Heck, V., Hasegawa, T. & Fujimori, S. Global bioenergy with carbon capture and storage potential is largely constrained by sustainable irrigation. Nat. Sustain 4, 884–891 (2021).
Abram, S. et al. Just transition: a whole-systems approach to decarbonisation. Clim. Policy 22, 1033–1049 (2022).
Lieu, J., Mangalagiu, D., Martínez-Reyes, A. & Sarrica, M. Just social-ecological tipping scales: a mid-range social theory of change in coal and carbon intensive regions. Glob. Environ. Change 92, 103000 (2025).
UN Economic and Social Council. Special Edition of the Sustainable Development Goals Progress Report: Report of the Secretary-General. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3810131?v=pdf#files (2019).
McCauley, D. A., Heffron, R. J., Stephan, H. & Jenkins, K. Advancing energy justice: the triumvirate of tenets. Int. Energy Law Rev. 32, 107–110 (2013).
Virla, L. D. et al. Risk blindness in local perspectives about the Alberta oil sands hinders Canada’s decarbonization. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 40, 569–585 (2021).
UN Environment, ed. Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People. Cambridge University Press (2019).